preview

Starbucks vs. Ethiopia (Csr Issue)

Decent Essays

Issue Two: Starbucks vs. Ethiopia
In March 2005, Ethiopia filed applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to trademark its coffee names, Harar, Sidamo, and Yirgacheffe, which are three coffee regions in the country. The Ethiopian government had hoped that by forcing coffee buyers into licensing agreements would lead to coffee farmers gaining more control over its coffee trade and earn a bigger slice of the pie by receiving a higher percentage of earnings from the retail price of coffee. It is estimated that Ethiopian farmers could earn up to USD 88 million extra per year.
Oxfam America had accused Starbucks of prompting the National Coffee Association of USA (NCA) to oppose the trademark application which …show more content…

Utilitarianism is an ethical doctrine which states that people should produce the most happiness or pleasure for everyone who is affected by those actions. The utilitarian view of justice proposes an economic system which will benefit the society than any other system. Besides, the proponents of this view also hold the opinion that steps should be taken to reduce great income disparities that further polarize our society. Hence it is suggested that an egalitarian allocation of income would increase the income of people who earn less which would eventually boost total happiness (Shaw, 2005) The underlying fact that coffee farmers only get 10% of the profit of each cup of coffee sold and millions of Ethiopians who rely on coffee trade as a source of income and living under extreme poverty suggests that Starbucks did not practice what they preach and should have taken a more holistic approach in helping coffee farmers in Ethiopia earning a fairer share of income from the coffee trade.
Proponents of the broader view of corporate social responsibility stress that organizations are integrated with the rest of the society and have a moral obligation to their stakeholders which include employees, suppliers, customers, the community, and the society at large (Shaw, 2005). Besides, proponents of human rights

Get Access