preview

Stage 4 Critique

Good Essays

Critique of stage 4 scope and sequence

Within the stage 4 scope and sequence and unit of work plan selected for this critique, there are various areas of merit and capacity for improvement. The main areas of concern that will be assessed include the choice of appropriate topics, timing, and the selection of syllabus outcomes, content, teaching strategies and activities that aim to foster development of historical skills and concepts. The unit of work is successful in its capacity to cater to various learning and communication styles of students and its range of assessment strategies. Although the unit of work displays potential for differentiated programming, it is not explicitly indicated on either the scope and sequence and unit of work. …show more content…

Within the scope and sequence, there is much variation between the timing of units. For example, Depth Study 1 has been allocated four and a half weeks of teaching time whereas Depth Study 2 has been given eight and a half weeks to complete. This however, is not particularly concerning as certain units may take longer to complete than others. Also missing from the scop and sequence plan is any reference to time set aside for examine revision. As time allocation for units are not department mandated, schools and teachers are able to decide on the timing of units during the planning process. (NSW Department of Education and Communities, 2012, p.7) In order to achieve a more even distribution of teaching time among depth studies, it could be beneficial to integrate overviews into the depth studies rather than at the beginning. Again, teachers are able to decide when they would like to teach …show more content…

As there are multiple ways in which students can display abilities, variety in assessment forms enable teachers gain a rounded understanding and assortment of evidence about the development of students’ historical skills. The unit of work is clearly designed to accommodate various learner intelligences through its learning and assessment forms. While there is evidence of a formative judging process, there is no indication of the use of summative judgement at the end of the unit of work.

As Stephanie Ingster outlines (lecture 2, slide 37), explains that teachers need to focus on assessment for learning as students are able to receive feedback and reflect during the unit rather that at the end of teaching. In this way, teachers and students are able to gain a better sense of direction for motivation and improvement in ongoing teaching and

Get Access