In her revolutionary masterpiece, Silent Spring, Rachel Carson brilliantly and elegantly works to inform the public on the risks of carelessly using pesticides and insecticides as a sort of panacea for all pests and annoyances, and works to shed light on the damage that had already been done at the point of the book’s publication in 1962. As discussed in the book’s introduction by Al Gore, at the time of writing, Rachel Carson was enduring intense medical radiation and died, two years after publishing the book, of breast cancer - which has been found to be linked to toxic chemicals possibly coming from insecticides. That being said, Al Gore notes, “ In a sense, Carson was literally writing for her life,” but she was also writing, “against the …show more content…
When compared to Aristotle’s beliefs on persuasion and his three appeals, all three appeals can effortlessly be identified in SIlent Spring. In many of her chapters, Carson begins by appealing to the reader’s emotions (pathos) by either describing the unintended utter extermination of or harm to a well-loved plant or animal - such as the unexpected deaths of household cats in chapter 7 -, then continues to provide unarguable scientific evidence (logos) for such catastrophe - such as the adverse effects of the insecticide Aldrin (to keep up with the cat reference). Then, as if to seal the deal, Carson ends the chapter by posing a sort of ethical question (ethos) such as, “By acquiescing in an act that can cause such suffering to a living creature, who among us is not diminished as a human being?”(end of chapter 7), which not only seems to set the stage for the next chapter, but also leads the reader to reflect on the chapter as a whole and allows him or her to internalize the vast amount of information discussed in the chapter on a more personal and relevant level. Furthermore, though Al Gore notes that these, “emotion-fanning words,” were the basis of much criticism about Carson, it was this emotional level of her writing that captivated the minds and hearts of the millions of people who read her …show more content…
Though Rachel Carson was not the first to bring up such issues of insecticides - beekeepers and ornithologists had already been filing insecticide related lawsuits in the 1950s - , she was the first to bring it to the attention of the general population, which in my opinion is one of the most important steps an environmentalist can take. It would be unreasonable for Carson to believe that she could singlehandedly stop the use of insecticides and automatically make the world a safe and poison free place, but by bringing such issues to the public eye, she was able to ignite something within the people which would then spread from person to person, state to state, and eventually to government officials who have the power to permanently make a change. Furthermore, though this may not have been her intention, the effects that Silent Spring had on our world and society as a whole expands exponentially farther than the single subject of insecticides. In the book’s introduction, Al Gore eloquently notes that Carson, “brought us back to a fundamental idea lost to an amazing degree in modern civilization : the interconnection of human beings and the natural environment.” And, today, though our world still faces many environmental issues and there are still many who do not believe in the importance or even existence of such issues, the use of such insecticides discussed in
Rachel Carson is a noted biologist who studies biology, a branch of science addressing living organisms, yet she has written a book called Silent Spring to speak about the harmful effects of pesticides on nature. Carson doesn’t write about birds’ genetic and physical makeup, the role of them in the animal food chain, or even how to identify their unbelievable bird songs, yet strongly attests the fight for a well developed environment containing birds, humans, and insects is just and necessary. To Carson, the war for a natural environment is instantly essential for holding on to her true love for the study of biology. Thus Carson claims that whether it be a direct hit towards birds or an indirect hit towards humans and wildlife, farmers need to understand the effects and abandon the usage of pesticides in order to save the environment by appealing to officials, farmers, and Americans in her 1962 book, Silent Spring. She positions her defense by using rhetorical devices such as rhetorical questioning to establish logos, juxtaposing ideas, and using connotative and denotative diction.
In her essay Rachel Carson targets anyone who will listen as her audience. She wants to inform human beings of the effects chemicals have on the environment. Rachel Carson’s audience had little knowledge of the effects radiation and pesticides might have on nature or to themselves. She successfully enlightened her audience to the harm man was causing to the environment not only presently, she also wrote of future ramifications. She predicts “Future historians may well be amazed by our distorted sense of proportion. How could intelligent beings seek to control a few unwanted species by methods that contaminated the entire environment…?” (Carson 615). This statement might make her audience scrutinize their actions through the eyes of future generations.
Rachel Carson is considered one of America's finest science and nature writers. She is best known for her 1962 book, Silent Spring, which is often credited with beginning the environmental movement in the United States. The book focussed on the uncontrolled and often indiscriminate use of pesticides, especially dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (commonly known as DDT), and the irreparable environmental damage caused by these chemicals. The public outcry Carson generated by the book motivated the U.S. Senate to form a committee to
The following involves the second chapter of Carson’s book, Silent Spring that was written in 1962. In this chapter Carson argues persuasively the adverse impacts of pesticides upon the environment and the risks on human health and the environment associated with these “genetic invaders” (Carson, 1962). Many of the extremely diverse people from Carson’s audience targeted were under the impression that chemicals like DDT, at that time in history, were safe for their health. Carson reconciles and attempts to persuade the public to consider the idea that DDT, which in the 1950s and 60s was one of the many chemical pesticides being manufactured and sold to
In the mid-20th century, farmers used a toxic insecticide named parathion in an attempt to control pests detrimental to their crops. Rachel Carson was a biologist who wrote pamphlets (Lear) on conservation and natural resources designed to inform people on the beauty of the living world. In an excerpt from her 1962 work Silent Spring, Carson calls upon the public to take action against the use of parathion by highlighting its catastrophic nature and vilifying the agricultural community for their negligence.
