Before answering the research question, it is imperative to comprehend why performance of ESG-focused funds in general should, or should not, diverge from conventional funds. The first part of this literature review, therefore, assess findings regarding the performance pattern associated with ESG activities. In the specific, the research analyzes the differences between ESG funds and conventional funds. Thereafter, the analysis moves towards the understanding and description of the social/behavioral set of rules that is encouraging the movement towards a more ESG conscious way of investing. A section regarding the direct connection between financial performance and ESG practices explores a series of relevant articles. Following this, a more detail description of Environmental, Social and Governance practices is given. This covers the core information necessary to structure the forthcoming conceptual framework; here the expatiation regarding the relationship between mutual fund returns and ESG practices are depicted. Moreover, the reasoning behind the inclusion of “ESG factor” in modern pricing models is justified.
GENERAL INTRO In the past decades, SRI and ESG-focus have been heavily covered in the literature with mixed results. Bauer et al. (2002) compare performance of mutual funds that follow social responsible investment strategies against those that do not. By applying a four-factor Carhart (1997) model, the results are depends widely on the country of operation of the
Environmentally sound investments are more available this century than ever before. Such investments are known as Social Funds. Social Funds made its debut
Socially responsible investing (SRI), also known as sustainable, socially conscious, "green" or ethical investing, is any investment strategy which seeks to consider both financial return and social good. This paper would argue that SRI is not only beneficial because it is sustainable policy but also that it yields almost the same or even higher returns for its investors. First, paper would give general information about SRI, its history and development issues. Then, it would focus on the financial returns to shareholders and argue that return on investments for companies that adopted SRI in their policies is the same as the general market. Finally, it would talk about what are the future prospects for companies that adopted SRI policy despite some of the latest drawbacks.
The objective of Dewey Cheatum & Howe (DCH)’s emerging markets fund is to generate attractive excess return over investing in US stocks with comparable volatility by investing in a globally diversified portfolio of emerging and developed market instruments. An emerging market fund is required for DCH for the following reasons
One of the great arguments that fund managers use is that it is easier to diversify the portfolio with managed funds than it is for direct shares. The theory is that we should not hold shares in only one or two companies – we need to
This essay sets out to know which type of investment fund is better for a retail investor. By this, we will consider the meaning and operations of an index tracker fund, as well as that of the actively managed funds. Furthermore, identify the advantages of index tracker funds over actively managed funds and draw conclusions in relation to the topic above.
As corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts continue to grow within industries world-wide, the pursuit of sustainably responsible investment (SRI) is becoming increasingly popular among investors looking to create a positive societal impact. Similar to ethical consumption, an organization’s sustainability initiatives can motivate investors to not only provide monetary support for their company (stock holdings), but to influence their business decisions through shareholder advocacy as well (Voorhis & Humphreys, 2011). Therefore, companies who highlight and publish their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data are taking advantage of the increasingly popular market for SRI. In addition, community investing provides opportunities for investors to financially engage with communities directly in an effort to create social growth (Voorhis & Humphreys, 2011). Consequently, independent organizations and financial advisors are providing in-depth company research and industry examinations (screenings), which go beyond the financial aspects of investing and assist potential investors in their decision making processes. Within the power point presentation, a thorough analysis of both SRI and ESG factors are highlighted as well as their industry and investor significance. Furthermore, notable positive attributes of SRI are noted in an attempt to showcase its attractiveness along with specific examples of three corporations that have excelled in their ESG practices.
We then match the IPO database with the CSR database. We gather CSR data from MSCI KLD 400 Social Index Database. This data set is the most comprehensive CSR database and is widely used in the literature (Agle et al., 1999; Chen et al., 2007; Griffin and Mahon, 1997; Hillman and Keim, 2001; Rehbein et al., 2004; Waddock and Graves, 1997). The MSCI KLD database provides social performance records for more than 3,000 publicly traded US companies across a range of dimensions covering business-related social performance parameters including corporate governance, environment, product quality, and employment practices (Chen et al., 2007). The MSCI database assigns strengths and concerns to each of these dimensions. Detailed
Another abstract contributes to the research of the 100 companies to work for is Ahmed, Nanda, & Schnusenberg (2010). This research aim to identify “Can Firms Do Well While Doing Good?” in term of applying to financial economic. They are looking at the relationship between a firm’s social responsibility and its performance. They argue that Fortune’s approach to identify the Best Companies to Work For is mainly based on employee (not shareholder) surveys, which may provide a more direct measure of the relationship between a firm’s degree of social responsibility and its financial performance.
