Electrical Transmission Lines The British Columbia Assessment Authority (BCA) is reviewing the cost model upon which electrical transmission lines are annually assessed. This cost model has not been reviewed since 1999. The intent of the review is to ensure rates meet the requirements of Section 21 of the Assessment Act and BC Regulation 217-86. Some clean energy producers with significant transmission lines were ask by BCA to submit data on the cost of their transmission lines which they have done. BCA has collected data from BC Hydro and Fortis, and have also had a consulting report prepared as well. Potential changes are a concern for our members because unlike all other linear property owners such as rail, fiber cable, pipeline, …show more content…
Much of what the public knew about small hydro facilities was based on media coverage noting incidences of fish kills. One environmental group stated that “run-of-river hydro projects are killing fish - and the problem is not isolated.” In response, in 2014, CEBC partnered with the Pacific Salmon Foundation (PSF) to conduct an independent review of small hydro projects. The study prepared by ESSA Technologies Ltd. had a Public Advisory Panel comprised of academics, First Nations, industry, and NGOs. The report found that although there are risks to salmonids through water intakes, ramping, and habitat changes, the loss of individual fish and/or individual events are not having significant effects on salmonid populations. Of 23 small hydro facilities that were examined, there were only changes in abundance or species compositions at 2 facilities. This study resulted in an ongoing dialogue with the public, environmental groups, and industry. It generated media that corrected some of the misconceptions about small hydro projects. On January 14, 2014, PSF CEO Brian Riddell told the CBC that while some older sites lacked monitoring, “at this point in time, the information we have would say the harm [to salmon] is minimal.” CEBC was able to get the message out that small hydro projects are safe and our industry is held to the highest standard possible. Innergex recently submitted 5 year
“When AES undertook primarily domestic contract generation projects where the risk of changes to input and output prices was minimal, a project finance framework was employed.”
Dams are harming salmon in so many ways. They’re taking away their habitat. The salmon’s access of the rivers are suddenly gone. In the Northwest, a large portion of dollars are spent in a year to fix all the damage to the salmon, caused by the dams on the Snake and Columbia rivers. For decades, there have been numerous debates about taking down these dams to help the fish, because they’re part of the endangered species act. There are biologists that notice how some salmon are trying to survive in rivers located in the Northwest that have been changed by dams. These fish are simply delaying migration back to the sea, growing larger in order to survive their trip back to the Pacific Ocean, and going back to their birth streams at higher rates than ever. All these salmon could be saving themselves instead of people spending billions of dollars. The consequences of this could be very important. The recovery of salmon
Not only are the Native Americans against the dam for these reasons, other people relied on the salmon populations for both sport and food. With the denial of access to their spawning grounds, the salmon populations would begin to dwindle until extinction. If the salmon populations plummet, the populations of species lower on the food chain would rise and the ecosystem would become off balance. Salmon is much more than just a key portion of their diet, salmon holds a higher power than just for
All of Penticton’s residential and commercial electricity needs are provided by BC Hydro – a provincially owned resource. Each residence is charged for their electricity use based on their consumption and monthly usage. The city is part of the energy awareness campaign and does encourage residents to make power smart
The Impact of Hydropower Dams on California's Populations of Anadromous Fish: What can be done to mitigate the Dams Effects and Restore California's Watersheds.
Dams have arguably put the largest strain on the Chinook salmon. In Columbia River Basin of the Pacific Northwest alone, over 55% of historical spawning habitat has been blocked off by dams (Harrison, 2008) Damn also cause rivers to slow down which in turn causes them to become warmer. This makes for a less ideal habitat for the salmon, and more ideal circumstances for the predators of the salmon. The slowing of a river can also be cause for disease( U.S.F.W.S). Also only about 1% of present
The economy is, or was, expected to grow, along with the salmon population and recreation. The observers, McEwen and Weintraub, studied the plan for restoration and the river before the plan, made presumptions with the information given to them. The San Joaquin’s restoration plan, as expected, contained more consequences than lifesavers. In the end, dams, since they are made by humans, are a disruption to wildlife, just as humans
In 2007, Canada’s industries saved 2.1 billion U.S. dollars of energy costs (2007). All these numbers show Canada’s efforts in general public utilities.
