The Affordable Care Act : A Catalyst For Payment And Delivery System Reform

Healthcare is often driven by consumers and insurance companies; there is strong pushes for insurance companies to start paying better through Patient Care Medical Homes (PCMH) or Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) rather than paying at a per-visit basis (Hamlin, 2015). With PCMH or ACOs payment is made on a continuum of care, encouraging the provider to be involved in all aspects affecting health of the patient (Derksen, & Whelan,

ACO, another 3 letter health care organization consisting of integrated groups of providers, comes along promising the elusive goal of reducing health care cost, improving population health, and bolstering custom satisfaction. Sounds like a perpetual remake of a 70s movie called HMO that went through several reiterations over the past decades which gave us PPO, PSO, IDS, and the different flavors of MCOs. ACO’s hype is credited to the Affordable Care Act as it sought to reduce health care costs is by encouraging doctors, hospitals and other health care providers to form networks that coordinate patient care and become eligible for bonuses when they deliver that care more efficiently. Bottom line, providers are promised to make more if they

The Accountable Care Organization (ACO) are groups of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high-quality care to their Medicare patients (McCarty, B., 2016). For example, Medicare Shared Savings Program was created by The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services to monitor and establish that all ACO’s are meeting the quality performance benchmarks and reduce Medicare spending by certain percentages (H., 2017). The growth of ACO’s from 2011 to 2016 is astonishing, in 2011 there was 64 ACO’s and by 2016 they have risen to 838 in the U.S. (H., 2017).

Hospitals should be encouraged to participate because improving hospital care is likely to be essential to success (McClellan et al, 2010). Accountable care organizations can be implemented through different payment models. These could include opportunities to share in demonstrated savings within a fee-for-service environment, in which providers took on no new financial risk. They could also include limited or substantial capitation arrangements, in which payments were unrelated to the volume of services provided, to the intensity of service use, or to the frequency of face-to-face meetings, and in which providers took on some financial risk for poor-quality results or failure to control costs (McClellan et al,

The health restructuring dispute has centered on compensating providers particularly more when delivering quality care to their patients than for enhancing the volume of services they provide (Ries, 2014) Accountable care organizations (ACOs) is a single proposed way of altering compensation methods to accomplish this objective by generating encouragement to enhance care coordination and clinical integration (Thygeson, Frosch, and Carman, 2014).

The accountable care organization I researched is called the Physician Organization of Michigan ACO (POM ACO). The POM ACO is a joint venture of the U-M Health System and physician groups around the state, with the aim of improving care for 81,000 Michiganders enrolled in traditional Medicare and slowing the growth of health care costs, according to the announcement by the U-M Health System (Daly, 2013). The group was launched on January 1, 2013 under the Medicare Shared Savings Program. 12 physician organizations from around Michigan came together to take part in a Medicare-sponsored program that strives to improve on the quality of care for traditional Medicare recipients, while also containing cost growth. In 2014, POM ACO expanded to include all the University of Michigan faculty physicians and thousands of other providers from the University of Michigan Health System. The POM ACO is now one of the largest accountable care organizations nationwide. More than 5,700 physicians and other providers are now involved in the POM ACO. Therefore, the POM ACO is organized as a physician-hospital organization. Hence, the patient has more flexibility in where and how their care is delivered. The patient can still use any doctor or hospital that accepts Medicare at any time.

​Kaiser Health News recently published an article on a new trend in healthcare. This trend introduces the Accountable Care Organization (ACO). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services defines it as “groups of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high quality care to their Medicare patients” (“Accountable Care Organization,” 2015). According to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the goal of the ACO is to be able to share health cost-savings with providers who are able to save money by eliminating unnecessary procedures and reduce health costs while increasing quality of care. ACOs make health professionals become more accountable in maintaining good-quality, coordinated healthcare for a patient through a value-based system that is evaluated through a number of criteria and benchmarks (Ronai, 2011).

