The National Front Analysis

Anti-Semitism changed the French perspective of Jews before and after the Vel d’Hiv Roundup in July 1942, because this Roundup was the first time the French government explicitly targeted foreign and French Jews alike without pressure from German occupiers. The French government explicitly designed and carried out the Vel d’Hiv Roundup where they collected all of the Jews in Paris, France on their own accord and sent them to concentration camps to be exterminated. While holding in scope two years prior, 1940-1, and one year, 1943, following the Roundup, the changing perspective in Paris, France, of mutual obliviousness to sympathy, is evident by the analysis of anti-Semitic legislature, the influence of German occupation, and the leading operations of the French government. The changing perspectives in Paris show that a majority of society will follow their government (without rebelling) until this influence affects society as a whole, and alters the way of life. The government and societal viewpoint of Jews transformed together, but arrived at opposing conclusions – anti-Semitism and pro-Semitism respectively. This transformation became definitive after the Vel d’Hiv Roundup in Paris on July 16-17, 1942. This claim holds relevance to current knowledge and culture by providing an example of profound importance on the influence of governmental actions and its own societal standpoint in connection with world issues. In respect to this claim direct governmental actions

The decision to enter into war is usually a great struggle involving many factors. Some countries, however, such as France in 1940, do not have much choice in the matter. France’s leaders struggled with the feelings of autonomy and responsibility. France's struggle entering into World War II was in the difficulty in fulfilling its dual responsibility to the people of France and to the rest of the world whom both maintained conflicting beliefs about the approaching war. The French people desired peace, while the other countries required France to go to war to defend itself against

BBC News, What next for Marine Le Pen’s National Front?, News Europe, cited 15 Apr 2013, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17824436

Although Canada can be defined as a nation state, its vast landscape means many people are faced with different views and mindsets. Source one simply shows the differences within the nation of Canada. Eastern and Western Canada, because of their geographical differences, can be faced with contending loyalties when it comes to some nations aspects of life. Different lifestyles under the same set of government creates a physiological barrier between a nation. The source also shows the differences in Quebec nationalism compared to the rest of Canada. Some groups like the FLQ or the Front for Liberation of Quebec are known for their extremist views of Quebec nationalism. The small group called the FLQ was active in the 1960’s and 1970’s and they

The popular front led by Leon Blum, was the socialist government from 1936 which put in place the ‘Matignon Agreement’. Several developments established during the period of governing such as raising wages, and introducing the forty hour working week (James, 2003, p.124). Although they had in a sense united workers and employers, the adverse consequences resulted in a radicalised nation, with strong policing on tax evasion, and the reforms were substantially expensive (James, 2003, pp.124-125). Politically, the poor stability of the French economy didn’t allow Blum and his party to enforce their power across Europe. With the German economy recovering rapidly, and the vast military production, France simply didn’t have the resources to match up to the threat posed upon them (James, 2003, p.125).

In the immediate aftermath of the election, conservative opinions on the Goldwater campaign varied. While some praised Goldwater’s efforts and held out hope for continuing conservative momentum, others saw his defeat not only as an individual defeat, but also as the derailing of the entire conservative movement. On the day after the election, the New York Times argued that “Barry Goldwater not only lost the presidential election… but the conservative cause as well.” This conclusion would be later discredited by continued conservative success in the mid-term elections of 1966 and the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980. “Paradoxically, Goldwater’s monumental loss marked the beginning of a shift to the Right that would eventually end 50 years

The Federalists were opposed to supporting the French, and this belief is backed up by the author’s rash description of the current state of France. France had an opportunity had freedom, but in the eyes of the author, they have squandered that chance. In the event of the violence spreading to the United States the author is optimistic that the people will band together in defense of the government, and all that the country stands for.

With the growing divide between the public and military he intends to have ages 18-21 year old men and women sever at least one month of mandatory service. As an advocate of military strength, Le Pen has stated interest in increasing the military force by 50,000 troops. To accompany the increased manning, she will push to increase the defense budget significantly to match the needs of costs to maintain that large of a military as well as advancing military equipment. In the end, one of her goals that would be supported in increasing French Military prestige would be to leave NATO, making them one of the first to pull out. (Smith, 2017) Ultimately Emmanuel Marcon won the election by 66.1% (Mulholland, Samuel, Rothwell, Kirk, & Henderson, 2017).