The thirst for water has lead individuals and organizations to build dams across rivers at an alarming rate. During the early 1900s dams were being built so fast it was no longer big news when a dam was completed. These structures provided controlled irrigation water and hydroelectric power to the communities not only close to the reservoirs and dams, but also provided irrigation water and hydroelectric power to communities many miles away from the river. Negatively blocking the flow of the river has impacted fish ecosystems, increased evaporation of water, and flooded intricately important landscapes. These negative impacts, it can be argued, affect the humans living downstream or within the flood plain of the dam site. Dams
The first Pacific salmon hatchery was constructed on the McCloud river in California in 1872, and its purpose was to produce Chinook salmon eggs that would be distributed far and wide, starting a practice of introducing non-native fish for human enjoyment and consumption that has proven very destructive, both to populations of salmon and other fish species (Maynard and Trial 2013). During this time the main goal of hatcheries was to produce as many salmon as possible, regardless of the carrying-capacity of the effected stream, a practice that was largely motivated by the canning industries who benefitted significantly from increased salmon production. During this period, the natural environments that shaped the development of each salmon run were not only seen as unimportant, but actually detrimental to salmon-production (Maynard and Trial 2013). Current research makes it clear that these factors, which early hatchery managers saw as detrimental, are in fact key to healthy salmon
Staff writer Vashti Harris in the Suburban editorial “Local residents learn how pipeline would affect Raitan Bay“(July 19, 2017) agrees with local residents that the Williams Transco Pipeline will only cause annoyance to local residents and threaten lives of animals. The noise of the drills needed to build this pipeline will disrupt many residents of New Jersey, and once it is built, it will disrupt the rivers recreational value, and both kill and disturb species such as dolphins, whales, and fish-- all for a pipeline that, according to ReThink Energy NJ, will only bring gas to New York. The purpose of his writing is to inform New Jersey residents about
While proponents for not building the pipeline cite past unfortunate events as evidence for their argument, there are many facts that lead to the dismissal of these claims as unrelated or simply irrelevant. A widely used example is the Deepwater Horizon spill, or the BP oil spill, in April of 2010. This spill was highly covered by American media, engraving in the public mind that waters surrounding oil refineries and lines often become damaged or contaminated. This is shown by the opposition’s contention that the original route crossed the Sandhills in Nebraska. The Sandhills are considered wetlands by state and federal governments and are home to a large portion of the Ogallala Aquifer, “the single most important source of water in the High Plains region, providing nearly all the water for residential, industrial, and agricultural use” (Ogallala Aquifer). Comparing the consequences of the Deepwater Horizon incident to pessimistic thoughts of the Keystone XL, advocates of the project’s cancellation claim that if the pipeline were to break or leak at point along the route near the aquifer, it would pollute the area’s usable water, therefore causing significant environmental and economic damage. Rebuttals for this argument are very resolute; pipeline supporters and other experts assert that this should not be as big of an issue as it is advertised to be. James Goeke, professor emeritus at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and a hydrologist by trade in
But overfishing - combined with a loss of habitat and the construction of dams in tributaries, which prevented spawning – has nearly exterminated the species, leading non-profit and government agencies to coordinate programs in hopes of restoring the numbers.
Provision 2 requires a survey of facilities along Elk River and that the findings be made publicly available. This provision would help to build a backbone of information needed to quickly and effectively respond to future incidents. The survey could identify chemicals stored in the watershed and gather toxicity data on these chemicals. The survey could also ascertain tank characteristics, tank maintenance and their proximity to fragile ecosystems, as well as provide up-to-date facility contact information. Taking it a step further, this data could be used to determine which facilities pose the greatest risk and establish emergency preparedness plans for those facilities.
The purpose of this project is going to see if hydropower is more efficient than wind power. This project would change the way environmentally generated power is produced. The project tests hydropower and wind power, to see which