The Organizational Model Decision Making

Decision-making in the workforce is a process of responsibilities used by upper management to implement, enforce rules, regulations, and maintain a successful environment. Decision-making implemented more effectively by making a plan, thinking it through, accepting more than one opinion and determining what is best. However, decision-making often utilized more effectively by opening doors of opportunities for a suggestion, question, discussion, and feedback. Although, more involvement helps improve understanding, utilize behavior skills and present opportunities for better communication. Everyday life consists of decision-making, the right decision may not always be applied, but ensure room for improvement and opportunity. Individuals approached decision-making in many different ways. As stated by (Jones, Graham, & Bateman, 2006) decision making is a procedure used to recognize a problem, weigh the alternatives and evaluate a solution in which, certain situations will require different approaches to become effective.

A number of approaches are offered for organizational science to solve the problem regarding organizational gap between theory and practice. The rational model can be considered as a dominant model on organizational science among the others with the purpose of defining organization as instruments for attaining goals instead of dealing with problems .Furthermore, objectives are defined in favour of organization progress regardless of employees’ ideas in such a model. It is mainly assumed that involved individuals in the organisation’s activities agree reasonably with its major purposes. The main task of managers are

In addition, the third model is satisfying solutions. In this model, there are six steps to define and rate criteria and alternatives (Gary, 1997). These steps need to be followed when one is making a decision based on criteria. The first step is to define the problem by “diagnosing the problem in terms of its symptoms” (Gary, 1997). Secondly, the criteria must be identified. After the criterion has been identified, it must be assigned a numerical value based on its importance. Thence, alternatives should be generated, alternatives rated upon each criterion, and the values summed and weighed (Gary, 1997). This model is best used when an organization must make major decisions. For example, when an

Today, new organizations are being formed continuously and, as a result, competition is fierce. It is key that organizations should use be able to make well-informed decision in order to be successful in business. However, most of these organizations are not able to make decisions effectively due to business data are not kept appropriately. Furthermore, if organizations do not provide strategic information for making decisions, the organizations will not gain competitive advantages, nor predict future outcomes. Thus, revenues and profits of organizations will be affected. Therefore, by considering this issue, it might be possible to offer solutions for organizations to develop effective decision making strategies.

In every day to day operations decision need to be made in most of different types of business. In the process of the decision making the person in concern must be financially orientated; decisions should be based on the effectiveness of its cost and if it meet the organization needs and if it would have any kind of positive or negative impact on the organization profitability.

Decisions are required in all that we think, do and say. In fact, it is impossible to go through a day without making a decision. Do I get out of bed today? Do I eat breakfast before leaving for work? What shall I eat for breakfast? These are simple examples, but we also face life-changing decisions as we go through life. We find ourselves asking such questions as, "Do I return to school?" "Do I want to have any children?" "What career path do I want to pursue?" Choosing a career path essentially boils down to a career-making process. Making this type of a decision requires relying on information available and systematically analyzing that information through critical thinking to come to a viable

The decisions that we make and follow on a daily basis have different bearings on the business. Some are simple, but others are quite complicated because they pose a long lasting bearing on the enterprise. Decisions will be determined by the type of decision to make, the time factor, resources available and the nature of tasks at hand among others. In so doing, it is imperative to understand the mindset of the decision makers at these times when they face the uphill tasks of making a decision that will have a bearing on the performance of the organization or

“Decision making is a complex cognitive process influenced by a number of factors” (Johnson & Kruse, 2009, p. 33). A leader is called on to make numerous decisions each day to meet the needs of their organization. The individuals associated with an organization look to the leader to have the answers to the many problems that present themselves. The challenge for the leader to is to make the “right” decision, but what the right decision is varies and is not always clear. The decision-making approach a leader takes can greatly impact the success of an organization, and a leader must always weigh their decisions carefully. The high stakes and complexity of decision making for

As stated by Prasad (2008), the managers should identify the different choices available in order to get most acceptable outcome of a decision. From searching different alternatives the managers can evade blocks in operations as choices are suitable if a particular idea goes wrong. Khanka (2000) expresses the view that selections can developed from in many ways such as can get from sources like experience, do training other organizations, and take others ideas and suggestions related in problems. Furthermore to improve alternatives solution the managers may investigation the signs of a problem for clues or fall back on intuition or result that stated by Griffin and Moorhead (2010). For an example in marketing department a non-programmed decision is compulsory the manager have to produce alternatives for raise market share. As McShane and Von Glinow (2000) pointed out that in a programmed decision is a standard operations is not to generate choice but can take out from the documented that already saved. Next an organizer should search the mission of a decision. In other words they need to define what is to be accomplished by it (Quick & Nelson, 2013). The decision criteria are important as mentioned by Dubrin (2002). The several criteria are consumers must aware of varies in quality of products, there not happen inflation, workers must consider the quality of improvements and lastly job satisfaction should not be reduce.

A model of decision making known as the Rational Decision Making Model arises from organization behavior. This includes working through series of five stages path from problem identification and to the solutions.

The decision is to select an action among a number of actions that solves a given problem, that prevents a problem from happening, or that forces to apply new ideas for development. The need for understanding decision making process is increasing because the complexity of modern organizations is increasing, and because the modern organizations' effectiveness depends on the decisions made by the managers. The question is how to select the most appropriate action to solve the problem satisfying all stakeholders.

The focus of my term paper is the decision making process used by today's top-level managers. Top-level managers, such as Chief Executive Officers (CEOs), Chief Operations Officers (COOs), and Chief Financial Officers (CFOs), must make critical decisions on a daily basis. Their choices and the resulting outcomes affect the company, the employees, and the stakeholders. Due to the high importance of their decisions, the process they use to reach them merits a close examination.

Because of the growth of economic markets, developments in the legal system and transformations in the nature of authority, organizational analysis arose. Weber views organizational efficiency as product of the mix of two structures namely: first, a scheme of clear specific and categorical rules and policies implemented by a specific detail organizational structure and documentations and second, a unique division of labor. Authority departs from once known as succession to a now bureaucratic one that drives those from lower levels of the structure to obey managers. Organizational analysis finds ways in which organizational goals affect organizational structures. Another model of organizational analysis that arose was that of Simon and Marsh that states that organizational decision makers base decision makers on uncertainty of situations confronting the organizations (Hannah,

It is advisable to involve as many people as are needed in making a decision. In making collective decisions, specific expertise as well as experience of a person both can be used simultaneously. The decision-maker, having weighed the advice of experts and experienced hands, must then use authority to ensure that the final decision is seen through.

The overall purpose of this research paper is to define and assess decision making in management as well as the need for alternatives to use in the decision making processes. Management is concerned with combining all of the inputs of production. Managers decide what to make and how to make it. They chose from the available inputs and work out the right mix. Management must organize production to meet the goals of the company, which normally include keeping manufacturing costs low and producing a profit. The first industrial managers were men like Richard Arkwright and Thomas Edison, both inventors and businessmen. They own their companies and made all the management decisions. As the scale of production increased in the 19th century,