The Effects Of Standardized Cognitive Tests On Student Emotional Health And Personality Essay

Most standardized test do not measure emotional or mechanical intelligence, actually a lot of educators argue that standardized test do not measure comprehension or actual intelligence but rather memorization. While others may believe that standardized testing just needs a few improvements, others believe that it is impossible to have a test that measures accurately the capability of a diverse student population. Today’s schooling depends heavily on the test scores from standardized test. Standardized testing should not have so much weight put on them because they have a negative impact on effective education, students’ self-concept, and learning styles.

Tyler Gamache is an 7 year, 4 month old male enrolled in the first grade at Loudonville Christian School. Tyler Gamache was referred for a comprehensive psychoeducational evaluation to address concerns regarding his performance in the classroom. Tyler is currently receiving speech and language services, as well as remedial reading support, but continues to have academic difficulty in first grade. To assess Tyler’s cognitive abilities, academic skills, and social-emotional functioning, norm referenced testing was conducted.

Assessment of this kind identifies strengths and weaknesses, and provides detailed diagnostic information about how students are thinking. The collection of evidence of this

Valid – The test must be shown to measure what it is intended to measure. Unbiased – The test should not place students at a disadvantage because of gender, ethnicity, language, or disability.” Yet, all three requirements for a test to be viable do not apply to standardized testing. Results produced are not consistent, as the day to day lives of students are constantly changing; Issues in the students’ lives may affect their thoughts, emotions, and health that would affect the results of their tests, providing a variety of test scores for one person alone. The validity of the test is also in question as it does not account for differences in students’ backgrounds and personal life so test scores do not accurately measure student’s abilities, but rather, it measures their ability to memorize information and test taking skills. Standardized testing holds a very large amount of bias, as the students of different ethnicities, cultures, and languages, have to confront many biased questions that are present in standardized tests. Therefore, standardized testing, according to Zucker’s analysis of an effective test, should not be used as an effective measure for testing students’ intelligence as it breaks the three requirements that make

Thesis: Standardized tests such as the ACT and SAT are not the most accurate way to measure a students aptitude and intelligence, therefore schools should pay more attention to graduation and dropout rates, enrollment into advanced placement classes, as well as extracurricular activities.

Gianna Schillinger is an 8 year, 9 month old third grade student at Forts Ferry Elementary School. Gianna was referred by her teacher and the Pupil Service Team (PST) for a psycho-educational evaluation due to difficulties in the learning and retaining of concepts across her core subject areas despite receiving a high level of academic intervention services throughout her school years. To assess Gianna’s cognitive abilities, academic skills, and social/emotional functioning, norm-referenced testing was conducted.

In the society of today, there are various educators who believe in assessment as proper method to measure the performance of a child in school as well as the overall achievement of a specific school system. The assessment may be presented in the form of verbal, written, or multiple choice, and it usually pertains to certain academic subjects in the school curriculum. Recently, many educators began to issue standardized tests to measure the intelligence of a common student body. (Rudner, 1989) These standardized tests were initially created to reveal the success in institutional school programs, and exhibit the abilities of students today. The standardized tests can reveal the strengths and weaknesses

Rosenthal and Jacobson visited an elementary school and gave IQ tests to the students. They randomly selected 20% of the students in the school and labeled these students as having especially high potential for success. At the end of the year, the students were retested. The students who had been labeled as bright had scored significantly better than their peers. Teachers also rated these students with more positive characteristics than other students. The teachers’ high expectations for these students may have meant that they exposed these children to different material, expected more of them, and taught them differently. The children also probably changed their behavior in response to what was expected of them. This allowed, positive expectations

Standardized testing is used in schools across the nation to determine academic placement, disability status, grade promotion, and high school graduation. Would an alternative to standardized testing for high school students provide a more authentic assessment of ability and academic achievement? There are several weaknesses with relation to standardized testing and in comparison, authentic assessment requires a more hands on approach to teaching. There are also several reasons why teachers are not jumping on the bandwagon of more authentic assessments. Professionals in the field of psychology, who work with children, should have a broad knowledge base in education and authentic assessments. Distinguished and credible sources aide in the

To protect that student’s identity, this student will be referred to as Montrel. Montrel is a 13 year-old 7th grade student that has been diagnosed with ADD/ADHD. Montrel’s disability was confirmed based off of the BASC (Behavior Assessment System for Children) being completed on him by his general education teachers and his parents. Additionally, Montrel’s was given an IQ test to measure his academic abilities as well. He showed some discrepancies in both math and english that could have classified him as having a specific learning disability in those academic areas;However, his ADD/ADHD ruling trumps these classifications and show to be the major cause of his discrepancies in the areas of math and english. Assessment team reports were additionally completed to assist in finding Montrel’s weaknesses and strengths academically. The following data sources were additionally used to determine Montrel’s current level of performance: career clusters inventory, observations, and classroom teacher reports.

The personality assessment inventory tests provide results on my individual personality, values, motivation, decision making, communication, team skills, conflict skills, organizational structure preference, and stress. These results are broken down briefly in three parts and do not include any personal speculation or analysis as to their meaning. The application of these results are further applied and explains how the results noted from the tests and in the first step will make me a better employee, co-worker, and manager within my organization. These tests mentioned above are applied in conjunction with particular examples on how I can achieve becoming a better employee, co-worker, and manager. An explanation of how my personality and experiences were affected by the Holy Spirit is also discussed. Particularly, how potential weaknesses have become strengths with the guidance of the Lord.

Companies have started to use personality tests in the past five years so that they can find a potential employee’s strengths and weaknesses. If questions and answers are quite accurate and test is done properly it can help an employer to find more about person’s advantages and disadvantages. It is very important to know because one of the most important points is that most of personality tests help to recognize unqualified candidates. “Although experts warn that many personality assessments don't deliver what they promise, legitimate scientifically validated tests are helping employers evaluate job candidates to select those best suited for particular positions. Other tests are designed to measure intelligence, honesty, management aptitude and other qualities.”

Psychological tests and or psychological assessments are an important asset in the field of psychology. These tests are designed to measure people’s characteristics which pertain to behavior. There are a variety of different types of tests that can be used to assess different types of behaviors. According to the specific behavior or behaviors being assessed, tests are categorized into two types, ability tests and personality tests. Ability tests, which encompass achievement, aptitude, and intelligence testing are used to determine capacity or potential by measuring scores based on speed, accuracy, or both. On the other hand, personality tests, which include structured or projective are used to determine behavior traits, that may be overt

Psychology, Educational, and other fields used standardized testing to measure skill, thought, accomplishment, behavior, and psychopathology for many years. The authors Cronbach and Meehl’s developed“Construct Validity in Psychology Tests”, which they display the study. The journal discusses the contemporary theory back in the mid-20th century. The traditional operation of validity check on a number of idea associated with the validity constant which being usually stand for r. This ratio described the size of the relationship between that of the test score and an outcome measure. In contrary to model method has got its remarkable advantage to the traditional method to the fact that the model theorizes validity. For example, the stage in process to which sources can be shown to participate in a foreseeable set of psychological means. During assessment with those methods affected as a deductive by the description of the instruments used and the setting in which the testing takes places(Rossner et al., 1994).