Accountable care organizations are growing. Accountable Care or Coordinated Care is putting consumers at the front at our evolving healthcare industry. Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) strive to improve outcomes and reduce costs with improved patient care coordination (Robinson, J. C., Schaffer, L. D. 2015). Coordinated Care is defined as the Right care, at the right time, with no duplication, and to prevent errors. The Affordable Care Act encourages health care organizations to improve quality of care and reduce spending. In 2013, there were 320 ACO’s and as of 2014 there are now 700. 2/3 of the population now live in an area that services ACO’s. One out of three hospitals have ACO plans (Perficient Inc. 2015).

CMS defines ACOs as “groups of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high quality care to their Medicare patients.” The goal of coordinated care is, “to ensure that patients, especially the chronically ill, get the right care at the right time, while avoiding unnecessary

According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the United States spent $3 trillion on health care in 2014 and the projected growth in health spending for 2015 – 2025 is 5.8 percent per year (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2015). The prior CMS administrator, Dr. Donald M. Berwick stated in 2011 that 20 to 30 percent of health care spending did not provide any benefit to patients (Perez, 2014). Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) was created as a strategy to suppress the rising cost and waste of health care by implementing change in the way providers deliver care.

Even although, the cost of the health care system and the care it offers my not allow the national debt to decline to a level that will or would enhance the economy forward the cost of running a system that is backed by the government is too costly, and it will not help the deficit. , the legal responsibility of the organization is that every patron should have the same treatment for the same ailment. There are no predetermined dispositions; everyone is eligible as a government-backed facility. The funds are to assure those who have no insurance are covered. The accountable care

The American health care system has been victim to an escalation in the prices of health care services juxtaposed with inefficiency in delivery of care services. There has even been cases where State spending on the actual health care increased dramatically in the United States and one of the key components of curbing this problem which has been prevalent over the mass media and has been a major discussion among physicians is the advent of Accountable Care Organizations. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) is structured with the goal of trying to improve health care delivery and aid in the reduction of the overall cost of services (Weissert & Weissert, 2012). If there is insufficient coordination of high quality care delivery in the health care industry, this will have a negative impact on patient safety and diminish affordable care for patients. Hence, the development of ACOs is envisioned to be the savior of medical practices and can improve the overall fabric of the American society (Bresnick, 2013). ACOs serves as one of the answers for curbing the problem of high costs, low quality care and possible segmented delivery and as much as it serve as the major determinant for improvement in patient satisfaction, there are minor

There are many types of healthcare plans in the United States. Two types of care are Managed Care Organizations (MCO) and Accountable Care Organizations (ACO). Today the drawback of MCOs are, the features of consumer-driven healthcare plan (CDHP), the difference between HMO and PPO plans verses CDHP, and the features of ACOs that control cost and improve quality of care.

The Accountable Care Organization and Patient Centered Medical Home in these case studies did best by assuring patient satisfaction through quality care that is affordable. In the article Improving Our Nation’s Healthcare System written by Meeker, Watkins, Kranz, Munsterman, and Johnson, (2014) they state the United States is searching for ways

Managed care was established in order to manage health care cost, utilization, and quality (Kongstvedt, 2015). In managed care, health insurance is provided through HMO, PPO, and other types of managed care. It has the potential to reduced health care spending and improved the quality of care. However, despite of its success in improving the quality of care through preventive health care services, chronic disease management program, and so forth, many physicians are reluctant to be part of the managed care environment. Some of the reasons are the impact of managed care to physician’s income and autonomy. Under managed care, insurers have decreased the fees paid to physicians. There are different ways how managed care organizations control costs. One of this is through selective contracting with health care providers and hospitals to lower costs. In selective contracting, health care providers agreed to accept lower prices in exchanged for guaranteed volume of patients under managed care plan (Culyer, 2014). This paper will discuss more issues and trends in Managed Care Organizations such as the rise of Medicaid Managed Care spending, the new Medicaid Managed care Rule, and the collaboration of Managed Care Organizations and Accountable Care Organizations to reduce health care spending and improve efficiency of care.