The Potter Box has a four different dimensions of moral analysis that can aid us where the most misunderstandings occur. The first is to define all the things that are arising in certain situation. The second is to define all the values in a situation. The third dimension is to apply all ethical reasonings to the situation or the fact. The fourth dimension is to decide where the decisions maker loyalty is. Regarding The Fast Food dilemma is about the manager who sees that his employees/friends stealing food from the restaurant. Restaurant manager knows that his friends are going through some tough moments in their life. Ultimately, he has to decide where his loyalty lies; with his friends or with the restaurant that he is working for. Using
This paper is going to discuss Ethics and Ethical Theories. It will include an introduction to ethical theories, virtue ethics, and care ethics. There will be sections discussing absolutism versus relativism, consequentialism versus deontological ethics, and lastly, free will versus determinism. It will also include a discussion about the study of morality and identify which of the approaches (Scientific, Philosophical, or Theological/Religious) are closest to my own personal beliefs. There will be a discussion regarding the three sources of ethics
The last step in making a moral decision is simply making the decision. How one arranges the issues and arrives at this decision depends on one's particular set of values and cultural perspectives, but regardless the values and cultural perspectives of the decision maker, the rights and duties remain the same for any situation. One must learn to look for and identify the appropriate deontological factors. Once these factors are identified, one may use his/her own values in order to determine which factors are the most important. By applying these unique values, one is able to develop the final decision.
As time goes by, ethical and moral issues have been brought up for long periods of time and these issues are recently becoming the rising problem to be discussed in society, business area and daily life. Most of people generally understand that the general meaning of ethics equals to the meaning of moral. However, moral is basically a matter of individual conscience without forcibleness, but ethics are related to social system with forcibleness. The academic definition of ethics is described as a stem of philosophy which raises moral questions and is demonstrated what is the main characteristic of morality and the way in which moral standards are decided (Gray & Webb, 2010).
Actions and inactions all have moral implications; they are either right or wrong depending on the individual and what s/he believes or feels is right or wrong. Each person’s conduct can and does have implications and ramifications. For every action there is an equal and/or opposite reaction not only for the average person but also for professionals; especially in the area of law enforcement, criminal justice, and criminal procedure. Just discussed is known as moral philosophy.
Now, let's see how learning about the Four Ethical Lenses and a simple method for decision-making can help you resolve a typical ethical dilemma. Ready?
as watchdogs over public affairs and government. Seek to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in the open, and that public records are open to all.” Laurens was only doing her job by printing the article. (2.)If I look at the situation in black and white and forget what I know about ethics, I do agree with the mayor. Technically she did provide fair coverage of both sides, she asked the councilman for a responds regarding the press conference, which he refused only providing a few words. In Laurens’s article she even printed what he briefly said involving the controversy. To avoid this issue Laurens should have relied on the Potter Box, which is an ethical decision-making model broken up into four steps. Before even writing the article
In Ruggiero’s book, Thinking Critically about Ethical Issues, he explains that there are three basic criteria for making ethical decision and aiding in moral actions. A moral action is, “one that demonstrates respect for persons by honoring the relevant obligations and ideals and by producing favorable consequences.” (Ruggiero, 81) The three basic criteria are obligations, the moral ideals and consequences. Ruggiero believes that when making a decision, one should first understand the details. Second, one needs to understand the obligations, the moral ideal and the consequences of his or her action. We will furthermore go into each criterion
Potter box is a four step process: 1.) Understanding the facts 2.) Outlining the values inherent in the decision 3.) Applying relevant philosophical principles 4.) Articulating loyalties. When looking from a public relations professionals stand point and having to come out with a news release. Using potter box would be a way to ethical judge a story to be released or not. First, I would start with the facts getting the full story and ethically thinking what needs to be printed. Second, loyalties because in PR truth to you and your jobs ethical values are your main concerns. Third, value because it’s about being truthful and thinking about keeping my job, telling the full detailed truth, and if needed invading privacy of the person
For a given ethical dilemma, there is usually a dominant pair. Frequently, more than one must be considered, and sometimes all four. But, as Kidder
This paper will compare the usefulness of character-based and consequence-based approaches in making moral decisions. In a character-based approach, the consideration of the moral agent is central in making decisions, and actions are made in order to reflect and strengthen good character. In a consequence-based approach, the consideration of the outcome is central in making moral decisions, and actions are judged based on the outcome. Usefulness will be defined in terms of three aspects: consistency, convenience and assurance, with assurance being defined as the confidence that the decision made is correct. Through the comparison of the two approaches, it becomes clear that a character-based approach is more useful in making a decision.
Ethics and virtue have been a very contentious issue facing society for centuries. Many argue over the merits of various theories, each with its own philosophies and assumptions. It is this argument that has given rise to many popular and followed theories of ethics and virtues. The theories discussed primarily in this document include the virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological theory. Each is very distinct to the others in regards to its principles and assumptions regarding human behavior. Each however, has merit in regards to question of ethics and virtue, and how it should subsequently be valued.
There are a variety of different ethical systems that have developed of the course of millennia. However, even though the subject has been covered so thoroughly, it is still heavily debated. The varieties of ethical systems that are in existence look at various ethical problems from different perspectives and can be applied differently in different circumstances. Because of the subjective aspects to applying ethics, they can be as much an art as they are a science. Ethics are something that must be practiced and really cannot be perfected. In this way, studying ethics is a continual process that does not really stop. This paper will argue that ethics are the most important subject that an individual can pursue.
In the article Ethical foundations and perspectives by C.G. Christians, the Potter Box method of making ethical decisions as designed by Dr. Potter’s suggests that there are “explicit steps and by using the model components to every ethical dilemma; facts, values, ethics/principles, loyalties a person can more clearly see all sides before making the decision and action plans” (Christians, 2013, p.3).
These theories are used to evaluate ethical dilemmas that we face on our day to day life,
Individual factors helps to understand the reason for some people perceive specific action to be unethical whiles others do not. However, the decision-making cannot simply be explained in terms of these individual factors, because after all several people seems to have ‘multiple ethical selves’ (Trevino and Nelson 2007:180) – that is, they make different decisions in different situations. Situational factors accepted to be the most important.