The Importance Of Autocratic And Transformational Leadership Styles

Andrew Carnegie was one of the wealthiest men in America but his wealth didn’t come without hard work and dedication. Carnegie was born in “Dunfermline, Scotland on November 25, 1835” (Tyle). According to Laura B. Tyle, the invention of the weaving machine unfortunately pushed Carnegie’s family in to poverty “In 1848, Carnegie’s family left Scotland and moved to Allegheny City, Pennsylvania, where his father and eventually him worked in a cotton factory” (Tyle). After leaving the cotton factory “Carnegie became a messenger boy for the Pittsburgh telegraph office and eventually made his way up to telegraph operator” (Tyle). According to Laura B. Tyle “Thomas A. Scott, the superintendent of the western division of the Pennsylvania Railroad, made Carnegie his secretary at the age of eighteen.” Later, Carnegie took over Scott’s position of the railroad. Furthermore Carnegie “began to see that steel was going to replace iron and by 1873 he organized a steel rail company” (Tyle). According to Laura B. Tyle he continued to build his company when he “cut prices, drove out competitors,

Andrew Carnegie, the “King of Steel”, the benevolent employer, the giant of industry, was among the greatest influences of the second industrial revolution. It is sometimes questioned whether Carnegie was the ruthless, sneaky steel tyrant some made him out to be, or the generous, benevolent education benefactor he appeared to be. I believe him to be a combination of both, but more so the great giant of industry.

As young immigrant child living in the rural ruins Andrew Carnegie was forced to not receive education and held accountable for his family´s well being. One of his early jobs was a telegrapher this job gave him the experience that led him to becoming Thomas Scott´s protégé in the railroad business. By this, Carnegie obtained many knowledge from the desiscions Scott made, which eventually help Carnegie create the sensational Steel Industry. Although, Carnegie´s story is one of the most admired through-out this era, however in his early life things weren’t effortless. The responsibility taken by him during his childhood was colossal having to work everyday to sustain a single mother raised family is not a piece of cake. Similiarly,the average life a coal miner entails how poor children had to appear at the coal mine everyday risking their life each second spent in the fuming mines, and all for a couple of cents a day. This caused a an enormous impact on Carnegie´s perspective over wealth, he believed if people wanted to overcome

     True, Andrew Carnegie and John D Rockefeller may have been the most influential businessmen of the 19th century, but was the way they conducted business proper? To fully answer this question, we must look at the following: First understand how Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller changed the market of their industries. Second, look at the similarities and differences in how both men achieved domination. Third and lastly, Look at how both men treated their workers and customers in order achieve the most possible profit for their company.

Perhaps the most controversial of Andrew Carnegie’s qualities is his belief in Social Darwinism. The English philosopher Herbert Spencer convinced Carnegie that it wasn’t bad to be successful. It was “survival of the fittest” in the business world and there was no reason for Andrew Carnegie to feel guilty for obtaining more wealth. Throughout Carnegie’s life, he displayed his firm belief in the certainty of competition. In fact, he was afraid of competition and did all he could to obstruct or completely remove it when it came to his

Near the last decades of the 19th century, America’s industrial economy skyrocketed. As these industrial leaders like Carnegie and Rockefeller not only lead the expansion through their respective industries, but revolutionized businesses while crushing free-market competition in the process. As

The “rags to riches” story is a term of reverence respecting the few in society who sacrificed the little they had and emerged successful. These doctors, lawyers, entrepreneurs, researchers, and other professionals inspire people of all socioeconomic levels by transforming nothing into something. Jay-Z, George Soros, Steve Jobs – these are names culture holds with great respect. One “rags to riches” story not many Americans have heard of pushes the limits of mental capacity. This man followed the poor-to-rich path and succeeded to such high degree that he, in turn, defined the very essence of this characteristic. Once a poor boy, Andrew Carnegie transformed the limited resources available to him into tools that aided his journey in becoming one of the richest, most successful men in all of history. Carnegie began his journey as an immigrant to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania from Scotland. His family sought work, as their former weaving business had been destroyed by the Industrial Revolution (“Andrew Carnegie” American Experience). This experience as a poor worker created the drive that led him to become one of the wealthiest men of all time through his massive steel company, the Carnegie Steel Company. In conjunction with his economic success, the tycoon used the fruits of his leadership in the steel industry to become the “father of American philanthropy” (“Meet Andrew Carnegie”). As accomplished the man became, the

Andrew Carnegie was believed by many to have stolen his immense fortune by underpaying workers while others believed he worked his way to get where he was, and deserved every last penny he received. Controversial figures like the one described caused a copious amount of issues while many tried to decide whether they believed these industrialists were robber barons or captains of industry during the Gilded Age of the late 19th century. The Gilded Age was an important time is United States history that witnessed many concerning issues such as corruption, unemployment, and poverty. Because of the expansion westward and rapid pace of industrialization, many believed the United States had reached a “new golden age.” Relating to the term Gilded, the United States was looked upon as an unbelievably successful area, but had underlying elitists manipulating how the United States was viewed. The wealthy industrialists of the late 19th century were social darwinists involved in many unnecessary actions such as putting their employees in poor working conditions, underpaying their workers, and supporting children and women in the labor force.

