preview

The Negotiation Between The City Of Calgary And The Calgary NHL Team

Good Essays

“The actors are gamely delivering their lines in another revival of the world's most shopworn drama.” These are the words the author of the Globe & Mail editorial “No, you really don’t have to subsidize an NHL team” has chosen to introduce the article. Strong words that are meant to introduce, and summarize what he believes to be a large issue in the Calgary community. The article focuses on the negotiations between the city of Calgary and the Calgary Flames, an NHL franchised hockey team. The author offers a persuasive argument that uses examples and quotations to appeal to various aspects of the readers thinking patterns. These aspects include, the logical, emotional, and the credible ways that humans develop thoughts. Using these three …show more content…

It only requires the reader to agree with the fact that if something has been constantly occurring throughout history it will continue to happen. The author takes advantage of this fundamental level of thinking and uses it to put forth the argument that Calgary should not feel obligated to finance the arena because in the past teams have not left their respectful cities due to situations of this nature.
In the article the author makes and assumption that could weaken the logical structure of the argument. The author assumes the reader has little pre- existing knowledge of how sports teams operate in cities and chooses to use “selective logic” to convince the reader. For example, the majority of teams may have stayed in their cities in similar situations that are occurring in Calgary, but there have been teams who have actually left their cities due to discussions such as this. For example, the Seattle Sonics in 2007 were looking to make upgrades to their arena, but due to a lack of funding the team ended up moving to Oklahoma City where they now reside as the Thunder. This is an example of using selective logic. The author chooses to avoid this example in the article because it would weaken the argument that is being presented. The author “selected” pieces of evidence with a purpose to convince the reader of the unlikelihood that the Calgary Flames will not leave Calgary if they do not receive funding. This

Get Access