preview

Stone Butch Blues Gender

Decent Essays

Leslie Feinberg’s Stone Butch Blues discusses the reality that a person’s identity is not based solely on singular moments in one’s life but on all of those moments added together. Sexuality and gender are in a constant state of flux, able to change from moment to moment, and the person experiences them in moments. Mimi Marinucci uses Gender Defined and Undefined to discuss this very experience, and I question if sexuality and gender can really exist, if by the moment they are constantly changing and fluid. I think that Stone Butch Blues demonstrates that the very nature of gender and sexuality is changing, and that moments - or states of being - do not have essential definitions but are no less valid for that characteristic; further, over …show more content…

At the beginning of the novel, Jess talks about what it was like to be young and already posing questions about identity and then through the novel explores that identity. Jess feels as though, from the moment she was born, that she was different from other typical girls, forcing her to question herself. Over time, she joined in with the butch scene, taking on a masculine female persona, and then eventually taking hormones to become physically male; however, she stopped hormones when she realized they were not for her and did not accurately fit into her identifying characteristics. One could argue that Jess is confused throughout this novel, struggling to find that piece of herself that fits just right and is constantly switching out pieces to do so. However, I think that what Leslie Feinberg is portraying is not a lost and confused individual, but an individual who changes. Jess’s identities throughout the book - from Butch to man to woman to Jess - are not each of themselves incorrect. They are real and valid at the time that they exist. Jess’s change over time, from where she starts to where she ends up, is what defines her as a person, not the labels that tried to give her an unchanging definition over time (Feinberg 322, …show more content…

Our standards of acceptable deviant behavior over time has changed, seemingly in some abstractly exponential way, but the pattern over time has not really been consistent (Shilts 1-30, Pew). To be clear, society relates to the human context in general, not just a specific region or country. Without subdividing into groups, like Marinucci described, views on sexuality and gender are not wholly consistent (Marinucci 68). In the United States queer people are finding more openness, relative to recent history, but in many European countries queer people are more widely accepted and have been so for longer (Pew). Indonesia has five different, recognized genders, but a lot of the world has a very strict binary (O’Connor). This is not meant to talk about the dichotomy between East and West, or everywhere else and the United States, but more so to make the point that, as far as human sexuality and gender are concerned in the general human context, gender and sexuality do not seem to have clear patterns of change and evolution so as to form an actual definition for them. Questions like, What does it mean to be a woman? or What does it mean to be queer? have different answers depending on where the question is asked. Even the lexical terms used to talk about those identities changes depending on geography (O’Connor). Those identities

Get Access