1. As BlueWater Power merged, changes were also occurring in Ontario’s energy markets that caused some issues. The deregulation of the market opened up many opportunities for the company; however, it first had to overcome many obstacles. For example, BlueWater had to overcome the challenges associated with the large scale merger of six local utilities. Another issue was that they had very limited IT resources throughout the deregulation process. Finally, they had to upgrade their outdated system. These were the obstacles present throughout the merger during Ontario 's deregulation of energy markets. A management factor was that responsible for the issues during the merger was combining the leaders of six organizations into one. BlueWater was now housing six major local utilities and had to find a way to manage and operate all of these utilities effective and efficiently without disturbing operations and cash flow. It was essential that management quickly combined the six organizations into one fully operational utility company, that could service more than 35,000 customers. An organizational factor was the small IT team that BlueWater had; there were only five employees trained with IT. This required the company to make sure that the ERP system they chose was easy to use and required little support, thus limiting their options for new ERP systems and potentially impacting the cost and sophistication of the system. A technological factor that contributed to the problems
On April 1, 1997, the merger with Atlantic Dairy Cooperatives was effective (Wilmes). It was a single discrete event. The merger was good news for the Land O’Lakes Inc. because the company became bigger which led to strong growth and expansion. Land O’Lakes Inc. celebrated this news and the Chief Executive Officer, Jack Gherty discussed about his bright vision for the future because “the merger will allow the company to provide greater long-term value and returns” to customers (Wilmes).
Since the gasoline and fuel oil shortages of the 1970’s, the topic of renewable energy has been
When companies combine/merge the whole objective is to gain new opportunities, gain market share, grow the business, to become more innovative and to improve product offerings, utilizing/sharing the existing resources and data. From the case
The American energy revolution has done more than just provide record amounts of oil and natural gas to fuel our transportation needs or generate electricity and heat our homes, schools and businesses. Increased American energy production has lowered the cost of energy and manufacturing feedstocks, which helps to cut energy and materials costs for American manufacturers, particularly producers of steel, chemicals, refined fuels, plastics, fertilizers and numerous consumer products. U.S. industrial electricity costs are 30 to 50 percent lower than those of our foreign competitors, according to a 2015 study from the Boston Consulting Group (BCG). American manufacturing costs are now 10 to 20 percent lower than those in Europe and could be 2 to
In this final assignment for Environmental Policy, Regulation, and Law, I will discuss the Energy Policy Act. This discussion will be geared toward the current usage of renewable energy with reference to the incentives created in the Energy Policy Act. The introduction into this topic will include a brief synopsis of the act’s history. Following the history of the Energy Policy Act, there will be a discussion and argument for the act and its present incentives for the use of renewable energy sources. In conclusion, the expected future of the Energy Policy Act and the closing argument for its regulation will be covered.
Market price per share: should be bigger or equal after the merger, which often is not the case.
The United States is in the middle of one of the biggest wealth transfers of wealth it has ever seen since the deregulation of long distance calling. This shift in wealth is seen in the deregulation of energy. What is energy? Energy can be described multiple ways but for the purposes of deregulation, energy is defined as power that is transferred from the environment and converted into electricity and gas to be used for electricity and heating.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 established what is the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). The RFS was later modified by means of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 and is now as we know it today. The purpose of the RFS is to form the requirement of specified volumes of renewable fuel to be used for certain means each year. Those means include transportation fuel, home heating oil, and jet fuel. The creation of the RFS allows for fuel to be distributed and used properly without there being any issues. Having this standard establishes a system that creates fair allocation and dispersal for fuel in all facets. Requirements are also put in place to enable a secure process for managing the fuel.
Microeconomic theory holds that for a market to be perfectly competitive, it needs to have the following three properties: 1) product sold must be uniform across all sellers, i.e. there’s no differentiation between producers; 2) there must be many buyers and sellers, such that no one seller or buyer can affect the market price; 3) all agents participating in the market have perfect information. As opposed to commodities that might be well suited for this perfect competition framework, electricity has unique features that make the framework less applicable. The chief differentiating characteristic of electricity is that it cannot be stored. Although some amounts could be stored in batteries, that is not enough to power a country. Electricity must be generated and transmitted as it is consumed (Perez Arriaga 2013). The implication for market mechanism is that supply and demand at a particular time period would balance not based on extra storage but on additional generation capacity available. Second, electricity is not a homogenous commodity. There’s a distinction between generators that supply power on a continual basis (e.g. electricity derived from coal, hydropower, nuclear power) and generators that are on only during peak hours (e.g. natural gas and oil-fired generators). Thus, generation sources are not perfect substitutes of one another. Third, the end-user of electricity is
Penetration of market: By merging, the new organization is supposedly furnished with access to more clients. This is actual if the individual organizations had been obviously fruitful in discrete markets, instead of generally just as contending in the same one.
According to Brown et.al (2012), “The consolidation was not completed when the final project plan was presented to the Board by March 1997 the company had committed to consolidate from seventeen small DCs to four large ones” (p.476). The integration had to work or personnel would claim that the company was no better off. The company could be harmed because other company initiative was on hole.
One major objective of mergers is to be able to reduce or fully eliminate the weaknesses that may exit in
Building off observations of political structure and derived stability in the previous paper I will, in this paper, apply lessons learned to the arena of energy policy in both Sweden and South Korea. South Korea and Sweden present the interesting similarity of both being net importers of energy resources and for that reason both having the real incentive of formulating some system of energy self-sufficiency to protect them from the dangers inherent to having an economy dependent on the imports from another country. I will begin with outlining the energy issues and subsequent policies being addressed in each country, followed by an in-depth examination on how the political structure of each country has affected the
Mergers always arise different types of problems, mainly the reason is because each company operation is based on different
For several years now the European Union, the largest regional trading block in the world, has been trying to liberalize its energy market, replacing the markets of its 27 member states with a single continent wide market for electricity and gas. The first phase of liberalization went into effect in June 2007. When fully implemented, the ability of energy producers to sell