Akbar Research Paper

Do you believe that Master Fard Muhammad is Allah in person? While Other religions say that God is not a man, so Master Fard Muhammad cannot be Allah in person, the Nation of Islam believes that Master Fard Muhammad is Allah in person. I do believe that Master Fard Muhammad is Allah in person, and most people doubt it and ask what evidence do we have to prove that, but despite what other people say I do believe that there is reasonable evidence to prove that because He had gained 10,000 followers alone in Black Bottom, Detroit, He took a man named Elijah Poole, who only had a third grade education, and taught him for three years, a knowledge that was so powerful, and He came to North America by himself to raise his father's people.

Babur expanded his kingdom by attacking Afghanistan and conquering Kabul after 21 years of being in power. From that point, he crossed over the mountains into Hindustan and attacked the Dehli Sultanate, again defeating them and gaining their land. When he died in 1530 he had conquered all of Hindustan and controlled an empire that stretched out from the Deccan to Turkestan. These different strategies of conquering land helped the 2 empires rule throughout Asia and, in the Ottoman’s case, some parts of Europe also.

At that time, Mughal Empire was still strong compare to British settlers. British decided to trade with Mughal Empire, and swallowed it step by

Throughout time empires have risen and fallen and taken various approaches in doing so. Some of these society were warlike, while others focused on intellectual discovery. Among these various societies were great empires like the Ottoman, the Mughal, the Spanish, and the Ming. All four of these great empire ruled at overlapping times but all eventually fell for different reasons. All had strengths and weakness and can be used as a learning opportunity for an empire that came after them. From the Ming and the Ottoman you can learn strength such as religious tolerance and government structure. On the other hand, the Mughal and the Spanish teach us the dangers of over taxing and over centralizing government. In order for an empire to successfully function they must have an accepting culture, a balanced economy, and manageable size.

People, places, and/or things come and go, changing from one thing to another or none at all. In other cases, it is just not people, places, and/or things, it can also be generations or empires. Empires are known to adopt similar traditions or beliefs from other empires. In addition, some empires have similar, but slightly different laws and/or goals. Two of the empires that were similar, but different is many ways are the Ottoman and Mughal Empires.

The Mughal Empire ruled most of India and Pakistan in the 16th and 17th centuries. The empire Islam in South Asia, and caused the spread of Muslim arts and culture as well as faith. The Mughals were Muslims who ruled a country with a large

The Mughal Empire: Zahir al-Din, also known as Babur, was a Chagatai Turk that, unlike the Ottoman and Safavids, was just a soldier of fortune not fighting on behalf of Islam. He wanted to use his fortune to transform a glorious central Asian empire. Although, he did not succeed at that goal he then focused on India. Babur took Delhi in 1526. He did not like the land that he had conquered, it was a hot and humid climate but, Babur decided to stay. By the time of his death he had embraced most of the Indian subcontinent. The height of the Mughal power and influence came from Babur’s grandson Akbar. He gained power in Gujarat and Bengal, destroyed the Hindu kingdom of Vijayanagar in order to later expand in southern India. He was a thoughtful man who tolerated the religious differences in

Turkish people known as the Mughals extended their authority and their empire to much of the subcontinent.

There was many motives and reasons for countries to attempt to imperialize the Indian subcontinent. During the 16th and 17th centuries, France, Portugal and England all competed for influence along the southeast coast of India. They were interested in the Indian subcontinent because they wanted to trade for goods that could not be found anywhere else such as silk, spices, foreign animals and etc. England ended up dominating the region and was able to take control due to two major reasons. One, the decline of the Mughal Empire allowed England to be more powerful and two, because many Indians were willing to allow Britain to rule. As a result, England created a joint-stock company to pursue trade with the Indian subcontinent called the “British East India Company,” lasting from 1700 to

The shift in trade routes affect the Islamic empires because the political decline turned into the evident in the three Islamic empires. In the eighteen century, the Indian was very active in long distance trading. Because of the long-term trading it was a lot of discoveries in European explore. In order to acquire

The Mughal led one of the world's most powerful empire. Babur is the founder of the dynasty and led the invasion of India from Central Asia. It is traditional the invasion route that passed through Afghanistan. Despite the overload of odds against him and only modest military means, Babur was able to unify power in Central Asia before capturing Delhi in 1526. Akbar(his grandson) was truly one of the best rulers that the world has known. He ruled with an amazing sense of justice and fairness plus had the unique ability to combine competing customs and religious traditions, which was no small feat on the South Asian subcontinent.

India’s dynasties were so different from China’s and Persia’s dynasties. India was a lot more culturally diverse, and their ruling revolved around their culture and religious tradition. The Mauryan and Gupta dynasties both got their structure and foundations from the Persian empire and their leaders. Darius established Achaemenid rule and administration in India, and then Alexander the Great came and stayed for a short time, and then left. Though Alexander the Great did not leave an impression on them, he started a power vacuum, which Chandragupta filled, and started the Mauryan empire. He continued to use the Persian technique of administration and he laid the foundation of centralized rule, the first on to do that in India. Chandragupta did this by first taking control of the small provinces of Magadha and working his way to the center of India. In fourth century BCE, the empire stretched all the way from Indus to Ganges River in North India.

Over the course of the 16th and 17th centuries, two men, who themselves did not cross paths, made their mark on history. Both men lived extraordinary lives, with Malik Ambar transitioning from being an African slave brought to India as a child to a major influence among the elite on the Deccan plateau, and Banarasidas, a merchant, provide insight into the period when the Mughal empire ruled the majority of the region that is India. Examining their lives, both Ambar and Banarasidas were influenced by the religion and politics of the era, but their experiences do not necessarily reflect one another's in every aspect.

This makes sense when first looked at, but the “imperial overstretch” argument ignores the fact that as late as the 18th century, India was the second wealthiest society in the world. In 1526, Babur is said to have invaded India with 12,000 cavalrymen, but by the time of Shah Jahan, the imperial military reached 300,000 soldiers, of whom 200,000 were armed cavalrymen. The only way that the Mughals could support so massive a military was with an equally massive military budget. According to the economic historian Angus Maddison, India had been the largest economy in the world until it was surpassed in size by China, circa 1500, and between 1500 and 1700, the subcontinent still accounted for a full 25 percent of total world economic output.

Discuss the decline of the Mughal Empire. To what extent do you agree that the downfall of the Mughal Empire was caused by the agrarian crisis of the 17th and 18th century?