preview

Subprime Meltdown

Decent Essays

Subprime Meltdown: American Housing and Global Financial Turmoil Borrowers with a lower credit score were considered as risky and were called ‘subprime borrowers’. Therefore the interest rates on these loans were higher than the rates given to borrowers with a higher credit rating. In the 1970s it was very difficult for these borrowers to avail loans. They had to apply through conventional lenders for loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). The procedure was long and tedious and required a lot of documentation. Early Days: Lenders traditionally offered the fixed 30-year mortgage with no prepayment penalties which were offered by the banks and Savings and Loan Associations (S&Ls) However in the 80s short term …show more content…

These agencies used their own statistical models to rate the MBSs. They also rated the CDO entities and underwriters. There was competition between two major rating agencies- Moody’s and S&P. Moody’s was accused of being tough and conservative. It ultimately had to relax its standards in order to get more business. Another major problem with the rating agencies was that they could be influenced by the powerful and influential people who were behind major investment banks and hedge funds. Who’s responsible? A crisis of such magnitude cannot be brought about by the actions of one player. The subprime crisis is a result of the actions/behavior of a number of factors. Who’s to be blamed most is a difficult question to answer. Was it the lenders who gave out mortgage loans to subprime customers at higher rates, or was it the borrowers themselves who borrowed beyond their means and did not actually understand the features of the mortgages. And what about the underwriters and insurers who gave the tranches better ratings through credit enhancement tools. It was these guarantees that made the investors more confident. The Financial System: Thus the economy trusted that the matured markets would govern themselves leading to lose regulation. But as the crisis unfolded, it was quiet evident the markets were not doing what they were supposed to. Everyone, be it the lenders, borrowers, underwriters, insurers or investors, believed that the housing bubble

Get Access