ASSIGNMENT
LEAD THE CHALLENGE IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRUB MODEL
Introduction
THE RATIONALE
The most important learning outcome perceived from this course so far is that accurate process development and professional leadership is at the center of the dynamic of project management practice.
This analysis bases itself on examples taken from an organization that has a well structured and clear defined program and project management process. Despite being well structured well but has its bits of bureaucracy, can be very complicated to understand and extremely difficult to be followed.
In the context it had been conceived and implemented, i.e., to manage the IT Projects that for the majority are developed in-house, most of the time it
…show more content…
THE ANALYSIS
There is a clear consensus among the parts affected by it that there is a need to change, but for some reason they find themselves caught in a sort of "Social Conformity" as explained by Solomon Asch in his "Studies of independence and conformity" (Asch, 1956). The purpose of his study was to try to explain the reasons why a person change behaviour and sometimes beliefs so that he can fit in with a group. In his experiments he demonstrated that only 25% of people never conformed with others.
In some cases, from a brief and informal conversation with some senior executives it comes out that because of the success of some projects that are considered benchmarks and become case studies for many renowned experts, the process must be good. Even when the evidences prove, it wrong they keep defending it, regardless. It is easy to conclude that because some projects are very successful when managed by a standardized process it will fit all and will always produce the same results.
However, investigating the reasons why no one has the initiative to promote these changes could be the topic for a completely different research.
Instead, the purpose of this research 's exercise is to try to identify a few reasons why the IT Division of such a big and successful organisation, keep putting efforts and resources into managing programs that lead to the development of projects that are, in some cases, prematurely
In order for an organization to remain successful, it must be able to fulfill its day-to-day operations without mistakes. If these demands cannot be met, a new project must be created in order to stay in business and ahead of the competition. If an organization has a problem, they can benefit from fixing it by following a formal process for identifying, selecting, initiating, and planning projects (Valacich, 2009).
The paper is divided into three sections, the first of which will establish a timeline of events. This project background will serve as a case study for the analysis in the following section that will be structured such that each of the previously mentioned facets will be independently analyzed and contrasted with project management principles. Finally the paper will conclude with a summary of the analysis and recommendations based on
As a result, the IS people weren’t a particularly happy lot...no one really had a great deal of respect for them.” (Brown & Vessey, 2001) This shows that business users were disconnected with their IT development counterparts and most often blamed IT for not doing enough to fix problems with the applications. They failed to realize that the problems they were seeing with their systems was due to the business users requesting a lot of adhoc changes to be made to the system without engaging proper change management
In the case study, “Project management Helps the Department of Defense protect Military and Civilians from Hazardous Materials”, the Department of Defense (DOD) had similar problems as the company in the article. The DOD had project to create a web-based software system that monitors, collects and analyzes information regarding human exposure to hazardous materials. The DOD also had scheduling problems. Teams for this government sponsored project had a difficult time coordinating their schedules with other government initiatives. Besides scheduling problems, there were disagreements on the minimum system requirements. And of course the schedule challenges led to budget issues
Project management provides a strong foundation for developing the attributes needed to pursue high-level leadership roles, analytical positions, and many other areas within the business environment.
