preview

Summary Of Those Of My Blood By Constance Bouchard

Good Essays

Constance Bouchard, the author of Those of My Blood, contrives a well-organized text defining five major ideas that provide the basis of her argument throughout the book. Bouchard clearly examines primary and secondary sources finding conclusive evidence that most of the nobility was emphasized by the male line, however, this does not eliminate women from pedigrees. She also includes in her thesis father-son inheritance was not well-established until the eleventh or twelfth century. She generates her arguments solely based on the role of “family” and questions the origins of old versus new nobility. She continues in the following context by associating women’s functions within the nobility, as well as, political changes in family structure, …show more content…

Women were still somewhat viewed as inferior to males, however, maternal blood was accounted for in cases where her relatives were more closely related to the highest levels of elites. In this, the sources reference how even though women of higher nobility were somewhat relevant, their names still corresponded with the paternal line. She uses the Carolingian dynasty, including Charlemagne, as a prime example of this naming custom. He would have two daughters with his second wife, Fastrada and name them, “Hiltrudis after his paternal aunt and Theodrada after his cousin (paternal lineage).”7 In addition, Bouchard continues to reference other naming patterns from different royal families. Similarly, the Robertians/Capetians practiced naming their daughters for themselves rather than their wives. King Robert I had a daughter named Adela and her name was “based on a 907 charter of Charles the Simple.”8 Bouchard concludes these naming customs as normal patterns, and evidently, kings named their daughters after their own. Naming patterns differed between each royal family, as there was no proper bylaw stating who or what she needed to be named after. Moreover, she continues to expand on the roles of women through the migration of their names in the upper nobility. Bouchard presents the migration of names changing over time by picking unusual names, thus …show more content…

As the eleventh-century approached, an era of transfiguration was taking place. Social and institutional changes occurred due to the newfound “feudal” age. Bouchard supports her argument stating peasants relinquished slavery in the tenth-century, only to have to accept a new kind of feudalism.10 In addition, she depicts the controversy debated by scholars about this “feudal” era, and how it transforms nobility. An abrupt appearance of these social structures challenges every argument Bouchard has made in the text; this also challenges her main thesis of a patrilineal

Get Access