The Failure of the Schlieffen Plan and Its Effects on the German Defeat on the Western Front

individual war plans which stated how they would rise above their enemies and claim victory. Unfortunately for some, not all of these plans were created equally. Unlike the other powers of Europe, Germany had created only one plan known as the Schlieffen Plan. The Schlieffen Plan had been created to be used as the perfect tool to winning a war, unfortunately the plan had been born from the arrogance of Alfred von Schlieffen and later altered by Helmuth von Moltke. Due to how the Schlieffen Plan was both

Analyse the reasons for the defeat of Germany in the First World War The 3rd of March 1918 was a fateful day for both Germany and Russia as the Treaty of Brest- Litovsky was signed. This treaty confirmed the end of the eastern front and Russia's defeat. Therefore, Grmany was no longer fighting a war on two fronts and hence, they were able to transport several units to the western front war with France as reinforcements. As a result of this, a concentrated offensive on France was able to be launched

on the Western front’ two questions are actually being asked. Firstly, why did a stalemate start and secondly why did the stalemate continue between 1914 and 1918. The second issue within the question is the section that specifically refers to stalemate between ‘German and France’. It is debatable whether this refers to conflict between German and French armies or German and French territories. Since British and Belgian forces had a significant impact to conflict on the Western

consider this question. By asking ‘Why was there stalemate on the Western front' two questions are actually being asked. Firstly, why did a stalemate start and secondly why did the stalemate continue between 1914 and 1918. The second issue within the question is the section that specifically refers to stalemate between ‘German and France'. It is debatable whether this refers to conflict between German and French armies or German and French territories. Since British and Belgian forces had a significant

Support or refute the argument that the prolonged and bloody stalemate of World War I stemmed from a slavish adherence to the theories proposed by Clausewitz Major Marc C. Jeter H100: Rise of the Western Way of War 10 June 2015 The stalemate of World War I’s Western Front resulted from a situation where leaders experienced and educated in 19th Century tactics and strategy could not reconcile this “predisposition” with the changes to war brought on by technological advances and not due

termination of the so-called “Сoncert of Europe”, which destruction had begun with the Franco-Prussian war. As far as the French needed revenge and the Germany sought for colonies, the active military actions were inevitable, and, due to the French and German diplomacy, the scope of warfare was unprecedented. Both parties had a stake on a short-termed war, thus, they made military reforms and preparations to fit the character of the actions. Before the First World War, Europe stood at the height of its

brutality, and by the number of people it reached. The roots were not only buried in the First World War, but also in the precious years after it. It was also the result of Axis aggression, a failed peace treaty after the First World War, and the failure of the Allies to stop the expansion and influence of Axis powers. When the First World War started, many people believed that it would be a quick war (Wilkinson 35). To many who looked the combatants, the Entente powers

staff had helped plan the crime). World Response Initial world opinion also believed Serbia was behind the assassination, and the initial

have always created, destroyed or enveloped nations, states or empires. Examples of these include the Final War of the Roman Republic, which culminated with the Battle of Actium in 31 BCE, to the Franco-Prussian War of 1871 which created a unified German state. However, World War One is known to have had the greatest impact on human civilization. It dragged in almost every continent into the conflict, halted global trade, led to the demolition of four empires, and gave nationalism everywhere a boost

For Germany, 1914 would witness the enthronement of Kultur in Europe and the fulfillment of Germany’s historic mission. As Thomas Mann saw it, “Germans . . . deserved to be the most powerful, to dominate, to establish a ‘German peace’” (311). The French, for their part, in the face of growing German militarism given voice by the Kaiser himself, “possessor of the least inhibited tongue in Europe,” stoked up their furor Gallicae and awaited the moment that had seemed inevitable