Hunting, the American sport that we have enjoyed since our very beginning. Hunting has been around so long, that to most it is simply a part of life. But even so, the sport has taken fire recently from conservationists claiming that it is inhumane and cruel. Hunting is not only more inhumane than not hunting, but it is also a necessary part of the American ecosystem and economy. Hunting offers a reliable way of controlling a population of animals in order to mitigate environmental damage. These populations, whether they are native or invasive, often cause catastrophic damage to the environment if they are not properly managed. In a study done by The Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, The United States Forest Service, and The …show more content…
With approximately 13 million hunters as of 2001, each requiring gear, hunting tags, ammunition, and other service, they almost certainly have a large economic impact. According to a study compiled by The International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, hunting generates over 67 billion dollars in economic output, creates over one million jobs, and generates 2.4 billion in federal tax revenue. The Vice-President of the agency that composed the article was later quoted saying ‘‘And most elected officials don’t realize the conservation contributions and economic power of hunters and the hunting business’’ (John Baughman). Seeing how people still want to greatly restrict or ban hunting, it would appear that Baughman is correct. If hunting was banned, it wouldn’t only punish the hunters, but it would drain tens of billions of dollars from the economy each …show more content…
‘‘Impacts of White-Tailed Deer Overabundance in Forest Ecosystems: An
Overview.’’ Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry,United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Jun. 2008. Web. 13 Apr. 2017.
‘‘Economic Importance of Hunting in America.’’ International Association of Fish and Wildlife
Agencies. 2002. Web. 27 Apr. 2017.
Meister, Christina. ‘‘Service Distributes $1.1 Billion to state Wildlife Agencies to Support Conservation,
Outdoor Recreation, and Job Creation.’’ United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 7 Mar. 2016. Web. 1 May.
2).With 12.5 million hunters in the United States, it seems as though most families have a reason to support hunting rights in country. Safety is a top propriety; new younger hunters are now required to pass a gun hunting safety class. The safety class deals with such issues as proper handling of a firearm, and safety issues and how one must never point a gun at anything that the hunter does not want to kill.“The hunter education course instills in students the knowledge and skill to be a responsible and safe hunter. The basic course consists of 10 lessons during a minimum of 10 hours. Students learn how hunting accidents are caused and how they can be prevented. Hunter responsibility and safety are stressed throughout the classes, which consist of lectures, demonstrations, group discussions, practical exercises, and individual study and activity assignments” (Wisconsin department of natural resources, 2009, p.1). Hunting is also important to the economy of the country in 2006, [125 million hunters entered the woods spending $22.9 billion that would have not went into the economy without hunting. Total cost of hunting equipment for hunting was $10.7 Billion](“2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation,” 2006). Which would not have went to local business without hunting. Hunting is not just a pastime in the United States; it is big business
Sports hunting has always been, and always will be, a controversial topic. Most people who view sports hunting as unacceptable and vile for our environment are uneducated about the positive outcome it brings. The anti-hunting groups do not understand what all our hunters actually do for our environments. Most anti-hunter activist will argue that hunters gain pleasure from unnecessary suffering. What most people do not understand is that, hunters are some of the most supporting environmentalist you will ever meet. Hunters help provide, control, and conserve for our environment.
Hunting is a common activity all around the world, and if performed properly, can have many benefits to us and the rest of the planet. The art of hunting has been around since the beginning of time. Living off of the land used to be a necessity across the world, until the mass production of food came along. In America, people do not usually need to hunt to survive. However, the population of animal species needs to be controlled. Too many of one type of animal can cause a drastic change to any ecosystem. Food supplies decline quickly, leaving many animals without food. Hunting can help keep the population of a group of animals at a good number, making the lives of the other
Hunting and fishing have been a part of the past and present of America and all around the world for as far back as the world dates. As far back as we can date, people have always hunted and fished. Back then they needed to because people need food to survive. Now hunting and fishing are starting to become sports. You may think that hunting and fishing can harm the environment, but there are many positive things about them. Hunting and fishing can have some positive effects and negative effects on the environment and economy, so if you don’t really agree with hunting and fishing maybe these facts will change your mind.
