After reading the case study, I have come to the conclusion that Tersea has plagiarized, and that she has failed to take into consideration the concepts of justice and human dignity that apply to acknowledging sources in academic writing for many reasons. Teresa has plagiarized a passage from King Lear. Teresa performed Find-Replace plagiarism. Find-Replace plagiarism is changing key words and phrases but retaining the essential content of the source. (YV) In Teresa’s case, she paraphrased a passage from King Lear and changed the wording of it. She did not cite the source because she felt that she changed it substantially. Although she had changed the wording, she still plagiarized the idea that someone else has published, without citation.
In “The Bedford Researcher,” Mike Palmquist (2015), identifies the consequences regarding work that has been plagiarized, and plagiarism is taken very seriously, because it guards intellectual property, and recognizes academic work has owners, this “protects an author’s time and energy that is invested into creating a document” (p. 127). Plagiarism can be an accidental or deliberate use of someone’s else’s ideas, thoughts, writings, and evidence without giving credit to the source(Palmquist, 2015, p. 127).
King Lear, a tragedy by William Shakespeare, is about the delegation of power from the old generation to the young, new generation. Furthermore, the play demonstrates problems that can arise from a transfer made too early, from one generation to the next. A Thousand Acres is a modern retelling of King Lear, that is similar to King Lear, but it is not an exact word for word copy. The overall plot has been retained from King Lear, but some of the minor details have been changed to provide an intriguing new take on the same story. One such change is the fact the story goes from a third person view in King Lear, mostly following King Lear, to a first person narrative from the perspective of Ginny in A Thousand Acres. Ginny is the modern day version for Goneril’s character. King Lear and A Thousand Acres may take place in two different time periods; they both offer comments on the status of women, family relationships, and the natural order of things. The two time periods may be different, one modern day and the other set in the past, however the ideas presented are not that different on a whole. Both works presented share the same common thematic and universal elements throughout.
In Chapter 4 of a book titled Escape from Freedom, the famous American psychologist Erich Fromm wrote that "Greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction" (Fromm 98). Fromm realized that avarice is one of the most powerful emotions that a person can feel, but, by its very nature, is an emotion or driving force that can never be satisfied. For, once someone obtains a certain goal, that person is not satisfied and continues to strive for more and more until that quest leads to their ultimate destruction. For this reason, authors have embraced the idea of greed in the creation of hundreds of characters in thousands
King Lear meets all the requirements of a tragedy as defined by Andrew Cecil Bradley. Bradley states that a Shakespearean tragedy has to be the story of the hero and there is exceptional suffering and calamity slowly being worn in. Also, the current time must be contrasted to happier times. The play also depicts the troubled parts in the hero’s life and eventually he dies instantaneously because of the suffering and calamity. There is the feeling of fear in the play as well, that makes men see how blind they are not knowing when fortune or something else would be on them. The hero must be of a high status on the chain and the hero must also possess a tragic flaw that initiates the tragedy.
In the beginning of King Lear, I immediately saw how King Lear wants his three daughters to express their love for him. I believe that this could illustrate King Lear’s fear of growing old and losing importance. The first two daughters, Goneril and Regan, seem to flatter their father with their expression of love for him. It is obvious to me that Goneril and Regan do not actually love their father at all. In contrast, Cordelia, the youngest daughter, gives an honest expression of love when she says, “Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave my heart into my mouth. I love thy majesty according to my bond; no more nor less” (pg. 1257). In return, King Lear believes that Cordelia isn’t truly expressing love since it is not in the form of flattery. This
Although King Lear by Shakespeare and Candide by Voltaire are very different on the outside they share internal values. King Lear is a play written by William Shakespeare, who was an English poet and playwright who was widely regards as the greatest writer in the English language and the world pre-eminent dramatist (Shakespear, 1998). Candide by Voltaire is a satire, Voltaire was born Francois-Marie Arouet, he use his satirizing style of writing to make fun of the Powerful Frenchmen of his time (voltaire, 1991). The internal values of both books connect them with the Human Condition of man, His love of family in King Lear, with his
A long time ago there was a king named King Lear he gave away his kingdom to his 2
During the time that Shakespeare was writing King Lear in 1606, there were events in London which were cause of much concern. The gunpowder plot of 1605 was a failed assassination attempt against King James I of England. It was lead by a group of catholics who were trying to stage a coup. The chaos in England of the time, directly parallels the chaos in the play King Lear. The central theme of the play King Lear by William Shakespeare is the lack of truth and virtue in the kingdom.
