Yevgeny Bazarov, the main character in Ivan Turgenev’s novel, Fathers and Sons is fascinatingly complex—full of passion and contradictions. Rude and unsympathetic to everyone, including his loving parents, members of his own generation nonetheless respect him greatly for his ideals and intellectual acumen. The generational conflict that is the basis for the novel is most exemplified by Bazarov’s confrontations with Pavel Petrovich, his friend Arkady’s uncle. When viewed as social criticism of these two conflicting ideologies, Turgenev comes out neither entirely on one side nor the other, but somewhere in the middle, critiquing both sides’ extremism. Although in terms of age and social class Turgenev belongs with Pavel and Nikolay, his …show more content…
If interpreted as the latter, which is in fact correct, it reflects favorably on him (probably more so for the modern reader than one of Turgenev’s contemporaries).
Bazarov’s relationship with and treatment of peasants is essential to understanding him and appreciating the good in him. Although he is not a member of the nobility, like the Kirsanovs, or wealthy like the Odintsovas, he is well educated, and a member of their social circles. However, he never discriminates against anyone on the basis of their class. Indeed, during Bazarov’s stay at Marino, he is more favorably thought of by his hosts’ servants than his hosts themselves: “The servants too had become attached to him though he teased them: they still felt he was one of them and not a ‘master’”(44). Even though the romanticization of peasants as the most authentically “Russian” people was popular at the time, and that belief is one that members of Pavel’s old aristocracy subscribe to (Pavel goes so far as to offer up the Peasant Commune as the one thing, above all else, that should be immune to Bazarov’s criticism) Bazarov is the only character who interacts with serfs exactly as he does with the nobility.
The other great conflicts in Fathers and Sons are internal ones. Bazarov, who considers “romanticism” the greatest of all vices, struggles with his love for Anna Sergeyevna, trying to repress and ignore it until he can no longer. He declares his love for her when they are alone in her bedroom: “‘So
However, these masks are not strong enough to justify his true nature which is much illustrated by the way he got married. The author reports that Gurov got married in his second year of university studies, an act that portrayed Gurov as not fully focused in his studies but rather concerned by fulfilling his sexual lust. Thus his desire to marry was not driven by the will to raise a family as entrenched in the society’s social standards (Sleeper 75). The author’s description of the beauty in Gurov’s wife even before they got married counters all the negative pictures that the character is painting to the audience. Whereas the husband talks of her to be unintelligent, the author describes her as a dignified woman who is feared by her own husband.
And his professional duties and the whole arrangement of his life and of his family, and all his social and official interests, might all have been false” (Tolstoy 32). Here, the third person omniscient indicates that what Ivan has been living his whole life to satisfy society and live according to society was a false thing to do. Tolstoy, the author, illustrates that Ivan has finally realized the truth. He has been living an artificial life, marked by shallow relationships, self-interest, and materialism. It is insular, unfulfilling, and ultimately incapable of providing answers to the important questions in life.
Father and Son by Bernard McLaverty 'Father and Son' by Bernard McLaverty is a short story which is set in
Aleksandar Nikitenko was among one of the serfs who served in Russia during the early 1800s. He was born from Ukraininan parents in Voronezh Province. His parents, soon along with Aleksandar, were serfs of the immensely wealthy Sheremetev family. Nikitenko’s father was chosen at a very early age to go to Moscow to sing in Count Sheremetev’s choir. While there, he received an education that allowed him to pursue intellectual interests. Nikitenko looked up to his father and believed that having to be kept in bondage despite his knowledge was entirely unfair. Throughout his life, Nikitenko is accepted by intelligent teachers for being quite knowledgeable. However, he is time and time again held inferior because of his social status. His family, had it not been for serfdom, would have probably been a part of a provincial middle class because of their associations with nobles and merchants.
The absence of a fatherly figure in each Wes’s life is significant for different reasons but coherently shapes their futures. Joy’s husband was a role model for Wes, he supported his family and taught Wes how to act like a respectable man. Unfortunately, he died due to illness. Mary on the other hand had the job of raising Wes on her own because Wes’s father was not present. Wes only had his brother Tony to look up to, Tony had followed a path of crime and uncertainty. Although in Tony’s best effort he tried to steer Wes down another path so he did not follow in his footsteps, however, Wes chose to live a life of crime. In Mary’s defense she was blinded by her motherly intuition and made excuses for Wes and believed his word in times of doubt.
In the novel, The Chrysalids by John Wyndham there is a strong conflict between David and his father that leads them to total estrangement. First, David believes that being different is not a crime and that mutants should be protected. And second, David’s father believes in strict loyalty to the “norm”. First, David and his father disagree in their belief in the image of God. When Aunt Harriet came to David’s house she tells her sister about her newborn child’s deviation and asks if they could switch babies until the baby gets inspected.
