Structure And Significance Of Argument

Better Essays

Structure and Significance Of Argument
Name of Student:
An argument is the exchange of opposite views about a given action in order to convince people that an action is either right or wrong. In most cases someone else has given their conclusions on the argument and one tries to prove that the conclusions are either right or wrong in relation to how they feel about the action. An argument is made up of premises and conclusions. In an argument, the philosopher tries to support their conclusion on something through the use of premises. Although most arguments end up leading to chaos it is a good way of reaching a conclusion where many people are in agreement.
Thesis …show more content…

In the passage Hume, Section IV, pp. 20-25, the philosopher, Hume sums that inferences based on one’s experience are not founded on argument or a procedure of the comprehension. He thinks that we are dedicated to the common knowledge that the future will be similar to the history only that we are not sensibly vindicated in retaining this belief because reasoning as a tool is weaker than we could have imagined. He goes further to support his argument by using a number of premises.
Firstly, he argues that he might know many facts through sensory experience but the fact that her ally is in Germany or that the sun will show up tomorrow is an unobserved experience and is known through a process of cause and effect like his friend being in France might have been a fact he knew through receiving a letter and about the sun rising tomorrow might be because the sun has risen in the past times. He sums up that our understanding of causes and effects should be founded on experience since we conclude future phenomena from what happened in the past.
Secondly, he uses demonstrative reasoning supporting relationship of clues and the moral reasoning supporting issues of truth. He explains that we cannot be aware that the future will look like the past based on the demonstrative reasoning because there is no ambiguity in proposing that the future will not be similar to the past similar

Get Access