Gartner Case Study Gartner Incorporation is a supplier of market research and advisory services for players within the information technology industry. The firm derives value by recommending solutions to vexing and difficult problems facing clients. The firm was founded 1979 with the vision of providing IT establishment with useful insights for guiding their decision-making process. The organization is located in Stamford (Connecticut), in the United States. Gartner has 4400 employees. The turnover of the company was 1279 million in US dollars in the last financial year. Gartner’s Problems Gartner Incorporation has two distinct problems; fierce competition and poor employee performance. These problems have posed a danger to the …show more content…
Secondly, innovation within the organization has deteriorated over the past few years of operation. This decline is attributed to the underperformance of the employees. Employees rag behind those of other companies in terms of coming up with new ideas, products and model of doing business. The organization is struggling in its current model of business. There is also a high turnover of employees. Gartner is losing quality analysts to competitors hence affecting the performance of the organization. There is also a limited sharing of information, knowledge and experience within the organization. Poor performance of the organization’s human resource is hampering the competitiveness of Gartner. Applying Model Gartner needs to change the business model and its human resource practices so as to address the two problems. According to Kotter’s Change Model, the first stage in managing change is to establish a sense of urgency. In this case, Gartner’s change leaders need to highlight the weaknesses of the organization and explain the need for change. The change leaders should then build a coalition for spearheading the change process. A single person cannot develop a comprehensive understanding of Gartner’s problem (Lunenburg, 2010). Therefore, the change leader needs to work with a team that includes all key stakeholders. The team should include representatives from different departments with the organization, key clients, and experts in the IT industry. The third
In the area of weaknesses, the biggest challenge was employee turnover. Even with the recession and the current job market good talent could and can be found, but it is hard to retain with the current compensation and benefit plans offered
Foreword by Spenser Johnson: One the surface, the story of this book appears to be a fable that is relatively easy to grasp, but it does subtly impart an invaluable lesson on change. The book covers John Kotter’s Eight Steps to bring about successful organizational change and can be equally useful for a high-school student as it is for a CEO of a multi-national organization.
Kotter’s 8-Step approach to transformational change begins with creating a sense of urgency. Creating a sense of urgency involves examining markets and competitive realities and identifying and discussing crises, potential crises, or major opportunities (Weiss, 2012). At its peak, Microsoft was at the forefront of computing technology. This position led to “overnight millionaires” that eventually skewed the perspective of the once eager employees. Long time executives ended up letting new employees handle everything while they waited for the next windfall. Instead of continuing a momentum of innovation, they [Microsoft] had allowed themselves to reach a plateau while the competition past them by. Innovation gave way to employees
Step 2 is forming a powerful guiding coalition. Leadership will have to be on board and on the same page in regards to the change. Kotter and Cohen reveal the core problems people face when leading change. Their main findings are that the central issue concerns not structure or systems but behavior and how to alter it (Farris, 2008). The success of the changes will depend on the ability of the managers to show their commitment to change and motivate the employees to do the same. Without any process to track the implementation, the change can also fail.
The Burke-Litwin Model seeks to explain the processes and influences by which organizational change occurs. The organizational change process is driven by twelve different factors. The factors are integrated, such that a change in one factor will have an effect on all of the other factors. The team at CGIAR took this approach to their change program, focusing on a few factors that they believed were the key drivers of change. The twelve different factors are the external environment as the key input, mission & strategy, leadership, organizational culture, structure, management practices, work unit climate, systems, task and individual skill, motivation, individual needs and performance, and individual and organizational performance as the key output. Their efforts were focused specifically on changing the organizational culture, which they felt would result in changes to many other aspects of the organization.
Part three of the book “Beyond the Wall of Resistance” has two chapters and the title of part three is, “Narrowing the Gap the Next Time”. The first nine chapters of this book gave information on planning and implementing successful change. The final two chapters expand the information on change as it relates to hiring, monitoring the work of consultants, and selecting people to lead within the organization. Chapter ten, entitled “Expanding Your Ability to Apply What You’ve Learned”, gives a range of ways to apply the Cycle of Change and the three levels of support and resistance.
Businesses have to adapt to the ever-changing economy. It is not much of a choice for business leaders to change elements of their organization to stay in competition with their peers. The hardest part, most of the time, is changing the people in the organization to develop the necessary outcome or goal. As a business leader getting rid of people or changing their job specifics is one of the many responsibilities they have to be comfortable performing. Organizations have to take into consideration their competitors, customers, shareholders, employees, and the community to make decisions. Change is an aspect that many people are afraid of. In the new millennium, organizational leaders have to embrace
Organized Change Consultancy. (2010). Re-engineering and TQM: Approaches to Organizational Change . Available: http://www.organizedchange.com/village.htm. Last accessed 2nd January 2014.
Return on assets has declined from 19 % to 14 % in six years. The decreasing efficiency is mainly attributed to international operations. High employee satisfaction scores, both domestically and internationally, indicates a highly motivated work force. Turnover rate of 25 % is pointing in a different direction. Training and internal recruitment provides good environment for learning, innovation and growth.
Week 3, the lecture on Managing Change describes organizational changes that occur when a company makes a shift from its current state to some preferred future state. Managing organizational change is the process of planning and implementing change in organizations in such a way as to decrease employee resistance and cost to the organization while concurrently expanding the effectiveness of the change effort. Today's business environment requires companies to undergo changes almost constantly if they are to remain competitive. Students of organizational change identify areas of change in order to analyze them. A manager trying to implement a change, no matter how small, should expect to encounter some resistance from within the organization.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss organizational change and the management of that change. I will talk about the different drivers of change, the factors a leader needs to weigh to implement change effectively, the various resistances a leader may encounter while trying to implement change, and how various leadership styles will effect the realization of change. I will also discuss the knowledge I have gained through the completion of this assignment and how I think it might affect the way I manage change in my workplace.
Change has become necessary for every organisation there is. World is moving rapidly towards better technologies, efficient systems, new techniques, compact profits, different friendlier environments and organisations are always in the race to reach new heights by thriving effectively in this competitive environment (Kotter, 1996).
Change happens in all aspects of life. Leaders view change as being good most of the time. An organization can’t move forward without change. This paper will discuss how leaders can use levels of change and the steps of Kotter’s change model to implement change. It will also give a Christian worldview as it pertains to the topics. Leader must learn the language to effectively communicate change. This will give managers an advantage and help demonstrate the vision for the future.
In the review of the book, “Making Change Work: Practical Tools for Overcoming Human Resistance to Change,” I decided to summarize the major steps the book establishes. It discusses how to begin the change process by understanding your need for change, to the final step of the change process where an organization needs to implement changes. After summarizing the steps, I am going to show how the book relates to the textbook, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, as well as giving a managerial implication.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.