Rosario Acero S.A. Teaching Note Synopsis and Objectives In March 1997, the board’s chair of this small steel mill was pondering how to finance the growth of his firm: either with an initial public offering (IPO) of equity or through a private placement of eight-year senior notes with warrants. The task for the student is to sort out the comparative advantages and disadvantages of each alternative—including valuing the possible securities—and then recommend a course of action. These are the objectives of this case: Survey the main considerations in the basic choice between debt and equity financing. The case allows an application of the classic FRICTO (flexibility, risk, income, control, timing, and other) framework, as well as …show more content…
The forecasts are premised on a revenue growth rate of 10.3% and the historical percentage-of-sales figures for expenses and most balance sheet accounts. The 10.3% rate of growth is drawn from the case. It is consistent with that of similar companies and with trends in the Latin American steel industry.2 Other assumptions are summarized in the exhibits. The notes payable balances in case Exhibits 7 and 10 reveal that either financing alternative will satisfy the firm’s funds requirements through 2002. The instructor can question the students as to the following circumstances that might cause an adverse change in the fundamental assumptions: Increased price competition: Resulting in lower margins and/or higher accounts receivable. As the Mercosur trade group matures, competition inside the region may well intensify. Labor difficulties: Resulting in strikes, higher wages, or adverse work rules. Though Argentina’s labor unions have weakened slightly in recent years, the country has had a tradition of confrontational labor relations. Another small steel manufacturer, Picasso Acero, has just sustained a long strike and strike-related vandalism. Increased growth: Though the assumed annual
The company position is strong enough so its better that company should use debt financing instead of equity financing.
Three interrogations were thus to answer. Should the company provide investors with classic bonds or give them the opportunity to convert them into equity? Should they structure the offer with a fixed or a floating coupon rate? And last but not least, where should they locate the operation?
* Our company’s sales forecast has been based on performance from previous years along with market circumstances. We are looking at the future of the business objectively which we then can evaluate past to
5) In late December 1995, sell-side analysts were forecasting long-term growth of 25-40% for the craft-brewing segment. How achievable are these growth targets? What factors are likely to influence analysts’ growth
From 1976 to 1982 the compound annual growth in net sales was 18.5% and the compound annual growth of after tax profit was 25.9%. Therefore, a 10% net sales growth shown in the proforma financial data seems reasonable.
Using the assumptions given in the case, all elements of income statement and balance sheet can be projected for next three years 2010, 2011 and 2012. Sales cycle of the products of the company is such that sales of a particular product increases initially for few years and then starts to decline as the new technology
5) In late December 1995, sell-side analysts were forecasting long-term growth of 25-40% for the craft-brewing segment. How achievable are these growth targets? What factors are likely to influence analysts’ growth
1. In the last five years the growth in sales for the company has been around 10% per annum, except for the 1997, the growth was 18.78%. In the case, nothing is mentioned that company has made any drastic changes in its strategy to grow faster. In such a scenario, projected a consistent growth of 20% per annum for the next 5 years is too optimistic.
1. Current liabilities 2. Usual valuation of long-term liabilities 3. Disclosure notes 4. Long-term liabilities 5. Commercial paper
Assuming the company does not invest in the new product line; prepare forecasted income statements and balance sheets at year-end 2010, 2011, and 2012. Based on these forecasts, estimate Flash's required external financing: in this case all required external financing takes the form of additional notes payable from its commercial bank, for the same period.
For current assets for each of the following three years, we are projecting the same percentage of 32% of sales. Assets that are constantly flowing in and out of a organization in the normal course of its business as cash converted into goods and then back into cash show small growth if any, in periods of time. The assets that are expected to last or be in use for less than one year will also show the small growth if any due their usage life expectancy. Because of these facts of our current assets, we will continue to use the projected 32% of sales as in previous years. Because this projection served correctly in previous years, we will again use it for the next three years. This decision is based on past accurateness and the consistency of the company.
Corporate financial decision is a crucial component of strategies that firms adopt to access funds in the external capital market to undertake new investment, for dividend payments, to maintain capital structure, for acquisition purposes, cash savings as precaution, among others. UniHost Corporation; the largest motel and hotel franchise in Canada is faced with a requirement to raise capital. UniHost is involved in the development, syndication, franchising and management of motels and hotels in Canada of which most are flagged under the Quality and Comfort brands. There are several options that the corporation can apply to raise capital ranging from debt financing, convertible bonds and high yield debt (DeThomas, 1992). The strengths of these financial options are outlined and the reasons for their recommendation in this situation are outlined in the succeeding paragraphs.
The course project involved developing a great depth of knowledge in analyzing capital structure, theories behind it, and its risks and issues. Before I began this assignment, I knew nothing but a few things about capital structure from previous unit weeks; however, it was not until this course’s final project that came along with opening
If external financing is required, the “safest” securities, namely debt, are issued first. Although investors fear mispricing of both debt and equity, the fear is much greater for equity. Corporate debt still relatively little risk compared to equity because, if financial distress is avoided, investors receive a fixed return.. Thus, the pecking order theory implies that, if outside financing required, debt should be issued before equity. Only when the firm’s debt capacity is reached should the firm consider equity.
Already in 1958, Modigliani and Miller have pointed the discussion of capital structure towards the cost of debt and equity. According to their first proposition, in a world of no corporate taxes and with perfect markets, financial leverage has no effect on a firm’s value. In their second proposition, they state that the cost of equity equals a linear function defined by the required return on assets and the cost of debt (Modigliani and Miller, 1958).