The Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) issued Statement 45 (GASB 45), in June 2004, this statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for post-employment benefits other than pensions “other post-employment benefits (OPEB)” offered by state and local governments. Requiring local governments to actuarially determine their annual required contribution (ARC) to fund OPEB and to account for the unfunded amount as a liability on annual financial statements. Government employers required to comply with GASB 45 include all states, towns, education boards, public schools and all other government entities that offer OPEB and report under GASB. In this paper we will have an overview of this pronouncement and see how it will …show more content…
GASB believes that the “pay-as-you-go” method does not accurately reflect the accurate costs that governments are accumulating for future benefits of current employees. Because this method fails to recognize the cost of benefits in periods when the employer receives the related services, it also doesn’t provide certain information about the actuarial accrued liabilities for promised benefits associated with past services and whether and to what extent those benefits have been funded, and it doesn’t provide useful information to assess potential demands on the employer’s future cash flows.
From an accrual accounting perspective, the cost of OPEB, like the cost of pension benefits, generally should be associated with the periods in which the exchange occurs, rather than with the periods when benefits are paid or provided (usually many years later). When implementing GASB 45, many governments will report annual OPEB costs and the unfunded actuarial accrued liabilities (UAAL) for past service costs. Disclosure of this information will foster improved accountability and better informed policy decisions about the level and types of benefits provided by employers and potential methods of financing and managing those benefits.
The implementation of GASB 45 has been staggered in three phases, the first phase was for large governments with annual revenues of over $100 million, these governments were required to make the change from a pay-as-you-go accounting basis for OPEB
New accounting rules will affect the company’s revenue recognition in the upcoming year. Many companies such as Rolls-Royce Holdings will be affected by this change. Rolls-Royce Holdings books its revenues even before its services performed. For instance, they sell large engines and maintenance service, and Rolls-Royce Holdings booked the revenue even 1.5 years in advance. They will no longer able to book this unperformed revenues for the upcoming year. The investors will have a better picture on the firm’s revenues based on the new revenue recognition. Some sectors, such as telecommunications, media and pharmaceuticals, are expected to be affected more than others, because the firms recognize revenues before they perform the services. Moreover,
According to the fact of this case, Parent Co. (Parent) wholly owns Poor Son Co. (Poor Son) as a legal subsidiary, and both of them all nonpublic companies. However, in January 2007 Poor Son filed a voluntary bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. bankruptcy code because of its inability of meet obligations as they became due. Then, Parent claimed the loss of control of Poor Son and deconsolidated Poor Son from its financial statement. Through the bidding process in May 2009, Poor Son and OtherCo, the winning sponsor, filed a joint plan of reorganization to the bankruptcy court, but the plan was rescinded by OtherCo later due to significant market value shrink of Poor Son. After that, the
Operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision-maker to assess performance and make resource allocation decisions.
It also allows the business to keep a track of money going in and out of the business. There are two main categories that all the elements fall into:
Under IFRS, companies may elect to account for actuarial gains/losses in a manner such that the gains/losses are permanently excluded from the primary statement of operations. Differing restrictions over how assets are valued for the purposes of determining expected returns on plan assets exist under IFRS. IFRS allows for the separation of certain components of net pension costs whereas US GAAP and Mexican FRS do not. The interest cost and return on assets components of pension cost may be reported as part of financing costs within the statement of operations under IFRS as opposed to operating income under US GAAP and Mexican FRS.
Companies can cover employees’ expenses in two ways: through an “accountable plan” or a “non-accountable plan.”
Accordingly, the $39.3 million actuarial gain which resulted from the restructuring is included in Accrued Pension Costs in the accompanying Balance Sheet and is being amortized to income over a ten-year period commencing in 1984. The effect of the changes in the investment return assumption rates for all U.S. plans, together with the 1984 restructuring of the U.S. Salaried Employees' Plan, was to reduce pension expense by approximately $4.0 million in 1984 and $2.0 million in 1983, and the actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits by approximately $60.0 million in 1984. Pension expense in 1983 was also reduced $2.1 million from the lower level of active employees. Other actuarial gains, including higher than anticipated investment results, more than offset the additional pension costs resulting from plan changes and interest charges on balance sheet accruals in 1984 and 1983.
The last several decades have been a turbulent period for management accounting in the United States. Many U.S. businesses failed in the international market, and the management accounting profession recognized that some of the blame rests upon shortcomings in the information provided to managers. A continuous flow of articles dating back to the mid-1980's such as Kaplan (1986) or Chalos and Bader (1986) has criticized contemporary management accounting systems. On the other hand, Reider and Saunders (1988) offered a defense of contemporary management accounting methods asserting that the methods are adequate but have not been used appropriately.
ORL adapts a flexible business model depending on changes of the market. In general, ORL’s strategy is to provide worldwide luxury brands and it focuses on channel of distribution, extension of Asian market and licensed brand.
Pratt Company owns 80% of Storey Company’s common stock. During 2008, Storey sold $400,000 of merchandise to Pratt. At December 31, 2008, one-third of the merchandise remained in Pratt’s inventory. In 2008, gross profit percentages were 25% for Pratt and 30% for Storey. The amount of unrealized intercompany profit that should be eliminated in the consolidated statements is
Roles are different for management and Management accountant. Same person could do both, but the roles will completely differ. Thus, Management accountants support all the decisions made by the managers. They can mix up their roles that they have daily across the departments and multiple functions. In addition, it includes working for branches of companies that are located in other countries and preparing non-financial and financial work. Achieving an organisations strategic goals are vital, all the decisions made by management accountants has a huge impact to help them achieve their goal. Management accountant used to only provide, process and collect information during the year 1950.
Management in business and human organization activity, in simple terms means the act of getting people together to accomplish desired goals. Management comprises planning, organizing, ->resourcing, leading or directing, and controlling an organization (a group of one or more people or entities) or effort for the purpose of accomplishing a goal. Resourcing encompasses the deployment and manipulation of human resources, financial resources, technological resources, and natural resources.
Many alternative methods exist for implementing financial management systems, and the organization should choose methods appropriate for its particular scale of operations. If the grantee organization is unable to meet the standards that are covered here, NEA funding may be terminated and the organization may be deemed ineligible to receive subsequent financial assistance or may be placed on an alternative method of funding. Recipients must have accounting structures that provide accurate and complete information about all financial transactions related to each Federally-supported project. Grant expenditure records must be at least as detailed as the cost categories indicated in the approved budget (including indirect costs that are charged to the project). Actual expenditures are to be compared with budgeted amounts. Accounting records are to be maintained on a current basis and balanced monthly. Costs may be incurred only during the grant
Property rights in long-term assets are generally acquired through purchases funded by either internal resources or funds borrowed form external sources. Nevertheless, a time line of the business and accounting issues are associated with the purchase of long-term assets. And these accounting issues include, in addition to the difficult financial decision, the valuation of the original acquisition cost, determining the amount of expense or periodic write-off, treatment of subsequent expenditures, and recording the disposal of the assets (Stice & Stice, 2014) , and have led to leasing as an alternative means to acquire long-term assets to be used by firms.
Over the years, with the corporate development and social or statutes pressure, some concepts and standards related with audit is uncertainly or ambiguous. The obvious question is whether auditors should be blame when they failing to warn investors to ailing firms’ financial problems and risks (McNabb, 2009). In my opinion, auditors should be blame when they did not provide sufficient and useful information to alert to investors.