Respond to the question: How do you think the male-female breakdown of the population would have affected life in New France at that time?

Fascism actually started in the 1920’s with the Ku Klux Klan. Speaking of this, another pro-fascist journalist; William Whittaker was a former leader of the Ku Klux Klan as well. He also managed to maintain a strong base of supporters that consisted of the Winnipeg police and civic authorities.[11] Continuing onwards, Father Lionel Grouxl was the earliest influential “Quebec figure,” who organized a boycott on the Jewish shops called, “achat chez nous” meaning “buy from our own.” [12] Moving forth once again, a brief background on Adrien Arcand. Arcand was an admirer of Adolf Hitler and looked to him for his inspiration, propaganda and funding were also provided by the Nazi. In 1934, Arcand formed the “National Socialist Christian Party” and referred to himself as the “Canadian Führer.” [13] Arcand too, believed in law and order, a strong leader, and “a Canada free of Jews.” During the years of 1936 and 1938, Arcand was also “supported by Quebec’s Provincial Government.” Not forgetting to mention that one of the worst race riots in Toronto’s history happened at the Christie pits. [14] On the day of August 14, 1933, a Jewish baseball team; the Harbod Playground, won a game at the Christie Pits. Many of the Pit Gang members lifted up a Swastika-emblazoned sweater into the air and some painted a giant Swastika and the words “Hail Hitler” on the clubhouse roof. During

Throughout the history of political parties and factions, none has been so infamous as that of the Nazi party. They were the world’s enemies for a decade in the early twentieth century, and still continue to stir up controversy throughout the world. Understanding what the Nazis believed in, how anti semitism contributed to Nazi beliefs, and if Nazis still exist today helps to conclude why they did certain actions.

Jews that identified as French could no longer and the search for a Jewish nationalism began. Theodore Herzl, an Austrian journalist, and founder of modern political Zionism studied the outbreak of anti-Semitism throughout France as he paid close attention to the Dreyfus affair.20 Herzl observed that anti-Semitism was prevalent and inevitable even in countries as forward thinking as France. Kerry Bolton, a scholar, noted

All Quiet on the Western Front and Dulce Et Decorum Est are similar in that they show the brutality and bloodiness of war. In All Quiet On The Western Front they had to put gas mask on because the enemy throws gas at the soldiers and if one of them didn’t put the mask on and he would die and the other soldiers couldn’t do anything about the situation. Paul went to help his friends put his gas mask on before he dies, he grabs “his mask and pull(s) it over his head”(Remarque 21). From the poem it says GAS! GAS! Quick boys -- which mean quick put mask before the gas kills you he said in the poem of Dulce Et Decorum Est.

The French Revolution directly affected the nineteenth century through the creation of many ideologies, one important one being nationalism. Nationalism is a very controversial ideology because of the many diverse approaches towards its true definition. A broad definition of nationalism could be perceived as a strong devotion towards the culture and identity of a nation. As well as the idea that nations will benefit more from acting as an independent nation opposed to multiple states working together as a collective. Its emergence completely changed the political map of Europe and resulted in the birth of many new nations. There are many different views towards the true reason for the emergence of Nationalism in Europe. Many historians believe the emergence can be credited to the French Revolution and later the continuation of ideas under Napoleon Bonaparte. While others believe the Industrial Revolution held more importance for the widespread arrival of nationalism. It seems better to encompass both and argue that the emergence of nationalism in Europe was caused by the French Revolution, Napoleon Bonaparte’s rule, and the Industrial Revolution.

Nechaev’s idea of political provocation was to anticipate the Russian government’s response and use the response in order to radicalize people. For example he sent letters to people, knowing that they would be intercepted and those to whom the letters were addressed to would be thrown in jail. In jail people would either break, which were exactly the kind of people Nechaev did not want, or they would harder and become radicalized. By committing an act and anticipating the overreaction of the government, Nechaev was actually able to use the unknowing Russian government in order to assist in the radicalization process. This idea applies to the Anglo-Saxon approach of dealing with terrorism. Unlike the Russian approach of blind persecution, the Anglo-Saxon approach ignores the non-violent radicals and only concentrates on violent terrorists. By learning from the mistakes of the Russians the Angelo- Saxon approach only deals with legitimate threats, thereby rendering political provocation useless.