preview

The Effective Use Of Pesticides In Rachel Carson's Silent Spring

Decent Essays

In her revolutionary masterpiece, Silent Spring, Rachel Carson brilliantly and elegantly works to inform the public on the risks of carelessly using pesticides and insecticides as a sort of panacea for all pests and annoyances, and works to shed light on the damage that had already been done at the point of the book’s publication in 1962. As discussed in the book’s introduction by Al Gore, at the time of writing, Rachel Carson was enduring intense medical radiation and died, two years after publishing the book, of breast cancer - which has been found to be linked to toxic chemicals possibly coming from insecticides. That being said, Al Gore notes, “ In a sense, Carson was literally writing for her life,” but she was also writing, “against the …show more content…

When compared to Aristotle’s beliefs on persuasion and his three appeals, all three appeals can effortlessly be identified in SIlent Spring. In many of her chapters, Carson begins by appealing to the reader’s emotions (pathos) by either describing the unintended utter extermination of or harm to a well-loved plant or animal - such as the unexpected deaths of household cats in chapter 7 -, then continues to provide unarguable scientific evidence (logos) for such catastrophe - such as the adverse effects of the insecticide Aldrin (to keep up with the cat reference). Then, as if to seal the deal, Carson ends the chapter by posing a sort of ethical question (ethos) such as, “By acquiescing in an act that can cause such suffering to a living creature, who among us is not diminished as a human being?”(end of chapter 7), which not only seems to set the stage for the next chapter, but also leads the reader to reflect on the chapter as a whole and allows him or her to internalize the vast amount of information discussed in the chapter on a more personal and relevant level. Furthermore, though Al Gore notes that these, “emotion-fanning words,” were the basis of much criticism about Carson, it was this emotional level of her writing that captivated the minds and hearts of the millions of people who read her …show more content…

Though Rachel Carson was not the first to bring up such issues of insecticides - beekeepers and ornithologists had already been filing insecticide related lawsuits in the 1950s - , she was the first to bring it to the attention of the general population, which in my opinion is one of the most important steps an environmentalist can take. It would be unreasonable for Carson to believe that she could singlehandedly stop the use of insecticides and automatically make the world a safe and poison free place, but by bringing such issues to the public eye, she was able to ignite something within the people which would then spread from person to person, state to state, and eventually to government officials who have the power to permanently make a change. Furthermore, though this may not have been her intention, the effects that Silent Spring had on our world and society as a whole expands exponentially farther than the single subject of insecticides. In the book’s introduction, Al Gore eloquently notes that Carson, “brought us back to a fundamental idea lost to an amazing degree in modern civilization : the interconnection of human beings and the natural environment.” And, today, though our world still faces many environmental issues and there are still many who do not believe in the importance or even existence of such issues, the use of such insecticides discussed in

Get Access