2. The management difficulty covers alot of the project lifecycle except maintence. IT implementations are pose to different special challenges because there frequently are involved with new and
This is a very important risk in Information Systems Projects. The project structure clearly outlines the outputs and the processes of the whole project. It also seeks to explain the command power and source, and the decision-making approach. If the project structure is not well explained and understood, the requirements of the project will not be meant since it will not be easy to make strategic decisions and how the work should flow and who should be involved. In the case of FoxMeyer, the project had collapsed due to poor planning, user involvement and lack of restructuring of the internal work systems to accommodate the project (Portny 38). Highly structured projects helps individual teams and supervisors to understand their responsibilities. These makes staff more focused on their requirements. This risk could, therefore, be avoided if a comprehensive and formal project structure is created. In so doing, it becomes easier to integrate the responsibilities of each team towards a common goal and
In the case study, “Project management Helps the Department of Defense protect Military and Civilians from Hazardous Materials”, the Department of Defense (DOD) had similar problems as the company in the article. The DOD had a project to create a web-based software system that monitors, collects and analyzes information regarding human exposure to hazardous materials. The DOD also had scheduling problems. Teams from this government sponsored project had a difficult time coordinating their schedules with other government initiatives. Besides scheduling problems, there were disagreements on the minimum system requirements. And of course the schedule challenges led to budget issues, especially when the project
AteckPC faced some obstacles and challenges while implementing PMO. There was a lack of existence of formal project management (PM) in the organization. AteckPC’s management recognized the need for formal PM. However, moving from non-formal PM to formal PM created many cultural barriers. Many of the staff including managers perceived project management as something that will get in the way of doing their job. Therefore, there was resistance to change coming out of the employees. Some were having a lack of experience with formal PM, and others were missing the knowledge in how to deal with some software tools. Also, there were some employees who found the flexibility and informality appealing. Even the IT staff preferred the informality since
Since R.Ryan Nelson’s conclusions (2007) are based on the persuasive research report and many typical case of IT projects that have great bad side-effects or loss, his suggestions convinced me a lot. I will following R.Ryan Nelson ‘suggestions (2007) in the following ways:
In this paper, the author will introduce a failure case of K-Mart 's IT modernization system project. In 2001, K-mart took $1.4 billion dollars into this project with the purpose of competing with its rival Walmart. The dream is beautiful, but the real work is cruel. After 18 months, the project was failed because of lacking of cash. What happened in the detailed for this project? $1.4 billion dollar is huge numbers, why it was still not enough to pay and distribute for this project? How did its project manager do in this project? What are the project problems? How can we learn from the failure of this case? The paper includes the case background introduction, the project development process, the problems in the project, analysis and
As according to the AtekPC Project Management Office case, the purpose1 of a PMO is to fulfill the need for greater discipline in managing IT projects. Moreover, it establishes or enhances project management skills, process, and governance structures within an organization (Applegate Pg. 462). The director of Application Development, Richard Steinberg, described AtekPC’s PMO’s purpose as a “methodology” for managing projects with standardized practices. As stated within the case, the main purpose of the PMO is to provide standardization in managing projects of large, complex scales as well as gain improvements in planning and performance of initiatives (Applegate Pg. 465). The case generalizes
Project management involves carefully organized and planned efforts channeled towards the accomplishment of a particular task. Projects encompass activities such as implementing new computer systems or constructing a new office. Projects require careful monitoring from the start to the completion. One person mandated to take charge of projects is a project manager. Project managers experience complications from project management. The challenges arise from the dynamic environment in which the managers function (Barker & Cole 2014). Project management dynamic environment consist of day-to-day operations, user community, geographically disbursed members, outsourced staff, and internally employed personnel. The dynamic environment compels a
Prior to this course, I thought that in order to manage a project you need to be a project manager. However, this course changed my perspective on project management. As I continue to read the book, I realized that I actually manage many projects, and project management is not only limited to organizations. Throughout our lives, we manage many projects from planning a wedding to building a house, some of those projects may take few days and some may take years to complete. In addition, I also learned that there are no two projects that are alike, each project has it’s own unique elements that set it apart from other projects.
Every Successful Business depends upon Project and Program Management. The Program Management is the discipline of managing of interdependent groups of project and it is a great challenging and complex process of coordinating several related product development projects, often with the intention of improving the performance of a company or an organization. Mostly, those are governed by a contract between the companies or enterprises. For Program success good governance is very critical element in any program management. Program management includes value management, asset management, Risk Management, Trend analysis and Human Capital management. The major responsibility of Program Management is to own and oversee the program implementation underlying IT and business strategies and moreover, the responsibility includes the allocation, the utilization and the last but not least Direction that can be assigned to the people of the best three levels in the program management hierarchy.