preview

Street Daylight Kevin Peterson Analysis

Decent Essays

Kevin Peterson is a Houston based figurative painter. He has done many works of graffiti art such as Into the Light, Rooster Brand, Cold, Angel, and Street Light. The urban environment plays a huge roll in his provoking visual subject matter. He prefers to set children against a backdrop of harsh streets and graffiti covered surroundings. The painter claims his inspiration leaps from this juxtaposition, the purity and innocence that the youth present contrasted with the weathered and decayed areas of the metropolis. In Peterson’s moving works, there is a contrast that suffices as both a metaphor and a recurring composition. “At one point the walls and backdrops in my paintings were shiny and new, untouched, just like we were as kids,” he says. …show more content…

For a few years, he had a career in social work. Nevertheless, the call of art enticed him back to his childhood passion. Instead of attempting to help resolve social issues, he chooses to depict them in paint.
In Streetlight, a young lady holding a baby stands unaccompanied against a dingy wall covered in graffiti after dark. An interesting tension is created by looking at the realistic rendering of figures on a perfectly smooth painted surface, blended with their dull apparel, and an image of youthful pureness of innocence, comparing it to the colorful, vivid, crude and profane graffiti covered walls. The tension yields an interplay of symbolism amongst the principals of drab and colorful, innocent and corrupt, and smooth and rough that tells a quality story.
The young woman’s hair is in a bun, leaving her face visible. Her apparel is a modest, long grey skirt and a black long-sleeved shirt. She is standing and holding the baby. She looks off to the left beyond the picture plane. With a smile on its face, the baby stares out straight at the viewer with arms extended to its sides. “Light filters down from the upper right hand side of the painting from what can be assumed to be the implied streetlight from which the painting gets its name” (Manley). This vivid lighting technique focuses on the two people while also shedding light on the graffiti covered …show more content…

The figures are Caucasians dressed in shades of grey and are almost lacking in color. The wall is covered in vibrant, angular graffiti known as wildstyle. With bright tones of orange, red, blue, and yellow throughout, the stylized scrawl is unreadable. It motions the eye throughout the background of the art piece. “Wildstyle is known for its intricate letterforms as well as directional arrows, stars and other shapes” (Manley). The graffiti is hard to read. Peterson purposely chopped off the beginning and end of the name or word on the piece so it cannot be read at all. This cropping technique strengthens the variation between rendered figures and their setting therefore contrasting illegible to legible, part to whole. This increases the tension in the

Get Access