The Media Has Much Influence On Our Everyday Lives Essay

The social media and the public might want police body cam footage release but sometimes it might be to graphic or controversial. Police body cameras have been a topic since the incident with Michael Brown in august of 2014. Police shot and killed an unarmed individual in ferguson, MO, leading to many people wanting cameras on police. Whether the cameras are a good idea or not this paper will explore the facts and sides of police body cameras. Overall body cameras should be required Because they can save the lives of the innocent, keep innocent people from going to jail, and can help a case as more evidence.

On the evening of February 26, 2012, in Sanford, Florida, a neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman fatally shot unarmed 17-year-old teenager named Trayvon Martin. Some say Zimmerman acted rightfully in self-defense while others believe he acted wrongfully by racially profiling Martin during the incident. Similarly, on August 9, 2015, an 18-year-old teenager named Michael Brown was fatally shot to death by police officer, Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri. Some witnesses believe that Brown was unarmed during this unfortunate incident and that he was holding his hands up in order to surrender to Wilson. Unfortunately, society may never know what actually happened since witnesses, proof, and evidence were very limited during that time of the events. Incidents like these may never have to happen again if law enforcement wore body cameras during their shifts. Body-worn cameras are a video recorder mainly used by police and law enforcement to record interactions with the public, evidence at crime scenes while still improving officer and citizen accountability. Due to the recent rise in news following innocent people being unjustly shot by law enforcement, the idea of wearing body cameras are starting to look like a great idea. Body worn cameras seem like a great asset to utilize for every police officer out there however there are some faults to it as well like some security, ethical, and social issues.

Samuel Ibisi; I think police officers all over the world should wear body camera's because the beginning of this article it show a image of three people and those three people were label number one was a witness , number 2 was the suspects and finally number 3 is the police officer. And all three of the people who was label all said the same thing which was I'm telling the truth but we know that one of them must be telling and this is one of the reason why should have body camera's to have prove of which is telling the lie or the truth. August 2014 it was a killing in Ferguson,Missouri of a young black , But other people in the who saw the killing was in shocked because the young black teen had his hands up and didn't do anything but the cop

August 9th, 2014 is a day that will live on in infamy in the United States and the law enforcement community. On this day in Ferguson, Missouri, a member of the Ferguson Police Department, Officer Daren Wilson, shot and killed Michael Brown. From all accounts of the investigation at this time, Michael Brown was unarmed and had been stopped by Officer Wilson due to walking in the middle of the street (jaywalking). What happened next is in dispute and shocked the conscious of America. While investigators are still trying to answer the question as to what caused this tragic event to take place and evidence is being presented to a grand jury; a secondary discussion has emerged. Should all law enforcement agencies be required to purchase body-worn cameras for their officers to wear? Are body-worn cameras a good idea or will this help to create an Orwellian environment? Will body-worn cameras increase transparency for the law enforcement community or will it create a greater divide?

The use of body worn cameras for law enforcement officers has been a growing demand for the public, especially after a recent case in the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. This case has sparked an increasing concern of police brutality and use of force.

Are we influenced by the media, if yes how much? Sociologist and Psychologist contemplate that question often. The media has been accused of causing violent behavior, negative racial stereotyping and negative body perceptions mostly among young girls. No one can deny that the media has an effect on society, but is the media just giving society what he or she wants? Has the media taken away our ability to think for ourselves critically? We are constantly feed information from the newspapers, television news and weekly news magazines most of us believing without question because we believe the source credible.

Hollywood controls most entertainment media consumed by people all around the world. The messages and images portrayed in movies and television shows created by the large production companies affect all those who partake of the media they produce. Entertainment media can be uplifting and enjoyable, however, media normalizes damaging gender norms for men and women.