Social responsible programs are growing very rapidly. “Over the last two years, SRI investing has grown by more than 22% to $3.74 trillion in total managed assets, suggesting that investors are investing with their heart, as well as their head” (Chamberlain, 2013). Investors are caring about their
This Investment Policy Statement is composed for the purpose of guiding the formation of a mindful investment schema for the management of the University of Pittsburgh’s Young Money Novelists (YMN) Investment Fund, and is comprised of three main sections in accordance with the critical methods of portfolio management (planning, execution, and feedback).
This chapter gives a brief introduction to hedge funds and hedge fund data. Hedge funds are generally considered as private investment vehicles for wealthy individual and institutional investors. According to the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, participators are limited to at most 500 ‘qualified investors’, individuals who have at least $5 Million to invest in hedge funds and institutional investors with capital of at least $25 Million (Brown and Goetzmann, 2001). Normally, hedge funds are organized as limited partnerships, in which individual and institutional investors are limited partners and the hedge fund managers are general partners (Fung and Hsieh, 1999). To ensure the common economic benefit for investors and managers, hedge fund managers usually take a portion of their own wealth to invest in the funds. The fees charged by the investors consist of the fixed management fee and performance-based fee. The performance-based fee, which is significantly higher than fixed management fee, is paid to successful hedge fund managers. Although hedge funds influence the market dramatically, little about what they really do is understood publicly. Brown and Goetzmann (2001) state that the term ‘hedge fund’ seems to imply market neutral and low risk trading strategies, whereas hedge funds appear to have a high level of risk because of the extensive use of leverage.
We selected 5 mutual funds that have 80% of more invested in stock equity securities in the mutual fund. The 5 mutual funds all have different investment styles according to Morningstar. The investment objective defines what each mutual fund’s long term goals are. It includes things such as required return, the risk tolerance, and investment time horizon. The investment style is the different strategy used to set asset allocation of the mutual fund. It sets expectations for long term portfolio performance. For example, VTICX focuses on large blend, where HASCX focuses on small blend; meaning that they will target different portfolio asset allocations. Each fund will allocate its funds differently and in different proportions. The investment strategy is a set of rules, behaviors or procedures designed to guide an investor's selection of an investment portfolio. For example, VTICX looks into stocks that pay lower dividends and are included in the Russell 1000 Index so they can provide a tax-efficient investment return consisting of long-term capital appreciation. Behind every capital investment there is a strategy. Arithmetic mean returns are the total average of the returns for the last ten years (07-16) of
In today’s day and age, there is a tremendous number of financial vehicles that each and every investor can place their money in. Investors place their money into each of these financial tools in order to make any sort of profit. Obviously, investors do whatever is in their power to make the largest profit possible. Bonds, stocks, and mutual funds are three of these many options for financial growth. Unfortunately, people that may have heard of these do not take advantage of them at all. Bonds, stocks, and mutual funds are relatively simple financial vehicles and people today do not jump on the opportunity to invest. A large majority of people do not explore their options when it comes to allowing their money grow exponentially.
In this paper Cheng et al. (2014) argued that the implementation of successful CSR policies leads to lower idiosyncratic risk due to improved stakeholder engagement, which reduce agency costs of an organisation, and increased transparency, which results a company becoming less capitally constrained and enhances a firm’s access to finance in capital markets. In order to achieve their aim the authors use cross sectional analysis of firms around the world and apply different variables and methods. They concluded that there is a link between good CSR activities and access to finance; however, social and environmental components of CSR are more significant for investors than the factor of governance since the former ones have higher impact on capital constraints.
Since mutual fund has been a primary investment instrument in the U.S. financial market as well as other countries around the world. The valuation of mutual fund’s performance has been drawn enormous attention from both financial practitioners and academics. Financial models have been established and developed in the financial market and these models have the purpose of assessing the expected returns of stocks and evaluating their performance related to the exposure to the market. The exploration for the risk-related asset pricing model that clarifies variations in stock returns is one of the most important issues in finance. Apparently, the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which is proposed by Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965), and the Fama and French three factors model, which is proposed by Fama and French (1992, 1993 and 1995), are relatively significant and conventional finance models. It has been almost fifty years since the CAPM was put forward.