After reading each of the sample essays I decided that I was going to write about the ones I connected to. Brian Musser "My Father's Son", Kelley Pheng "Small Asain Women", and Michelle Andreetta "Life with Marvin" are the essays that I can relate to.
Dmitri Dmitritch Gurov is a middle-aged banker living in Moscow with his wife and three children. He is “…unfaithful [to his wife] often..”, a serial adulterer who speaks ill of women and refers to them as the “lower race”, yet cannot “…get on for two days without [them].” Gurov believes he can keep on with his affairs with no ramifications because after meeting he has, it simply “…slip[s] out of his memory…” and he goes back to his family, until he feels the urge to cheat again. Since his philosophy has always proven to be true, he thought his time in Yalta would be like his other “experiences”. This is when he meets Anna Sergeyevna.
The Ivanov’s were a young, successful couple living in Brooklyn, and commuting to their jobs in Manhattan. They had it all, wealth, good looks, charm, and generosity. The husband, Stefan, worked on Wall Street while the wife, Alexandra, worked at a marketing firm a couple blocks away. They had everything but a child, as they had been unable to conceive despite trying for 6 years. Stefan’s great grandfather emigrated from Russia in the early 20th century, so Stefan and Alexandra decided to look to Russia for a child to adopt. They worked through a local Russian Orthodox Church to facilitate the adoption, which told them that they had the perfect child in mind. An eight year old boy named Nikolai, with
Dysfunction within an individual can be the result of various occurrences, whether it is a traumatic experience that has stemmed into a life of self-doubt and vulnerability, or it is a series of unfortunate events that has led the individual to believe that life is simply an ongoing controversy. However, dysfunction within a family is much more than self-afflicted stress, it is rooted within the familial bonds that gradually break as a result of conflict, co-dependent adults, perhaps substance abuse, and oftentimes a struggle of conformity brought on by an external source. In the novels Revolutionary Road and Anna Karenina, Richard Yates and Leo Tolstoy depict familial dysfunction that can occur as a result of society’s overwhelming
Father and son relationships are the most important type of relationship. Fathers heavily influence their children especially sons, thus making the relevant. In the book Things Fall Apart there are two father son relationships, Unoka and Okonkwo and Okonkwo and Nwoye. These relationships are not ideal and each father has a different relation with their son. These relationships cause many things such as loathing of one's father, and rebelling. Rebelling for the sons is not a phase, but a lifetime of rebellion. Father son relationships in the book Things Fall Apart are defined by the loathing of one’s father, causing a rebellion leading the sons to be complete opposites of their father.
The period is the early 19th century; those involved and discussed in this essay are for the most part Russian gentry. Increasingly relaxed social mores in the “developed” world, including the greater freedom to choose to whom one gets married to as well as increased women’s sexual rights, were much more uncommon during the time that War and Peace takes place. Tolstoy, an outspoken critic of arranged marriages, uses the characters in his novel as a way of exploring the various types of love, and in general the interactions between men and women of the time. This essay will attempt to focus on these relationships in an effort to get a better idea of Tolstoy’s views on the proper roles that men and women should play as friends, lovers, or
Imperial Russian society during the time of serfdom was characterized by constantly changing social order. The society experienced a complex social change at the threshold to emancipation. It was undergoing many changes with increasing westernization and serfdom culture that gave rise to formation of new classes (raznochintsy) during the nineteenth century. Many authors have reflected and emphasized this component of change in the structure of pre-emancipation Russian society. This paper will examine how two writers: Nikolai Gogol and Ivan Turgenev, in their novels, Dead Souls and Fathers and Sons depict the society’s constantly changing nature through the relationships between their characters and the development in their beliefs and ideas. Although both the novels explore societal change during the pre-emancipation of serfs, the emphasis of change is different in both the novels. In Fathers and Sons, Turgenev oversees shifting values prevalent in the society. He explores the shift in generational values by depicting the difference in beliefs of characters like Bazarov and Nikolai. On the other hand, in Dead Souls Gogol focuses on issues of morality in society. He depicts a struggle for morality and portrays a corrupt society through the landowners and the protagonist, Chichikov, in his book.
We will begin with an analysation of his family situation. Praskovya, his wife, had been a love constructed from the start of an economic and sociological expectation rather than that of a true courtship. The happiness therefore of the union was derived solely of a necessity to fulfill a desire on the part of others for a “success” of sorts, surely her desire as well. “Ivan Ilyich could have counted on a more illustrious match, but even this one was quite good. He had his salary, and her income, he hoped, would bring in an equal amount. (Tolstoy, 56)” Tolstoy goes on to make several remarks on the benevolent nature of the relationship between he and his wife. The arrival of his children creates no great marker in his life, and proves to be little more than a factor in his ever-lengthening retreat into his life of solitude and work.
This commentary will focus on perhaps the most interesting and complex character in Fathers and Sons: Bazarov.