Research, Writing & Advocacy 2006-07 THE PARADIGM FOR PREDICTIVE LEGAL WRITING: Using “IRAC” I. INTRODUCTION This handout sets out the basic paradigm, or organizational structure, of predictive legal analysis, referred to throughout this course as “IRAC.”1 IRAC is a general analytical paradigm; as you gain experience in your legal writing, you will be able to modify this paradigm to fit a particular legal issue. Once you understand the IRAC structure and are able to use it fluently, you can decide when it might be appropriate to modify the IRAC paradigm in a particular situation. Understand that an IRAC is not a stand alone legal document. The IRAC analysis is part of the discussion section of an office memorandum. You will learn how to …show more content…
This option may, in fact, be more helpful to your reader. The following are examples of topic sentences identifying the issue under analysis in the form of a conclusion: Green had neither actual nor constructive notice of Brown’s problem because Brown never spoke with Green or an agent of Green but merely left a message on Green’s answering machine. The second factor, which examines family and business ties to a jurisdiction, probably undercuts Doe’s claim to being domiciled in Arkansas, because Doe’s family, friends, and job prospects remain in Mississippi. Note that, even in the form of a conclusion, the topic sentence still clearly alerts the reader to the issue under discussion and advances the facts relevant to the determination of that issue. B. RULE (Rule Statement and Rule Explanation) Next, you must discuss the law that defines or governs the issue. A complete discussion of the rule requires a statement of the rule of law on the particular issue under discussion and a detailed explanation of the rule from precedent cases. Statement of the Rule The statement of the rule governing the issue places the rest of the analysis in context for the reader. You will rely on this statement of the rule to reach your conclusion. In many instances, you will need to synthesize a rule of law from two or more cases. Often rules are not explicitly stated in any one of the relevant cases. The writer must formulate a general principle
Legal research is not only about discovering how the law applies, it is also about determining how strong case is. Using legal research we are analyzing strength and weaknesses of client’s case, and using counteranalysis we determine how opponent can use weaknesses against us. In this paper we will establish why counteranalysis is important and why do we use it, when we use it and where we can apply it.
This letter is to inform you, that your tax appeal hearing has been scheduled for March 6, 2005, at 10:30 a.m. The hearing will be held at the County Office building located at 211 Race Road. The court room is located on the 5th floor.
2) Deductive logic starts with a premise and applies it to a specific case to reach a conclusion
4. Analysis related to hiring the outside law firm and sensitivity of the value of information to their prediction accuracy
This letter is to advise you that your tax appeal hearing is coming up on March 6, 2005 at 10:35 a.m. at the Office of the Tax Assessors of Lackawanna County. The office is located on the 5th floor of the County Office Building; 211 Ace Road, Clark, Pennsylvania 18111. Attorney Smith would like to remind you to arrive at the County Office Building at 10:25 a.m. with all of the pictures you have of the comparable houses in your area.
Underline the reason (topic sentence) in each body paragraph. Is the reason clearly connected to the overarching argument? If not, how might the writer address this?
Introduce the first main point of the argument. Then, provide evidence from the sources. Multiple pieces of evidence should be provided to support the main point.
(c) Notwithstanding Subsection (b), an owner, lessee, or occupant of land may be liable for injury to a child caused by a highly dangerous artificial condition on the land if:
This document was prepared by Frances Tuer and edited by Jacqueline Glenney and Michael Robertson. It was designed to help students in MGMT 1P96 understand the case analysis process.
In Chapter One of Becoming a Critical Thinker, by Sherry Diestler, the structure of arguments and how to become a critical thinker is discussed. Critical thinking is necessary to make sound decisions. According to the text “A critical thinker is someone who uses specific criteria to evaluate reasoning, form positions and make decisions” (pg 3). Issues, conclusions and reasons build an argument. Conclusions about an issue need to be supported by reasons.
Furthermore, legal responsibility is willing to accept fault, knowing when to ask questions of a supervisor to more clearly meet the needs of the client. Kaslow, Grus, Campbell, & Fouad, et al., 2009). Moreover, this insightful implementation is the ability to
1. The issue is whether public school officials have the authority to perform strip searches of students in suspicion of hiding illegal drugs.
The 14th Amendment states: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
1 la prohibición del legislador de hacer discriminaciones entre los distintos sujetos de derecho 2 obligación que tiene el legislador de apreciar las diferencias