The controversy surrounded by the use of body cameras is a growing cause that has taken over the United States in recent years. Civilians, to police officers, even the President of the United States are calling for police officers to be held accountable for their actions. The first option chosen is body cameras. While some would say, body cameras are an invasion of privacy. Cameras should be worn to show the public the human side of an officer and provide evidence when no witnesses are available. As well as show the human side of police officers. In the following paragraphs, I will show you that body cameras are very useful and they should be worn by all law enforcement officers while on duty.

“Body cameras help to record what happens. It may not be the golden ticket, the golden egg, the end-all-fix-all, but it helps to paint a picture of what happens during a police stop,” says Clementa C. Pinckney, a member of the South Carolina Senate. The idea of police officers wearing body-cameras has caused a lot of debates on whether or not body-worn cameras are effective or just a waste of time. The use of body-worn cameras has been increasing through the years, but not everyone has been in favor of it. Some people say that body-cameras are effective in reducing police corruption such as force against citizens and there are others who say that body-cameras are useless and go against privacy rights. Police brutality has been one of the top discussions in the United States that have shifted a lot of people’s attention to body-cameras. A lot of police departments have been implementing body-worn cameras and believe it has improved the way police stops are handled. The purpose of body cameras is to have a visual record on file that can later be watched and be used as evidence. With body-worn cameras, police misconduct can be validated when and if police officers keep their camera on during their shift. Despite negative views on body-worn cameras, there are some people who support the use of body-worn cameras and believe that body-worn cameras can help our society by reducing police corruption. Although there are some drawbacks to body-worn cameras, there are

Jim Morrison, an american song writer, singer and poet, once said, “Whoever controls the media, controls the mind”. The Media have becoming one of the most dominant source of education of the 21st century. We could argue that most americans use the media as their main source of information. The side effect on that is the fact that the media is very polarized. With the ongoing polarization, we could hypothesize that people would have been more politically educated and oriented if the media was not infiltrated.

media, when you wake up, one of the first things you will do, and I

The world is changing every day and technology advances by the hour. After the people of this country and especially those from the Ferguson area in Missouri, protested with incredible feelings and emotions towards the killing of Michael Brown on August 9th, 2014, President Barack Obama announced the Body-Worn Camera Partnership Program. The general goal of this is to promote accountability and transparency in police-civilian interactions. Obama announced a $263 million plan to provide body cameras, training, and more for 50,000 police officers throughout the country. This is one of the first steps the federal government has taken to directly address the widespread problem of police brutality in this country. (Source 1) We are now entering the era of body cameras within law enforcement in our communities. Although this proposal has gained a lot of popularity since 2014, it has been more complicated than most people realize. There are so many issues revolving around body cameras and the incidents that still occur only makes this conversation even more difficult. One of the main issues is the actual footage of the videos. We would all like to believe that seeing video footage of a controversial incident like an officer involved in a shooting would tell the whole story about what happened and that it would be easy to indict an officer who acted unjustly. Unfortunately, that’s almost never the case. People never see the entirety of an incident, only the part where the situation

Amid those days I understood precisely what an essential part that media plays in my regular daily existence. From the noteworthy to the insignificant, media massive affects practically every part of my life.

Jim Morrison, an American song writer, singer and poet, once said, “Whoever controls the media, controls the mind”. The Media have become one of the most dominant source of education of the 21st century. We could argue that most Americans use the media as their main source of information. The side effect of that is the fact that the media are very polarized. With the ongoing polarization, we could hypothesize that people would have been more politically educated and oriented if the media was not infiltrated.

In 2014, the shooting of the unarmed teen Michael Brown has woke the nation to discuss about excessive force used from the police and police brutality. According to statistics two out of three Americans has mentioned that the police officers does not give fair treatment and also not used the right amount of force towards the citizen. This has brought the attention to the discussion of should police should wear body cameras. I believe that police officers should be required to wear body cameras because it could decrease police brutality by 66 percent. This could also help clear up case/provide evidence towards the accusation using the body cam footage and also it could civilian complaints.