Andrew Carnegie Essay written by aliciareagan@neo.tamu.edu A man of Scotland, a distinguished citizen of the United States, and a philanthropist devoted to the betterment of the world around him, Andrew Carnegie became famous at the turn of the twentieth century and became a real life rags to riches story. Born in Dunfermline, Scotland, on November 25, 1835, Andrew Carnegie entered the world in poverty. The son of a hand weaver, Carnegie received his only formal education during the short time between his birth and his move to the United States. When steam machinery for weaving came into use, Carnegie's father sold his looms and household goods, sailing to America with his wife and two sons. At this time, Andrew was twelve, and his

One of the pioneers of the Big Business I chose to research is Andrew Carnegie. In this paper I will include how was his business and how did Mr. Carnegie started his business. I will also talk about how his business grew to the level it did. The good and bad effects of the business in the 19th century, How Mr. Carnegie business affected society today, what were the pros and cons of this business, if this cons and pros still exist.

The nineteenth century was a time of progress for the United States, a time when a free-enterprise economy ruled the industrial sector. It was also the time when one of the greatest entrepreneurs achieved dominance, Andrew Carnegie. A captain of industry, Carnegie built and ran his a steel company in Pennsylvania. The free enterprise system was both necessary and conducive to Andrew Carnegie's success. It gave him freedom to make his own economic decisions, such as where to work and how to treat workers.

Andrew Carnegie is known for being a Captain of Industry who served their country greatly. Carnegie got this title since he ended up one of the richest men on the planet. One motivation behind why Carnegie is viewed as a Captain of Industry is on the grounds that he helped deliver steel in a more proficient manner. Another motivation behind why Carnegie is a Captain of Industry is on account of without him we would not have libraries that are interested in each race, culture, and religion. Carnegie is likewise viewed as a Captain of Industry in light of the fact that despite the fact that he gave all his cash away at last, Carnegie was considered as one of the most powerful person in the United States. Despite the fact that Carnegie is known for being a Captain of Industry, he is also known for being a Robber Baron. Carnegie is a viewed as a Robber Baron since he had his specialists work in his factories which have poor and dangerous working conditions. Carnegie is additionally a Robber Baron in the fact that as he succeeded and moved toward becoming the most richest men in the world. The last thing behind why Carnegie is a Robber Baron is because of when his specialists got up from working for essentially no compensation and went on strike which he chose to have one of his head representatives stop the strike to get Carnegie laborers to work for him once more. To finish up Carnegie changed the world with his innovation of steel and he changed history due to his great innovations and

Leadership styles have significant effects on organizations. For instance, it influences organizational culture and determines how leaders address conflict. Ultimately, it impacts organizational performance. Consequently, leaders must adapt their approach to achieve the desired outcome. Therefore, it is imperative leaders understand and can implement a variety of leadership styles. This essay will describe how an autocratic and participative leader’s style impacts organizational culture, summarize the strengths and weaknesses of each style, and explain how each leader would successfully resolve conflict.

Over the course of several decades, the depiction of leadership has changed. What was thought to be innovative and participative or transformational tactic to leadership has replaced the classical and autocratic or authoritarian approach. The step forward that not everything old is bad and not everything new is good was made somewhere along the way. It was determined that different leadership styles suited different situations, and it is the responsibility of each leader to figure out when to make use of an individual leadership approach or style. The two leaders selected for this assignment are Martha Stewart representing an authoritarian leadership style and William Shatner’s television character, James Tiberius Kirk from the starship Enterprise representing a transformational leadership style.

Autocratic leadership is a classical leadership style with the following characteristics: manager seeks to make as many decisions as possible, manager seeks to have the most authority and control in decision making, manager seeks to retain responsibility rather than utilise complete delegation , consultation with other colleagues in minimal and decision making becomes a solitary process managers are less concerned with investing their own leadership development, and prefer to simply work on the task at hand. Whereas Democratic Leadership is the leadership style that promotes the sharing of responsibility, the exercise of delegation and continual consultation. The style has the following characteristics: manager seeks consultation on all