“Hunting is good for the environment because one it helps keep down on the deer herd and other animals that are hunted.”(Smith) ”When you hunt you help herds of animals from getting to over populated. When the deer herds are kept to a lower number there is less likely of a chance for diseases to start to get spread around in return killing off a lot of the deer herd. Hunting to keep down on the deer herd also helps prevent interbreeding. When there gets to be too many deer in one herd there is a good possibility that interbreeding can occur and then birth defects could occur as well as health problems. When deer herds are kept to a low number there is not as much of a chance for deer and vehicle crashes to happen. When there is smaller deer herds that are controlled by hunting the
Hunting is a sport that men and women around the world have enjoyed for centuries. However, today there is so much controversy over whether it is ethical or beneficial for animals to be hunted. People who do not support hunting are not aware of the benefits it offers for not only the hunter, but also the animal population. There are hunting seasons, specific types of guns the hunters can use, the time sportsmen can hunt, and many other rules that keep sportsmen from hunting unfairly or overhunting. Sportsmen must buy license and tags to hunt legally, which keeps many people from hunting. The people who go against these regulations face heavy fines and in some cases, jail time. People who do not support hunting probably are not aware that because
I personally agree that hunting is extremely necessary. I think that whether it's for food or for a sport it doesn't make a difference. I hunt so I can personally say that it is important and I can see why some people enjoy it. It takes a variety of skills and a lot of patients. It also does keep animal populations down which lowers the amount of road killed deer. This is extremely beneficial for drivers because when you hit a deer it can do a lot of damage to the vehicle and endanger the occupants of the
Hunting has been around for as long as people have been on this earth and if that were taken away completely some people would lose that sense of nature to hunt. Hunting is people who kill animals for food, clothing, or sport. In 2011 13.7 million people, 6% of the U.S. population 16 years old and older, hunted. Big game like elk, deer and wild
In a civilized and cultivated country, wild animals only continue to exist at all when preserved by sportsmen”("MARC FOLCO: Some hunting, fishing quotes to live by"). Hunters are the leading source for all conservation programs. Theodore Roosevelt was one of the most passionate hunters. People put down hunting like it’s a bad thing. Many hunters contribute billions of dollars the the economy. Hunting should not be banned because of the positive impacts it has on society.
The state legislature has favored the ranching industry above ecology and continues to do so. Public polls “conducted by Boise State indicate that the overwhelming majority of Idahoans (nearly 70 percent) support wolf restoration” (Laverty, par. 4) and the legislature is seeking to remedy this by re-educating the public with “a balanced view of the impact of wolves on big game species, those sectors of the economy dependent upon sport hunting, livestock, domestic animals, and humans” (State, 3). Furthermore, the “cost of wolf reintroduction will be presented as a part of any public education program including direct and indirect costs” (State, 3).
Environmental groups began pressuring the government for new forest management legislation. The health of the forests, and the wild life habitat the forest provides became a highly debatable subject. Timber harvests began to decline as a result to the conservation litigation and political matters that were brought to light. To this end, the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP), which was federally founded in 1994, was designed to restrict timber harvests in order to protect endangered species that dwell in old growth forests (Zielinski, 2012). Further, the NWFP provided a guide for a much regimented forest management style of our forest lands. Pendulums do swing though and there is a building dissatisfaction with federal land management today, as unmanaged forests burn up and rural communities have no jobs base (Zielinski, 2012).
“Hunting and ecosystem-based management is the smartest and most cost-effective way to manage our wildlife. The basic idea of ecosystem-based management is that you manage ecosystems rather than specific species or disciplines.” For example “you do not mange pheasants as much as you manage the ecosystem in which the pheasants live. If the ecosystem is improved, it will produce more pheasants naturally.”(1)
The deer and elk population is growing at an alarming rate. According to Outdoor Life, the "Whitetail deer population grew from 29.8 million in 1994 to 32.7 million today." According to Garth Kidd, the solution to this overgrowth problem is hunting. If we were to get rid of hunting,
In addition to positively managing populations, hunting is also safe, effective and inexpensive to taxpayers. In fact, hunting is inexpensive to taxpayers because people hunt for free. Moreover, some hunters believe that killing the animal is more ethical than letting it die of starvation. In regards to safety, hunting has a lower injury rate than more common sports like football and cycling.
Hunting is an extremely controversial topic in the world today. Hunting is the pursuit of a game species that is typically use for food or other practices. On average people who hunt, use the animals they kill for food purposes. Some people think that people hunt for only pleasure. However, hunting is good for the environment and allows animals to thrive. Hunting is a good thing that helps the economy, conservation, job market, and environment.