preview

Terrorism Has Been Used For Centuries As A Weapon Of Change

Decent Essays

Terrorism has been used for centuries as a weapon of change. Terrorism used to force change even altered the English language, the creation of the word assassin because of the Hashhashin’s in the 11th century and the Roman’s use of decimation changing the meaning from killing one in ten to massacring all involved. Much of early terrorism was based on nationalist or ethnic groups, which had exhausted all other options while reaching for political freedom and therefore resorted to violence. The most common examples used to justify terrorism are the French and American Revolutions, the overthrowing of the Russian Tsars, or when colonies fought for independence from their parent countries. It is argued that these were not a form of terrorism …show more content…

To attempt to understand terrorism and pass judgment on it one must look to the origin of the word itself. The word terrorism was first used during the “Reign of Terror” that happened after the French Revolution. The French word it is based on meant “one frightens” and primarily referred to state-sponsored acts. Although the current official definition of terrorism has remained mostly unchanged for decades it does not construe the use of fear and harm to non-combatants to force change be it political or not. The international community’s inability to precisely define what terrorism is further muddies the waters. The United Nations General Assembly in 1994 did record: “Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the general public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that may be invoked to justify them.”
This characterization lends weight that there is never an act of terrorism that can be justified. Furthermore, according to this the French and American Revolutions cannot be considered acts of terrorism, as they did not intend to “provoke a state of terror” even as they used violence

Get Access