Entry one: as or like I chose this entry because, I strongly felt I would benefit from learning more about when to use the two terms. Much like other people, I use both of these words a lot when I’m speaking or writing a paper. I believe both terms are very common in a lot of writings, because they are fundamental when making a comparison. In my opinion, it is very tricky to know when it is appropriate to use either one though. A lot of times, they both allow a sentence to make sense. These two simple words have so much meaning. For example, we learned in elementary school that these two words can represent simile sentences, which I think give even more of an importance to them.
When reading about this section in, “May I Quote You On That?” by Stephen Spector, I instantly got excited. Initially, my first method in seeing the difference was to replace ‘like’ and fill in the blank with ‘similar to/for example’. I took the first practice quiz and earned a 3 out of 5. This method I came up with did not work well with the sentences given to me. Some of the sentences were common phrases I have heard before, and those were the only three I got right. Therefore, I have decided
…show more content…
Even Spector lists the different occasions on when each term can occur, and it is exhausting trying to keep all of those factors in mind at once. The book states how each of the terms can also occur before a verb, or how ‘like’ is often used before pronouns, or other nouns (34-37). Finally, on the last practice quiz, I earned a 5 out of 5. The best thing that helped me that I did not do before, was look after the blank and decided if I could spot the subject and verb under the predicate of the sentence. If I could, then I used the term ‘as’. I felt relieved that I improved on this section and that I could identify when to use the different terms, even if they both make sense in a
regards to the events that happened in this period, and the ability of both writers to convey
analogies to make between these two works are, I think, those between the works' two
During the summer of 1979, Doug Sulliman was part of a bumper crop of future NHLers chosen in the opening round of the league’s annual entry draft. Included were the likes of Mike Gartner, Rick Vaive, Ray Bourque, Paul Reinhart and Michel Goulet.
For this segment, you will compare and contrast two different pieces of writing in preparation for eventually writing a compare-contrast essay. You will
Compare the views of these two scholars by answering the following questions. Be sure to find specific examples in the selections to support your answers.
Directions: Identify the type of sentence – simple (I), compound (I, fanboy I or I;I), or complex (D,I ID or I wedge D).
Whilst the two texts are presented in a different way, both formats receive a similar response from the reader and are useful in presenting particular ideas about
They are not a similar thing. As irritating as it is that individuals keep toiling up this obsolete relationship amongst introspection and misery, I can see where the perplexity lies.
For instance, a significant factor contributing to the evident contrast between the two works is each passage’s tone. The author of the first passage uses a factual and informative tone, unlike the author of the second passage. Relying mainly on logic and facts, the author of the first excerpt produces
First, the plots of both works need to be discussed and explained how they are different. The stories of both works have basically the same
How can to text be similar? In the excerpt from “father” by Alice Walker ,she explains her relationship with her father, and in The kite Runner by khaled Amir explains his experience with his father. Amir and Alice had similar experiences. The narrators in both literary selections relate the events about their journey in the form of conflict. In the excerpt from “father” by Alice walker she describes how she was disconnected with her father, like Amir who wished to be closer to his father, she to wished to be closer to her father.
I will compare and contrast
Writer, Michael specter who has been awarded the Global Health Council's annual Excellence award twice spend his time writing about developing issues such as agricultural biotechnology, before he served as the national science reporter. Specter claims that there is no need for GMO labels and it does not make “scientific sense”(Specter. Par. 6) to include them on food products. Specter main concern is just because food companies are adding GMO labels to the product does not give the consumer enough information about what the actual ingredients are. “They would tell you how your food is put together, but not what it contains. How could that help anyone make a sound decision about his health”(Specter. Par. 6)? The public is getting more curious
However these two perspectives have some traits which make one unique from another and these are discussions as below,
For example, honor manifests itself similarly in each work, but is acted on to a different extent. In both