Carson’s other books, Under the Sea Wind, The Sea Around Us (which stayed on the New York Times bestseller list for 86 weeks), and The Edge of The Sea all focus on nature’s strength and the inter-connectedness of nature and all living things. But DDT exposed the vulnerability of nature and I think this influenced the writing of Silent Spring. DDT was the most powerful pesticide in the world at the time of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring. Unlike most pesticides, whose effectiveness is limited to destroying one or two types of insects, DDT was capable of killing hundreds of different kinds at once. Developed in 1939, it first distinguished itself during World War II, clearing South Pacific islands of malaria-causing insects for U.S. troops, while in Europe being used as an effective de-lousing powder. Its inventor was awarded the Nobel Prize.
Everyday people all over the world try to improve the qualities of their lives. Nonetheless, they forget that what they do can have severe harms and damages on the environment and other organisms. In the excerpt “A Fable for Tomorrow” from the book Silent Spring, Rachel Carson describes the disastrous and horrific effects of pesticides on the environment and animals of the town. In the essay “Our Animal Rites” by Anna Quindlen, she shows the inhumanity of animal hunting by human. Furthermore, she argues how human migration is destroying the natural habitats that belong to the animals. In the excerpt “Reading the River” from the autobiographical book Life on Mississippi, Mark Twain describes how he loses the ability to perceive the
In the book Silent Spring, Rachel Carson’s main concern is the widespread use of synthetic pesticides and their impact on the environment. Carson concentrates on a commonly used pesticide in the 1950s called DDT. She opposes the indiscriminate spraying of DDT because it has profound consequences on the environment, humans and animals. Carson collected information about how the DDT can cause cancer in humans, harm animals such as birds and remained in the environment for long periods of time. Subsequently, the chemicals in the pesticides are extremely harmful so she tries to raise awareness and convince others that there are better alternatives.
Rachel Carson was a scientist and author who took a topic which had hitherto been only of interest to fellow scientists and opened it up to the masses. During her lifetime, she took up many causes in support of wildlife and the protection of species and protecting the natural landscape from potential molestation from developers and others who would destroy indigenous habitats. Among her many missions was to make people aware of the hazards of certain chemicals on the environment, such as pesticides on vegetation as examined in her most famous work Silent Spring.
Albert Einstein once said, "Our task must be to free ourselves by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature and its beauty." Similar to Einstein, the author Rachel Carson believed that human kind should embrace nature's and help preserve its beauty and life . In the passage from the book Silent Spring by Rachel Carson, the author informs and persuades her audience against the dangers and misuse of pesticides. Rachel Carson is a renowned writer, ecologist, and scientist who dedicated her life to the conservation of the environment. Throughout her career as an editor in chief, marine biologist, and environmental activist, Carson continued to educate the public about the
This book was focused on the concern of pesticides that industries, along with us as individuals, have been dumping (both knowingly and unknowingly) into water. Carson was concerned that the chemicals which the farmers spread on their fields, and even the chemicals we use in our homes (among others), in the end, might come back around and harm us. The beginning of the book tells a story of a place, that was once so beautiful, turned dead and ugly due to a “strange blight that crept over the area” and destroyed everything. Later in the book, she goes on to explain that chemicals, particularly one known as DDT, are the major cause of environmental damage and the near extinction of
If people were not able to open their own backdoor and see the results Carson was describing, this book would have probably never been what it is today. In the second chapter, she compares the use of these chemicals to nuclear war, which at the time was a threat that people seemed to understand. “People are very worried about the threat of a nuclear war destroying the planet. They should think about the use of these chemicals that are being poured into the environment. These chemicals get into the tissues of plants and animals.” (Carson). This at the time would’ve been a good way to get into the minds of people. Also in this chapter she gets into explaining the history of insects and how they even become a “problem” to people in the United States. This relates well to some of the discussions we had in class about people’s views on the environment.
Some negative effects associated with DDT are nervous system and liver damage, developmental delay, miscarriage and low birth weight, male infertility, the development of and the damages to aquatic life (Panna.org, 2016). Silent Spring by Rachel Carson is praised for its effectiveness in raising awareness about the misuse of pesticides. She made assertions such as “[various birds] are less and less able to produce young and to preserve the continuity of their race” and that DDT is related to breast cancer (Carson, 1972). These are all intimidating facts, thus resulting in an outrage of many countries that eventually led to the banning of its use in those and other countries. The thing that many do not know is that Carson’s statements are misleading in the way that it is phrased
After World War II, the United States’ birthrate skyrocketed, and people found themselves living on the edge of parks and nature. The public began to question whether the government was working to preserve untouched land for future generations. When Rachel Carson published Silent Spring in 1962, the era of environmentalism was born. This movement “demanded the state not only preserve the Earth, but act to regulate and punish those who polluted it” (Farrah). The work on the pesticide poisoning of man sparked a powerful public
In the mid-20th century, farmers used parathion, a toxic insecticide, in an attempt to control pests detrimental to their crops. Rachel Carson was a biologist who wrote pamphlets (Lear) on conservation and natural resources designed to inform people on the beauty of the living world. In an excerpt from her 1962 work Silent Spring, Carson calls upon the public to take action against the use of parathion by highlighting its catastrophic nature and vilifying the agricultural community for their negligence.