The Political Season Of America

Terrorism, has as of yesterday, just stuck New York with a bombing and Minnesota with a stabbing spree that injured more than 30 people combined. ISIS is claiming responsibility for both of these attacks although it is unclear at this time whether or not they were telling the truth. It does not matter to ISIS if they committed the attack or not as long as they get credit for it. They need to stay active to keep up their fear to influence their soldiers and future recruits so they can look powerful. This means that for America and its citizens they are under constant threat of random attack. Applying symbolic interactionism, it is clear that terrorism is a learned behavior. Groups of terrorists are coming together to spread their label and promote

The use of terrorism started in 1795 relating to the reign of terror leaded by the French Government. The reason people become terrorist is because they see it as their only choice or is a sign for defending their religion. “The personal pathway model suggests that terrorists came from a selected, at risk population, who have suffered from early damage to their self-esteem,” (psychologist Eric D. Shaw). This explains how young adults are becoming terrorist to find themselves, also because they are not happy with who they are. Terrorist technology has changed over the course.

Terrorism has had a profound affect on the world, as it has inspired fear and despair in the hearts of millions of people. Specifically in the United States, where in certain circumstances U.S. citizens will carry out acts of terror to further their own cause. Domestic terrorism has taken roots in many aspects of society through certain ideological groups, radicalization through media, and by acts of terror that cause immense civil unrest.

The 2016 Presidential election forces American voters to pick between the lesser of two evils. With the future of the country at stake, there must be numerous hours invested into researching the best candidate to potentially run the country for the next eight years. Each presidency term shapes the past and future whether it be good or bad. This election will be no different. Donald Trump’s views including lowering corporate taxes to have economic growth, as well as, people on the terror watch list should not be allowed to buy guns, and the repealing of Obamacare to replace it with Health Savings Accounts give Americans sufficient reasoning to elect him for the next president.

With the American general election cycle in full swing, one of the fundamental issues in play is the role of government. What is the place of Government? What should elected officials be doing? Do they simply protect personal liberties, or do they also establish safeguards and guidelines for various economic activities? Ask any two people and you’ll likely receive two different answers, so nuanced and complex is the issue. Policy can give incentives to business to act a certain way both domestically and abroad. Tax incentives in one region may cause a corporate to relocate (this happened to one of my favorite guitar manufacturers recently, as they moved production from Canada to California!). A central bank’s tweak in monetary policy to shift the cost of lending could ultimately move interest rates for consumers looking to take out mortgages or automobile loans. As we witnessed in 2008, the housing market is of international concern and a large central bank wields enormous power. While we like to call the Western economy a “free market,” there exists a multitude of government policies that impact the freedoms and movements of the economy, for better or for worse. I will present two specific examples of government economic intervention for your consideration, one that has helps economic activity and another that hurts it.

The purpose of this paper is to annotate four sources that I will analyze for my final research paper. These sources focus on the following items: (a) Comparing Muslim converts and non-converts in the United States, (b) the psychology of radicalization, (c) the risk of radicalization and terrorism, and (d) how we can combat homegrown radicalization and terrorism. By analyzing these sources, I will be able to develop in-depth reasoning on this topic and complete the research paper.

Mr. Trump uses Americans’ fear and anguish towards terrorism in his election campaign taking advantages of the current worldwide volatile situation.

Terrorism is a frightening reality that all people in today’s world must face. While some areas of the world are facing terrorism more than others nearly are regions and all people are facing the violence and devastating effects of terrorism in one form or another.

“Stairs narrow toward the top. It becomes harder to turn back with each step” (Kershaw, 2010). As said before, there is not a “cookie cutter” definition of what creates a terrorist. One thing is very evident, the radicalization process of an individual is complex, diverse, and is often comprised of idiosyncratic characteristics.

In November 2000 American citizens watched one of the most cinematic reality moments unravel. The entire world tuned into major new media stations like CNN, or Fox News for the winner of the 2000 Presidential election. Every news outlet called Florida to Gore and then to Bush, but the margin was only 0.5% difference with George Bush seeming to take a very important edge over Former Vice-President Al Gore. This event lead to a very conspiracy based recount. Eventually leading America to Former President George W Bush. But really who won the true American vote. Al Gore was leading but George Bush won Triumph even though Bush was missing 534,895 of the American voters (Cauchon & Drinkard, 2001). The popular vote which is the vote of the people was disregarded, and the Electoral College votes allowed for a shameful stab at the democracy of America. America the Election of the face of America which is president and is decided by a complete fault in American Democracy. We need to change the law, and push America’s democracy to allowing the popular vote to be the method of choosing president. My defense of this is running deep, and pure because the Electoral College has some serious faults. This method has impacted 4 elections, and brought someone who didn’t win the vote of the people to secure the residence at Pennsylvania Ave (White House). Followed by this it’s hypocritical method compared to the American constitution. Yes, there are some con to the popular vote which can be

Christmas is fast approaching, and is often referred to as the most wonderful time of the year. The holiday season is a time of love and giving, but every four years there’s an anomaly that occurs, and I’m talking about Campaign Season, aka the worst time of the year. Absolutely nothing can bring a family dinner to an abrupt halt like the discussion of politics. Family members take up arms, form alliances, and then proceed to hash it out Gangs of New York style. Have fun explaining to your boss that you have to miss work due to you knee caps being blown off by your ultra conservative uncle for having the audacity to mention gun control reform. Do family discussions of politics actually escalate to bloody brawls in the streets? Perhaps not

The recruiting of an American jihad radical begins by focusing on a certain person with either a socio, economic or political dissatisfaction that is typically shared with a personal problem of some sort. Just as most young people are searching for the answer to life, successful recruitment occurs because of ignorance or minimum exposure to mainstream religions. “Most of the terrorists have some occupational skills. Three-fourths are either professional (physicians, lawyers, architects, engineers, or teachers) or semi-professionals (businessmen, craftsmen, or computer specialists). They are solidly anchored in family responsibilities. Three-fourths are married and the majorities have children” (Sageman). It seems that the ties to terrorism

There has also been long time assumption among professionals and average citizens that terrorists are ‘mentally ill’ individuals. However, there is yet again no evidence that supports that theory. As a matter of fact, there is countless examples in history that counters that said theory of being ‘mentally ill’ and this article provides those examples; as well as, providing the avenue in which an individual can and has been radicalized. Moreover, this article articulates and lays out a method in which could be used to counter the radicalization

Terrorism is used around the world to create fear and influence the public on political views (Siegel, 489). There are four views of terrorism including the psychological view, socialization view, ideological view, and the alienation view. A religious terrorist would most likely fit under the ideological view. In this view the terrorist feels the need to change a wrong opinion and believes that, because they are sacrificing themselves for something they believe so strongly in, it justifies the damage and harm done to innocent people (Siegel, 490). They use terror to create fear in anyone who opposes them and attract followers to their religion. In short, terrorism is widely used for political

Terrorism, which has been around for as long as people can remember, has been on the rise for the past ten years. Terrorists usually use murdering, kidnapping, hi-jacking and bombings to achieve their political purpose. For instance, according to Wikipedia.com (2006), in 1985 816 deaths, then in 2003, more than 1,000 people died by terorist acts around the world. In recent years, terrorism seems to be at a new height and attacks are much more violent than in the past. Unfortunately, in spite of many anti-terror campaigns, projects and organizations are being created for prevention (to prevent) terrorism, the number of terrorists only is increasing. These days terrorism is all over the world.