The American Pageant Chapter 13 Apush

During the course of American History, and especially after the War for Independence, Nationalism and Sectionalism contributed and interacted with each other to shape the development of the United States of America. These two ideologies are the inverse of one another. When sectionalism is strong, nationalism is weak. When Nationalism is strong, sectionalism is weak. While sectionalism and nationalism work off of each other, nationalism has always prevailed over sectionalism in history. The inverse relationship and clash between the two forces can be seen through a number of different events or trends in history such as, economical

Colonizing is to establish or secure permanently a residence or it is, to become fixed, resolved, or established residence or colony. frontiers of inclusion is a border between two countries/a region that forms the margin of settled or developed territory

Their failure is attributable to the Republicans’ political skill and to the Federalists’ own incapacity or unwillingness to organize politically, their internal divisions (especially between supporters of Adams and Hamilton), and their aversion to compromising principles for the sake of winning elections. Furthermore, New England Federalists adopted a divisive policy of sectionalism, moving dangerously near secession in 1808 and strenuously opposing the War of 1812 (see Hartford Convention). By 1817 the party was practically dead, though the opposing Republicans had adopted the Federalists’ principles of nationality and had

A tendency to be more concerned with the interests of a particular group than with the problems of the whole is the definition of sectionalism. Since the United States gained it 's independence from Britain, sectionalism grew alongside the country. Differences in lifestyles and opinions drove a wedge between groups of people. What started off as two political parties butting heads gradually escalated to two parts of the country, the North and South, dueling against one another. These different viewpoints would then lead to the last war on American soil. Because of the opposing viewpoints and contrasting lifestyles between the North and South, tensions grew until their eventual falling apart.

There was a economic depression 1890’s that changed political alignments and attitudes. A sudden interest in partisan politics was shown by White American male voters. Also, many Southern states were disenfranchising Black men. Democrats emphasized decentralized power located in the states. The Republicans however, favored a more active national government. Many voters generally stayed loyal pre-Civil War beliefs, this caused stalemating national government. It was because of this that Northern states went Republican and Southern states went Democratic. The majority of governmental action and reform occurred at the state and local

In the late 1700’s, the political party known as The Federalists doubted the United States would become a great commercial power. The Federalist dominated the new government. According to the book, “Although no one welcomed them, the political parties gradually took shape” (Brands, H.W., Breen, T.H., Williams, B.H., and Gross, A.J. 170). The federalist encouraged a very rapid integration of the United States into a world economy, but however avid they were about capitalism, the Federalist nor the Republicans did not trust the people or local government to do the job adequately. They insisted on a modern economy, which would require a strong national society. In 1887, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote The Federalist. The name implied that the new government wouldn’t be a drastically different from the old government. It would still be a federal government, one in which the states would share power with the central government. These claims frightened persons who came to identify themselves as Jeffersonian’s, Republicans, or the anti-federalist.

According to Gale Group," Sectionalism is the belief in and support of political, social, and economic interests particular to a region or section of the country." In my own words, sectionalism is belonging to a specific region or group. Sectionalism has been present in America and American politics for many centuries. Even very recently sectionalism has impacted the outcomes of the US government elections and decisions. Basically, everything that happens in the US government is impacted by sectionalism in some way. Sectionalism can be found in many places, from the original colonies, to political parties, to current US politics.

The sectional division between North and South began in colonial times and resulted from geographical differences. In the South, the earliest

One of the major boosts to United States nationalism, began with the simple Union victory over the confederacy. Secession was unconstitutional according to those who supported the Union. By defeating the confederacy, the Union had only confirmed that fact. As well, the radical Republican reconstruction plan called for an official renunciation of secession, before states could be readmitted to the Union. If secession from the Union was now illegal, then Daniel Webster's theory of the Constitution being a people's government, and not a compact of states had to be true. "The Constitution . . . [begins] with the words 'We the people,' and it was the people, not the states, who . . . created it," Webster claimed in his nationalist theory of the Constitution. The Union became more united than ever before, because now it truly was a Union, ". . . now and forever, one and inseparable." There were

Another concern was that of sectionalism. The North felt “threatened both culturally and physically by the South.” The North was not as united as it looked, with varying ideas and opinions within the states and political party, but they also feared the power the South would gain

Regionalism allows for some voters to have more power with their votes, particularly Ontario and Quebec over other provinces thus furthering regional tension and divide.

The English arrangement for the year called for three noteworthy offensives with one originating from Canada, another striking at Washington, and the third hitting New Orleans. While the push from Canada was vanquished at the Clash of Plattsburgh by Commodore Thomas MacDonough and Brigadier General Alexander Macomb, the hostile in the Chesapeake area saw some accomplishment before being stopped at Fortification McHenry. A veteran of the last crusade, Bad habit Chief naval officer Sir Alexander Cochrane moved south that fall for the assault on New

In Catherine Sedgwick’s short story, “A Reminiscence of Federalism” the two main characters fall in love, but were separated by force due to a political divide between their families. This story took place Post American Revolution in early America where the political divide split the small village of Carrington Vermont in half. The divide was between the Federalists and the Democrats. The Democrats lived on the hill while the Federalists lived in the valley. At this time Federalists favored a strong central government while the Democrats thought to limit the role of the national government and favoring state government (Berg-Anderson, 1). The Federalists’ at this time mostly favored Jefferson or Adams while the democrats sided with Jackson

The Federalist Party was composed of Alexander Hamilton, their ideologies were in favor of a strong centralized government to strengthen the country. The historical context of the first two parties are essential particularly, the economic and social situation, because it displays a pattern that continues into the 20th century. Throughout the 20th century, the emergence and downfall of political parties was often tied to political and social

Her analysis of decentralization focuses on ethnic conflict and secessionism. Ethnic conflict is violence between ethnic groups and secessionism is the movement of people towards an independent state. The main focus of her paper is on regional parties within politically decentralized governments. Regional parties differentiate from a national political party in that a regional party focuses their efforts both in policy making and campaigning in a specific region within a state.