Should TechSpectrum file suit against the competitor? How about against Gomex? Why or why not?
“Distributed Denial of Service Attacks – Who is Legally Liable?” is an interesting article provided good insight to address the liability side of the equation. A per US computer crime statute, 18 USC 1030 (a)(5)(A) punishes whomever, “knowingly causes the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a protected computer.” Thus in the case of TechSpectrum, both the competitor and Gomex can be held accountable, since all the elements of the clause were fulfilled. However the biggest challenge for TechSpectrum will be to prove legally that these two parties were actually involved in conspiracy and had an agreement.
In the article “Attack of the bots” the author talks about the international law when dealing with bot attacks. A typical bot attack uses agents residing on compromised computers to co-ordinate and attack, if these computers are all over the world then it’s going to be difficult, to excise jurisdiction and prosecute. The same article also talks about the financial aspect of the attack. If
…show more content…
http://www.securitycurrent.com/en/writers/mark-rasch/distributed-denial-of-service-attacks-who-is-legally-liable
Attack of the bot http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/14.11/botnet.html?pg=1&topic=botnet&topic_set= Should TechSpectrum sue the hired network experts who were unable to detect the issue? They had represented themselves as subject matter experts, however the agreements did not explicitly guarantee acorrect diagnosis.
What should TechSpectrum communicate publicly, if anything, about the incident, and why? Should it file anydocuments with any public regulatory or law enforcement agency on this matter?
Should TechSpectrum launch any cyber based retaliatory action against any party in this
Once we determined that the data breach did not occur on our network we worked with the
TechMall’s revenue streams are rather simplistic. They receive a $750 one time set-up fee from all new merchants added into the TechMall system and a $50 statement fee, or maintenance fee, per month from all members. In addition, they receive a fee on each sales transaction, which is variable based on the dollar volume of the merchant’s transactions. TechMall’s standard pricing schedule indicates this revenue stream to be in the form of a 2% commission on all items sold by member merchants with a maximum commission receivable of $200.
Years later, the police arrived to inform him informed of a recent breach in the Heartland Cafe network. Detectives on the scene checked and analyzed for any possible vulnerabilities, where Tom confessed that his POS reseller, franchisor and POS reseller neglected to tell Tom to conform with the updated PTS requirements. The investigators learned that Tom’s scans originated from a different location and confirmed that the Heartland Cafe was a victim. While Tom was updating his security measures, he temporarily shut down Heartland Cafe in order to address this issue.
The third step I would take is to obtain witness statements from my employees and others who had noticed the incident. I will ask them to
T.L.O. was a high school student at Piscataway in Middlesex County. She was caught smoking in the lavatory by a teacher, and was taken to the Assistant Vice Principal Theodore Choplick who searched her purse after he suspected cigarettes. Mr. Choplick discovered cigarettes, small amount of marijuana, and a list that contained students’ names who are owning her money. T.L.O was charged with possession of marijuana. Before the trial, T.L.O. moved to suppress the evidence found during the search, but the court denied her motion. The juvenile and domestic relations court of New Jersey found her guilty and sentenced her to one-year probation. On appeal, the Superior court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed the denial of motion to suppress
BugUSA, Inc. - Case ScenarioThis scenario presents the case of BugUSA, Inc.; as a team, we endeavor to address the legal ramifications of each company's activities. BugUSA, Inc. has legal rights to intellectual property protection, and this paper explores the options available within that realm. WIRETAP, Inc. will face civil liability claims if caught in its underhanded measures, and possibly a civil RICO suit; BugUSA's security guard Walter, however, has also created a case against its own interests. When another company owns the rights to a web domain that suits BugUSA's needs, it faces the challenge of how to acquire the domain with as little hassle and as much protection as possible. A robbed vendor may present new tort liabilities for
Techfite has a Clan culture, meaning that its focus is put on it’s employees. Employee satisfaction, fulfillment, and growth are the primary focuses. In a Clan Culture employees form long standing bonds and it can feel like a family environment. At Techfite, the high value is also put on innovation within the company. They aim to embolden their employees by giving them the flexibility to innovate and explore. This amount of leeway employees are given, in combination with the relationships they form with one another, lead to extremely satisfied and loyal employees. However, because the focus is not on the customer, this can lead to lower profits margins and growth rates (Kinicki & Fugate, 2015).
Unfortunately, you cannot be added to the 2.0 Tech Team since, you're not a COR (Contracting Officer Representative) for K-BOSSS and contractual information is deemed, confidential w/ restricted access for designated trained personnel throughout the Brigade.
The basic problem is to ignore what was found and report the breach of security. With that said, there are some issues that should be addressed such as 1) Will I report the discovery or accept SGT Day's approach to the matter? 2) If I report on this, who should I report the issue to, and how and when should I report the issue? 3) Should I just discuss the discovery with SFC Sharp, before I go ahead with any other decisions? The ethical questions I have identified now challenge me to identify what "ought" to be done, what is "right" or "wrong" or the possible "good" vs. "bad" when determining guilt or innocence. The main issue now is what are the consequences to each person involved if I do or do not report the matter?
Cospros per person with a high number of not-for-profit organizations competing for resources in a community. Many organizations other revenue sources to increase individual and corporate dollar target. Based on this challenge, Cospros it successfully meets the needs of the community effectively in a way that, with short and long-term benefits for participants that provides a meaningful experience must continue to perform . The following summary of the potential opportunities relations:
1) How have Cisco’s channels evolved in the last 10-15 years? Why have they evolved that way?
So what should Paul, the CEO, do? First, he had better get off that sofa and give up the vain hope that IT can restore the system and get the hospital running again. Paul should also be in high communication mode with all of his constituents. He should understand that in today’s networked environment there are absolutely no secrets. Any IT breach forces an organization to ask, How much should we disclose about this threat? In
Looking for a wonderful company to help with your IT demands? The advantage of hiring us is that we have more experience than your average company. Adkins Tech has more than 13 years of industry experience, which has led to unparalleled customer service. Not to mention, we are constantly updating our knowledge to guarantee world class IT services that will make a huge difference. What can we do for your company?
Maestro Tech is a Web Designing and Development company provides prospective customers with comprehensive web solutions under one roof with impeccable and impressive web site designs.
Aspen Technology,Inc.: Currency Hedging Review History and Overview • Specialized in the development of simulation software for customer in process manufacturing industries • Advanced System for Process Engineering (ASPEN) project conducted at the Massachusetts Intitutes of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge Massachusetts, from 1976 to 1981 • Founded in 1981 by Dr. Larry Evans, a professor of chemical engineering at MIT • Larry Evans"leadership in the development and application of integrated systems for modeling, simulation and optimization of industrial chemical process History and Overview • In 1982 its first year of operations, AspenTech lost USD565,000 on sales of USD182,000 • Over next 13 years AspenTech’s