Study Of The Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo

The experimental study that I chose to write about is the Stanford Prison Experiment, which was run by Phillip Zimbardo. More than seventy applicants answered an ad looking for volunteers to participate in a study that tested the physiological effects of prison life. The volunteers were all given interviews and personality tests. The study was left with twenty-four male college students. For the experiment, eighteen volunteers took part, with the other volunteers being on call. The volunteers were then divided into two groups, guards and prisoners, randomly assigned by coin flips. The experiment began on August 14th, 1971 in the basement of Stanford’s psychology building. To create the prison cells for the prisoners, the doors were taken

Into two groups. One were prisoners and the other were guards. Each group had their own

Before watching this video and discussing it in class I never heard of the Stanford University Prison Experiment. I don’t think this experiment was very ethic due to the gruesome treatment that went on over thirty years ago in the basement of this university. In 1971 Dr. Philp Zimbardo a former sociologist at Stanford created a mock prison to do an unethical experiment. He wanted to test the power of a cruel environment without clear rules to change and transform “normal” people in a prison life experiment. In 2003 in Abu Ghraib, Iraq military enforcement tortured and beat people that did not want to follow the strict directions given to them. No one of ever knew about the treatment against these people if it was not pictures of proof to help

The Zimbardo prison experiment was a study of human responses to captivity, dehumanization and its effects on the behavior on authority figures and inmates in prison situations. Conducted in 1971 the experiment was led by Phlilip Zimbardo. Volunteer College students played the roles of both guards and prisoners living in a simulated prison setting in the basement of the Stanford psychology building.

You’re sitting at your house, you hear a knock at the door. You go and open it and to your surprise it’s the police. They’re turning you around and placing cold metal handcuffs on you while you’re getting read your miranda rights and spread eagle against the cop car while you’re searched. You’re being slung into the back of a cop car and driven to the police station, sirens wailing. When you arrive you get your picture taken, but you don’t smile. They take your finger and dip it in ink, then push it down hard on a piece of paper. They then put you back into the police car and drive you to another location. You’re still handcuffed, and you’re taken in. They put you in a dress, they put cold, heavy, loud shackles on your ankles.

The Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment has to be one of the cruelest and disturbing experiments I have witnessed since the Milgram experiment. This experiment was pushed far beyond its means and went extremely too far. I know experiments in 1971 weren’t as thorough and strategic as today's but I know today's rules and regulations never allow cruel and unusual punish just to test out one’s theory’s. I don’t believe criminologists should be permitted to conduct replications of Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment. I also know that the ACJS and other organizations who set the rules and guidelines for experiments would not promote or condone an experiment that is dangerous and is unethical such as Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment. There were no boundaries or a level

In 1971, psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues created the experiment known as the Stanford Prison Experiment. Zimbardo wanted to investigate further into human behavior, so he created this experiment that looked at the impact of taking the role of a prisoner or prison guard. These researchers examined how the participants would react when placed in an institutionalized prison environment. They set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University’s psychology building. Twenty four undergraduate students were selected to play the roles of both prisoners and guards. These students were chosen because they were emotional, physically, and mentally stable. Though the experiment was expected to last two weeks, it only lasted six days after the researchers and participants became aware of the harm that was being done.

I was actually interested in watching this movie before I took this class. This may sound weird I have a serious interest in what went on inside prisons and what can make or break someone. The Stanford Prison Experiment was it was held at Stanford University during August fourteenth through August twenty first, 1971. The research group was led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo using college students. Though background information of the experiment and my response to the experiment.

In 1971, this experiment was initiated by Prof Philip Zimbardo, who is the psychology professor of the Stanford University. He designed this experiment was for the purpose of the study of human behavior when good people were put into an evil environment. He wanted to study what motivate the human behavior if the environment people stay controls their behaviors or their behavior are leaded by people’s insight capacity which are their moralities and values.

Society has an influence in most of our daily activities, especially when these activities involve other people. During the Zimbardo Prison Experiment two groups of students were asked to play one of two roles, a prisoner and a guard. The good people that played the guards were completely caught up in their role as prison guard and created a new identity to match their situation. Their normal behavior would not have worked in an environment where they must be strict to keep "criminals" in check, therefore they had to change their behavior into a more ruthless and aggressive manner to fit their new role. During the reign of Nazi Germany most of the soldiers were not apparently capable of doing the acts that were committed, but because of the

A standout amongst the most broadly refered to tests in the field of brain research is the Stanford Prison Experiment, in which brain science teacher Philip Zimbardo set out to concentrate the presumption of parts in a thought up circumstance. The point of the test was to examine how promptly individuals would adjust to the parts of watch and detainee in a pretending activity that recreated jail life. Zimbardo (1973) was keen on seeing if the fierceness reported among watchmen in American detainment facilities was because of the perverted identities of the gatekeepers or had more to do with the jail environment. The autonomous variable is the irregular task of parts as either jail protect or detainee, additionally named 'single treatment variable'

Dr. Philip Zimbardo wanted to test his hypothesis that the different personality traits of prisoners and the prison environment are the main causes of abuse in prison. He believed that if prisoners and guards behaved in a non-aggressive manner it was because of their personality and if they behave the same way as people do in real prisons, it was because of their situation. To test his hypothesis, Zimbardo converted the basement of the Stanford University psychology building into a mock prison. He wanted students to take the roles of prisoners and guards, 75 Students volunteered, but only 24 male students were screened for psychological normality, they were paid $15 per day to be a part of the experiment.

Stanford Prison Experiment The research conducted in the Stanford Prison Experiment was part of a big project that was sponsored by the office of Naval Research to establish and design a better understanding of what cause humans beings to become so aggressive and also the psychological underlying of what triggers an aggressive behaviour. Dr Zimbardo was in charge of this experiment and had to stimulate a prison kind environment where he randomly assigned half of the students to act as prisoners and the half as prison guards in a controlled environment. He gave the guards all attended powers and the prisoners were under obligation to totally be under subjugation or allow the guards to have total dominion over them. These were normal intelligent

Conducted by Philip Zambardo, the Stanford prison experiment was a psychological study about the effects of captivity and the human reaction to these effects. His motivation was to discover how humans behaved in a negative environment. Yet his study was short on ethics. The Stanford prison experiment was a landmark psychology study of human behavior in captivity yet it raised troubling questions about the ethical treatment of its subjects.

In summer of 1971, the police publicly arrested 10 students who did nothing wrong besides that they agree to participate for $15 a day in one of the social psychology's most notorious studies since Milgram's house of pain back in the 60s. These students were taken to the Stanford County Prison (a mock prison which is located at the university, where they were set to be held prisoner for next two weeks. In addition, participating in this experiment was 11 students who were to play the role of prison guards. According to the head researcher and acting prison warden, Philip Zimbardo, "The purpose of that experiment was to understand the development of norms and the effects of roles, labels, and social expectations in a simulated prison environment."