Don’t Turn a Blind Eye Madness, mayhem, and foolishness all surround the tragedy of Shakespeare's King Lear. In this tragedy there are many different symbols. Lear made some fatal mistakes when he divided his kingdom. His three worst mistakes are when he demands praise from his daughters, when he banished his most trusted advisors from the kingdom, and when he allowed Cordelia’s truthfulness to drive him to madness. Shakespeare’s King Lear, a tragedy of an antihero, uses strong literary elements such as foreshadowing and symbolism to create a protagonist that is seemingly strong yet surprisingly weak and foolish in his actions and decisions.
Death is the common factor of every person’s life. Even literary characters die. By killing off characters, there is some sort of resolution, because there is little to no possible way for a story to continue. Also, with the deaths of several characters in a story, it can bring a sense of justice and retribution for the actions the characters committed throughout. The play, King Lear, ends with the deaths of several characters. At the end of Shakespeare’s King Lear, the deaths of the central characters prove pivotal by helping to provide two of the central themes, justice and retribution, and helps to develop a tragic hero. These two themes will not be shown, if there are no characters that die, or if different characters die.
Tragedy is all around us; it is part of life as we know it. Whether it is in the news, your life, or in literature, it is everywhere. King Lear, by William Shakespeare, tells a story of great tragedy experienced by a tragic hero and those close to him. By definition, a tragic hero is a literary character who makes an error in judgement that inevitably leads to his/her destruction. In King Lear, the tragic hero, King Lear, has a lapse in judgement and makes a decision that he will later come to regret and will greatly affect his fate and that of the other characters in the play.
Within Shakespeare's plays, and literature in general, madness has been portrayed in very different ways. For some, madness is a key - unlocking the door of a trapped mind, and allowing the sufferer to be truly themselves. For others, madness locks the door, entrapping the victim within their own mind, and causing them intense pain, mentally, and in some cases, physically.
The most prevailing images in King Lear are the images (metaphoric and actual) of nature. The concept of nature seems to consume the dialogue, monologues, and setting.
In books and in life older people are usually seen as wise and so this has become a stereotype. Older leaders are usually shown to be strong and always do the right thing because there wiser than their younger counterparts. This stereotype has become a little overused and so when you see a piece that goes against that norm, it becomes very interesting. In William Shakespeare’s King Lear the theme of sanity and corruption is developed through the motif of wisdom and age to illustrate the idea that older people are not always wiser than younger people. This play flips the idea of wisdom in relation to age on its head, which makes the plot all the more interesting.
King Lear is a tragedy written by the great William Shakespeare that deals with the King of Britain and his troubles. Madness breaks out when King Lear announces that he will give up being King and divide the kingdom he once ruled between his three daughters. King Lear’s daughters are Cordelia, Goneril and Regan and before leaving the thrown the King decided to give each of them portions of the kingdom. However, King Lear wasn’t going to just split up the kingdom evenly between them, Lear wanted to see which one loved him the most and that was his way of finding out which daughter got the portion they deserved. When Lear asked each daughter how much they loved him, the oldest daughter, Goneril, and the middle daughter, Regan, both flattered him with lies saying that they love him as much as you can love and the youngest daughter, Cordelia, claims she loves him as much as one should love their father. Lear then grows furious with Cordelia and disowns her as his