Issues 1. Appraise the recent performance and financial position of Dawson Stores, Inc., using selected financial ratios as appropriate (Horizontal and Vertical analysis) 2. As Stefanie Anderson, would you conclude that the company is a good credit risk? If not, provide recommendations to the client on how to solve their issues. Facts Dawson Stores, Inc. was incorporated in 1881 by John Dawson Sr. After his death, tge stock had been widely spread since he divided his share among his five children and 14 grandchildren. John Dawson Jr. is now the president of Dawson Stores, Inc. His brother, Bill, is the Vice-president and Treasurer, and their two sisters and two cousins were the directors and officers. Dawson Stores, Inc. is a …show more content…
However, it has a good and increasing Earning per Share of Common Stock. Furthermore, the company has a record of increasing revenue, thus reflecting an increase in net income. Long-Term Liquidity Ratios 2007 2008 2009 2010 Debt Ratio 0.59 0.58 0.58 0.57 Time- Interest-Earned “A company with a high portion of long-term debt is said to be highly leveraged” (Anthony el al., 2011, p. 232). The debt ratio indicates the percentage of assets financed with debt. The higher the debt ratio, the higher the financial risk. A debt ratio of less than one, indicates that a company has more assets than debt in form of liabilities. Dawson Stores, Inc. has debt ratio less than one. Short-Term, Liquidity Ratios 2007 2008 2009 2010 Current Ratio 2.12 2.02 1.74 1.67 Quick Ratio 1.12 1.13 1.02 1.00 Liquidity demonstrate the company’s ability to pay its obligations and current liabilities with current assets. Quick ratio demonstrate the ability to pay all current liabilities if they come due immediately. its is desirable for current assets to exceed current liabilities, “ a current ratio of at least 2 to 1 is believed to be desirable” (Anthony el al., 2011, p. 42). A quick ratio of 1.5 indicates that the company has $1.5 of liquid assets for every $1 of current liabilities. Dawson Stores, Inc. has maintain a current ratio higher than 2 for previous years. Even though the this ratio dropped over the most recent years, as well as the quick ratio, the company can
13. How would you assess the strengths and weaknesses of the Lawrence's financial condition at this stage in their
The liquidity of firm can be measured by computing certain ratio’s such as current ratio and acid ratio. For measuring Target Corporation’s 2014 liquidity; the firm’s current ratio and the acid ratio is computed. The company’s current ratio is 0.91 times which is computed by comparing current asset ($11, 573,000) with current liabilities ($12,777, 000) of the year 2014 (TGT Company Financial, n.d). The firm’s acid ratio is 0.26 times which is computed by deducting inventory ($8,278,000) from current assets. The inventory is deducted from current assets because the company has not received any money for the unfinished good or from unsold inventory worth ($8,278,000). To analyze the Target Corporation’s liquidity trend in 2014; the current ratio and acid ratio of 2014 is compared with the 2015’s ratios. In 2015, the firm’s current ratio was 1.20 times and the acid ratio was 0.45 times. These liquidity ratios reflect that the firm’s liquidity was better in 2015 than 2014. (See Table 1).
Quick ratio is another measure of liquidity. In quick ratio we consider only liquid assets and its standard ratio is 1:1. Quick ratio of Peyton Approved is 7.63. Thus, there is no doubt that the company has got excellent liquidity. Company has enough liquid assets to pay off current liabilities.
Liquidity is important for any firm as it is an assessment of the ability to pay its' liabilities in the short term. There are two main liquidity ratios: the current and the quick ratio. The current ratios divides the current assets by the current liabilities to assess how many times the current assets can pay the current liabilities (Elliott and Elliott, 2011). Traditional ratios are usually in the region of 1.5, but this may vary depending on the industry and nature of the business (Elliott and Elliott, 2011). The current ratio is shown in table 1.
Liquidity ratios are the temporary capabilities of a business to compensate for its established requirements and unanticipated needs for cash. Suppliers and bankers are the short-term creditors who are mostly
This ratio is similar to current ratio, except that it excludes inventory from current assets. Inventory is subtracted because it is considered to be less liquid than other current assets, that is, it cannot be easily used to pay for the company’s current liabilities. A company having a quick ratio of at least 1.0, is considered to be financially stable. It has sufficient liquid assets and hence, it will be able to pay back its debts easily (Qasim Saleem et al., 2011).
These ratios are computed to judge the short term liquidity of the business. Two most important liquidity ratios are current ratio and quick ratio. These ratios determine the ability of firm to meets its current liabilities out of its current/quick assets.
The Quick Ratio also known as Acid Ratio is used by firms to determine liquidity position. It explains if the firm is able to pay all of their current debt liabilities. (Dyson, 2010) The graph above illustrates that over the period from 2007 to 2011 quick ratio was not more that 1, which means that their debts might not be covered all. The graph also indicates that a peak was in 2011.
Liquidity ratio. The firm’s liquidity shows a downward trend through time. The current ratio is decreasing because the growth in current liabilities outpaces the growth of current assets. The quick ratio is also declining but not as fast as the current ratio. From 1991 to 1992, it only decreased 0.35 units while the current ratio decreased 0.93 units. Looking at the common size balance sheet, we also see that the percentage of inventory is growing from 33% to 48% indicating Mark X could not convert its inventory to cash.
Liquidity ratios measure the ability of a firm to meet its short-term obligations. A company that is not able
From your analysis of research materials, examine the company and provide a report on the short and long range financial problems that are evident from the review. If you find no short or long range financial problems, provide the evidence to justify this conclusion.
Liquidity In analyzing liquidity of the company, the current ratio is not very telling of a falling company. The company increased its ratio throughout the period of the income statement thus building upon its company assets and allowing for a 6-1 ratio of assets over its liabilities. This implies the company is still able to operate sufficiently even though it did not make its optimum current ratio of about 8-1. However, when one takes the inventory out of the equation with the quick ratio, the numbers show the true strength of short term liquidity. The numbers are still good, and do not indicate failure – but are
These ratios help company in determining its capability to pay short-term debts. Liquidity ratios inform about, how quickly a firm can obtain cash by liquidating its current assets in order to pay its liabilities. General liquidity ratios are: current ratio and quick ratio. Current ration can be obtain by dividing company’s current assets by its’ current liabilities. Generally a current ratio of two is considered as good (Cleverley et al., 2011). Quick ratio also known as acid test determines company’s liabilities that need to be fulfilled on urgent basis. Quick ratio can be obtained by dividing quick assets by current liabilities. Quick ratio is considered as stricter because it excludes inventories from current assets. Generally a quick ratio of 1:1 is considered as good for the company. Higher quick
The quick ratio reflects on a company’s ability to meet its current liabilities without liquidating inventories that could require markdowns. It is a more stringent test of liquidity than the current ratio and may provide more insight into company liquidity in some cases. For Colgate-Palmolive, the quick ratio has declined from 0.73 in 2008 to 0.58 in 2010. While this does not necessarily mean a problem, a higher current ratio and quick ratio analysis will mean that the company will not have difficulty in meeting its short-term obligations from its operations and not by liquidating its assets.
The quick ratio of 1.46 is a further analysis into the actual monetary values that are highly liquid and excluding fixed assets as part of the assets. The CFO/Avg. current liabilities also show a healthy 73%, 28% in 2004, on average of which is still higher than the industry.