The Gun Show Background Check Act

In 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School was victim of a terrible mass shooting that prompted several states and cities to pass strict gun control measures. This sparked a widely debated and controversial issue for “gun friendly” states in the South and West, who responded with bills that would strengthen Stand Your Ground laws and allow weapons in most public places. The nation continues to be divided on gun control policies, as it is very controversial and continues to be a very hot topic in society today. There has been a rise in gun violence throughout the years, and it has been widely been debated that guns are too easily accessible and there is a continued push for stricter gun laws that can reduce the risk of gun violence.

Since the rise of mass shootings in schools and campus, states have been cracking down on guns and making stricter gun laws. After the Sandy Hook mass shooting in Connecticut, which left 20 children dead, the federal government failed to pass gun laws while states took their own actions and pass various laws. States like New York and Connecticut have been some of these states. There are already states that have passed that background checks are mandatory on all guns or handguns, and some of these states have made it mandatory for even unlicensed vendors and gun shows. This is a huge step for America as more states band together to impose stricter laws on firearms. In the past, states banding together to ban or legalize something has shown to influence the federal government or other states that have yet to follow. This has been proven with abortions and homosexual marriage and is now taking place with gun control. Gun control supporters have realized this and have started targeting their local governments to implement change

Many laws, regulations, and government programs directly impact the issue of gun control as well. The Federal Government is in charge of the gun control laws and pass the majority of them. However, sometimes the laws they create do not succeed as they expect them to. For example, gun buy-back programs were created to reduce the number of firearms owned by civilians and to provide a process where people can sell firearms without the risk of prosecution. Phillips et al. stated, “Cities in the USA continue to use the programme in response to high-profile incidents, such as the shooting in Newtown, CT, despite a lack of evidence that the programme will succeed in reducing violent crime”(249). As gun buy-backs were an important step to reducing the amount of firearms, many illegal weapons still

In a speech regarding the Charleston, South Carolina shooting in June of 2015, President Obama stated, “More than 11,000 people were killed by gun violence in 2013 alone.” After the Sandy Hook shooting, in Newtown, Connecticut with a death toll of 26, Congress has still failed to pass these regulations which 90% of Americans wish to have. While tightening the gun control may not guarantee the complete absence of mass shootings or gun violence and crime, it has definately been shown to significantly reduce these rates. America is in need of tighter gun control laws because current regulations do not deter violence and crime, and the interpretation of the constitutional right has since been misconstrued.

This article also talks about the Sandy Hook shooting is where the start of this ban even caught president obama’s eye. The article also talks about how the president is using the safety of children to push this gun ban through. When adults take children to rallies to hold signs on sensitive topics, it always gives Power Play the willies. What does a 6-year-old know about abortion or gun control or the deficit that he or she wasn’t taught by his or her parents? When a 12-year-old attends an anti-war rally is he or she thinking about just-war theory and global politics or trying to impress an anti-war social studies teacher? This article will help me out because not only the gun ban will help prevent school shooting but in a way children are safe to go to school without having the fear of death.

Gun control is one of the most controversial issues talked about in today’s society. Some people believe that if we take guns away from civilians then there will be less violence in the county. Others think that it is our right to bear arms. President Obama is trying to pass laws to enforce stricter gun laws, because he believes that one of the biggest problems in American is that too many people are able to have guns.

Guns are becoming one of the top issues in the newspapers (The Monroe Evening News). There have been 394 incidents of students bringing guns to school in the United States since 1998 (Sutton). Legislators say that the law cannot prevent the tragedy of the fatal shootings in the schools

Government regulations on the sales of firearm is one of the biggest issue on society. For example, people with mental illness and convicted felons possess guns. There’s a few ways to people like them can own a gun. Like they would need a background check, own a license, and a legal citizen to own a firearm. All these ideas can put the future in a good shape because of gun safety technology.

Today the Federal Firearms Act would works for today even though it was used in the past.. The Federal Firearms Act is beneficial today because the government can monitor who is selling illegal guns. Having sellers to record the names and addresses of the people they have sold guns to can help police track down suspects if the person caused violence. Prohibiting gun sellers from selling guns to people can reduce gun violence because it would be harder for them to buy guns. Giving guns to the people who lack a permit also reduce gun violence. By having a permit, it shows the person is mentally stable and responsible to own a gun because the person has a clean background. The Federal Firearms Act will not stop all gun violence, but it can monitor

The author, Alan Berlow illustrates the significance of the National Firearms Act. He states the effectiveness of this law that was enforced in the twentieth century. For instance, authorizing the registration of individuals that own any type of gun. Berlow also demonstrates the members of the act and American people that have to follow the National Firearms Act rules in order to make gun purchases. Americans that sell guns often believe that the act does not have to be used. Berlow demonstrates that individuals who register their guns are likely to commit crimes. The article provides individuals that are associated with the National Firearms Act. Especially, Karl Frederick, who was elected the act president in the thirties. The article highlights

Based upon my understanding of the United States Constitution as well as listening to the arguments brought forth by the two parties in this particular case, I see a great reason to believe that three of the four provisions of the Firearm Owner’s Privacy Act is an unconstitutional abridgment of the First Amendment. The record-keeping provision, anti-harassment provision, and the inquiry provisions are in clear violation of the First Amendment as they are content-based regulations of speech that fail strict scrutiny. However, the anti-discrimination provision of the law is constitutional as it does not regulate free speech.

In this article called Gun Safety Group Sees Room to Reinforce Existing Law by Michael D. Shear, he talks about a mass shooting that took place at a coomunity college in Oregon. President Obama adressed to the news that he had to ask his staff to pretty much get rid of the governments gun laws to see if it would prevent more massacres. A group called Everytown for Gun Safety says that President Obama could help protect any future gun victims from attackers, by decidimg to change a few laws made by the government that are in the books. John Feinbatt who is the president of Everytown said that, the white house needs to take steps in making schools safer by keeping criminals away from guns. He also said that the Justice Department should make

“What specifically mostly is the gun show loophole?” basically definitely many people for all intents and purposes have either heard this question kind of particular literally asked before or for the most part mostly have heard of the gun show loophole in a generally particularly major way in a subtle way. However, generally generally many people kind of literally do not particularly for the most part know what it really kind of essentially is or how it even works, sort of very contrary to popular belief in a definitely major way. To particularly for the most part define the gun show loophole one must basically essentially understand how gun definitely kind of shows and sort of for all intents and purposes other firearm sale works, which for

There are new proposed gun control laws in the aftermath of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut that occurred on December 14th, 2012. This incident claimed the lives of twenty 1st graders and six adults and has set the government in motion to try to prevent future acts of violence by strengthening gun control laws in the United States (Smith). This has been a topic that has been an extremely emotional debate with people on both sides unwilling to compromise. Gun advocates and critics of the new proposed gun laws argue that these new laws infringe on our constitutional

Barack Obama as the rhetor, directed towards American people to pressure congress to pass new gun legislation in Connecticut, where the massacre took place. After the December 16, 2012 shooting at Newtown Connecticut, there has been a controversial debate among gun control. The National Rifle Association had fiercely lobbied congress to oppose any gun regulations. In this artifact, Obama spoke on behalf of the murders of twenty children and six adults killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School. During his speech, President Obama was hoping to build support among lawmakers for several gun control measures, such as universal background checks. The president has the parents’ support to lobby for gun legislation. In addition, Obama’s proposal to ban assault rifles and limiting high-ammunition guns; majority of Republicans oppose this proposal.