The way in which I have decided to break down this paper is that I will dedicate roughly a page to each literary journal, starting with the oldest and working my way through to the most recent. It is my intention to break down each book into sections:
The Physical Aesthetic— paying particular attention to the physical attributes that make up the magazine i.e. the cover, the font, the leading, the paper quality and weight, the use of space and layout. This should be-at first analyzed void of content in order to have a clear and concise image in my mind, and in this essay as to what stands out and detracts from the physicality of the piece.
Content— In this section I will examine what the overall content of the magazine says about it as a
…show more content…
The only time san-serif font appears in the magazine is on the exterior covers, it brings up a question of consistency, it becomes visually jarring to go from san-serif to serif throughout. Even if they had just chosen to make the embolden headers a san-serif it would have brought th exterior throughout the interior and the magazine as a whole would look uniform. The change in paper quality for the section of art submissions is jarring, particularly because the glossed pages are so white versus the eggshell color of the rest of the book. Page 22 is a complete waste of space.
Content
Starting with the ‘history of Grub Street’ street section, the font is distracting and needlessly decorative. The ‘Staff’ section looks like a jumble. I have some problem with the table of contents just because it doesn’t describe the actual way the magazine unfolds but since it’s broken down by genre, its acceptable. Now onto the other content. The first freaking piece, the first one, the piece that sets the pace and tone for the entire book, or at least it should. This is the piece they chose, The Main Line. I immediately wonder about the credibility of the writer. It sets a bad taste in my mouth and admittedly colors my opinion for the rest of the book. The wide range—and I use the term ‘wide’ loosely—gives off the feeling that this was possibly the only submissions
The font of the text on the front cover, and throughout the book for that matter, is in an untidy scrawl that is both important - in that it is in a bold font and is a demanding colour (either black or white) - and is informal, imperfect, personal and human - in that it is handwritten. These aspects combine to show the picture-book
Adopting an Approach has many strong arguments and claims throughout the manuscript. Particularly in the beginning, Beard does a great job of enticing the assumed college-level reader and relating to that specific audience. She does this when explaining, “understanding the images around us,” by talking about a French perfume advertisement. By doing this, she relates to the age group that would be reading this manuscript by combining something that they might be familiar with, to something they are unfamiliar with. Although this is initially a strong way to go about attracting the reader, it needs to be done at the right moments. On pages fourteen and fifteen, she gives many more unrelated examples, which ultimately, causes the reader to forget the original point trying to be made. Beard’s claim needed to be made quicker, before the reader loses sight of what the article is about. If this article were to be published in the Undergraduate’s Guide to Art History, I would eliminate a lot of the extra examples that aren’t necessary to get
Intertwined within the novel is the presence of many different genres including letters, articles and magazine clippings, and pictures. At first sight there is the
Thomas C. Foster in ‘How to Read Literature like a Professor’, references the different literary devices that authors use in literature, in order to enhance the reader’s ability to critically analyze literature from any time period. Foster expands the reader’s understanding of literature by exploring the profound impact of symbols and common themes on literature.
Knowing that this book is very "wordy", I was excited to determine the readability of the text. To determine this I used a website created by Brian Scott. The site allows users to copy and paste passages from the textbook to be analyzed. From my textbook, I copied and pasted two separate sections. I copied from the introduction of
When I took off the top to that white box on that calm Sunday night, I was instantly transported into this astounding library, that seemed to come out of a movie scene, rows upon rows were piled up with Verne’s, Dumas’, Stevenson’s, and Melville’s. Each week I would open this box and choose a new book. It wasn’t long until weeks turned to days, and I began to greedily treasure my Stevenson’s, truly value friendship with Dumas, prepare for an adrenaline rush with Verne, but most importantly, it was my single Melville that brought me the pinnacle of happiness.
The writing style gave you a choice on what interesting subject you wanted to read, and also it gave you a preview of what the chapter was going to be about. The style of how it was written could also be a struggle for people. This book would not be recommended for people who wanted to stick to one specific subject; it would be a book for people who wanted an array of subjects. He does stick to one specific concept, which was bias. He has this subject scattered through the book, and they all mean different things. The experiments could be seen in positive light or negative, it depends on the type of reader you are. They can come out to be confusing but when you are able to play out the experiment it may be fun. The presentation of the book itself is an eye catcher, and maybe even the reading style will intrigue you to read it. This book is very intricate but you will not know if the information that is given will
How to Read Literature Like a Professor: A Lively and Entertaining Guide to Reading Between the Lines by Thomas C. Foster is a book that explains there is more to literature than just a few words on a paper or a few pages in a book. Thomas Foster’s book portrays a relatable message to a wide based audience. This book is relatable for two reasons, the way it is written and the examples it uses. The book is written in a conversational manner, as if the reader was in a group discussion about books and writing. As for the examples, they are informative, descriptive, relative, and entertaining.
of literature at the University of Canberra and I today present to you, the national library
Perused those title Furthermore front and once more blankets. Take a gander at those extent of the font, the illustrations, the white space, and the number for pages.
I absolutely love the text, A Bad Case of Stripes. The illustrators use of bright and vibrant colors have always appealed to me. While reading this text, I’m amazed at how the illustrations match certain details of the story perfectly. For example, at school Camilla and her classmates cite “the Pledge of Allegiance, Camilla’s stripes turned red, white, and blue…” The illustrations support the text perfectly, as Camilla is shown with red, white, and blue stripes. This reminds me of a statement in the textbook, “The picture book constructs an intertextuality between the textual and visual representations: the illustrations and text convey the relationship between the pictures and words” (Botelho & Rudman, 2009, pg. 167). While the illustrations
When I first read the article, I went fast enough so I understood the purpose of the article. My second time reading the article I went slow and looked at all the details and aspects it presented. Originally I thought the main point of the article was how books were not being published in the the time period they were intended for, which is not wrong, but the main point is to show how copyright is keeping books off the shelves of readers.
Kennedy, X.J. and Dana Gioia. Literature: an Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. New York: Pearson Longman, 2010.
“A & P.” Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. Ed. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. 10th ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2007. 16-20.
As the era of literature slowly declines, the expert critiques and praise for literature are lost. Previously, novels were bursting at the seams with metaphors, symbolism, and themes. In current times, “novels” are simply short stories that have been elaborated on with basic plot elements that attempt to make the story more interesting. Instead of having expert critical analysis written about them, they will, most likely, never see that, as recent novels have nothing to analyze. Even books are beginning to collect dust, hidden away and forgotten, attributing to the rise of companies such as Spark Notes. An author deserves to have his work praised, no matter how meager and the masses should have the right to embrace it or to reject it. As