Is it possible for a presidential candidate to receive the most popular votes and still not be elected president? Many Americans are shocked to discover that the answer to this question is yes. The Founding Fathers were not the strong advocates of democratic rule that the average American has been led to believe. For proof of this one needs to look no further than Article II of the United States Constitution. In Article II one will find the details of the Electoral College system, a system which denies the power to elect the president to the American people. (The Constitution) The Electoral College is an outmoded system which denies the American people the right to elect their president democratically and should be abolished and …show more content…
A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations. It was also peculiarly desirable to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder. This evil was not least to be dreaded in the election of a magistrate, who was to have so important an agency in the administration of the government as the President of the United States. But the precautions which have been so happily concerted in the system under consideration, promise an effectual security against this mischief. (Why Was the Electoral College Created)
One can determine quite clearly from these words that the Electoral College system was designed to be anti-democratic. The issue of how to best divide power between the large states and small states played an important role in the development of the Electoral College. Traditional wisdom teaches that the
Founders created the Electoral College as part of the compromise to win the support of the small states that feared that the large states would have too
The Electoral College is an excuse of the electoral process, proving itself to be undemocratic, false in representation, and harmful to third-parties. Although the Electoral College may keep the peace between states and their representatives, the Electoral College makes it so that the winner of the presidential election is not what the nation truly
Beginning in America in 1787, the Electoral College was originally created during the Constitutional Convention to help make a fair way for the president to be elected without giving too much power to either the national government or individual states. Over the years, the Electoral College has undergone a few changes in attempt to make it more fair, but there is still much debate about whether or not the Electoral College is the most effective way to elect a president. Some people believe that the Electoral College does an excellent job of creating an equal distribution of votes across all ethnicities and social classes of America. In contrast, others think that the Electoral College does not give an accurate portrayal of the popular
The Electoral College gained its origins when our countries fore fathers gathered at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and began brainstorming on different methods to elect a President. The Electoral College at the time was created to be a
It was created to allow all citizens to participate in elections directly while also giving smaller states some leverage and weight in the presidential elections. The electoral college also allowed constituents a chance to participate directly in the election for chief executive by voting for the electors, or people selected by citizens to cast electoral votes in the presidential elections. It also allowed for the smaller, less populated states to have more pull in the presidential election than they would if the president was simply elected by popular vote.
The voting process in America appears straightforward, but it is a very complex, complicated system. The Electoral College is America’s current voting system. The Electoral College still serves its intended purpose, but with increasing political activity among Americans it has caused a need to reform this process. Research suggests that the Electoral College system should be amended because it poorly illustrates democracy, is outdated and the majority of Americans are in favor of abolishing the system.
In my honest opinion, I think the electoral college should be done away with. People may disagree, but here’s my argument. When voting for a president, someone who is going to have a majority of the power in his/her hands, yes some people may think irrationally. But the founding fathers weren’t thinking about the future per say. They were only trying to make sure that for the next couple of years voting would be fair. Were they really thinking 100 years ahead? If we were to do away with the electoral college, we would’ve had a different president today. Instead of making our nation happy, we try to mask the fact that we’re being unfair, while trying to be fair. When a majority of people vote for one candidate, and the other candidate wins, people get upset. We didn’t want to give power to high-populated states, The two main political parties can count on winning the electoral
The Electoral College was established, by the Constitution to elect the President, in order to avoid an unfair balance of powers. The framers chose the complicated system of the Electoral College as the most equitable option. One option to elect the President was to hold a popular vote, however, the framers argued that the people might not have enough wisdom or information. The State Legislators were a promising option, but the framers worried that the Legislators would carry too much bias against national interest. The last option was Congress, but the framers knew allocating the powers to Congress would cause it to be too powerful thus becoming unbalanced. The Electoral College system allows for equal influence for both the people and
many Americans still have a misunderstanding of the process of the electoral system and its flaws. Striking defects include smaller states having an advantage over larger states and there being a basis of a winner takes all system. The United States should not have an Electoral College, but It would be exceptionally difficult to completely eradicate the electoral system, considering it would require a constitutional amendment ratified by 3/4 of the states. However, we should work to at least modify it.
You walk into the voting booth on the first Tuesday of November to cast your vote for who you think should be President. You take your ballot into the box believing, as most people do, that your vote will be counted along with the rest of the population. You do this because you believe it could be the deciding vote for the presidential race. Well, you are horribly mistaken. What you may not realize is that the Electoral College actually elects the President, not the individual voters. The Electoral College is an outdated, flawed institution that does not reflect the majority of the country’s opinion, and, therefore, it should be abolished and replaced by a direct election, or at the very
The Electoral College system is not the best election system for America because it allows the candidate with a minority of the popular vote to win the presidency. People who vote don’t count directly in the Presidential
The electoral college is the mechanism established by the United States constitution for the indirect election of the president of the United States and Vice president. The electoral college was created was created because the founding fathers were afraid a tyrant could manipulate the system. Because a state's electoral votes are equal to its representatives plus its two senators, and every state has two senators, the electoral college gives excessive weight to states with small populations.
As the Founding Fathers of the United States gathered their insightful concepts on how to best create a new nation, the Electoral College system arose. Since the birth of America’s Constitution, it has stayed in place. Yet, some question its validity and fairness. I personally believe that the Electoral College, although created for a perfectly justified and valid reason, is no longer concurrent with what the Founders intended it to be, and its use should be discontinued.
America, land of the free and where every vote matters, but does it? The popular vote in america hasn't always mattered and may never matter when the electoral college holds the final poll for presidency. bush was one president who didn't have the popular vote at all, yet he still became president. Does the popular vote matter and should we fix this issue? In reality americans votes don't matter because the electoral college has final say in the presidential election.
The abolishment of the electoral college has been a highly debated political topic since it was first established by our founding fathers. The Electoral College is a voting system that was put in place by the founding fathers back in 1787. When voters casts their ballots, they are actually voting for the presidential electors. Each state is guaranteed at least 3 electoral votes. The number of electors a state has is equivalent to the number of representatives they have plus the 2 seats in Senate.In total there are 538 electoral votes; including the 3 from D.C. electors. However the Presidential candidates need at least 270 votes to win the election. However, this electoral system has created quite an uproar among people since the last election. The electoral college has limited democracy to people in three major ways: by having the ability to alter results of the election over the popular vote, discriminating candidates to campaign in certain states, and subsidize the decline in voter turnout.
The Electoral college contributes to the election of the President of the United States. This system requires states to elect a number of representatives to cast their votes in the presidential election. This system allows smaller states to have a bigger impact on the presidential election. In most other countries and even the individual states a popular vote is what decides who will win the election. Many citizens have debated about whether we should keep the Electoral College or resort to a popular vote.