In one year, people in the United States consume 1 billion chickens, 150 million cattle, pigs and sheep annually. Compared to this, the total combined amount of animals used for research is only 26 million, with 95% the animals being rodents, birds and fish. This would account to nearly 340 chickens consumed per animal used in research (US Statistics, 2016). Consequently, even with this knowledge, people continue to ignore facts and statistics; calling this practice unethical or even inhumane. This is due the rise of social media and organizations such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), whose tactics rely more on emotional appeal than facts and logic, going so far as to twist and manipulate and the information given until it suits their ideals. Because of this, the amount of myths and misleading information spread around has increased over these past years. What this community fails to mention is the benefits and misconceptions of animal testing, as well as the vital part that it plays in the field of medicine and veterinary science. All of these (based on facts and statistics) are why animal testing for research purposes should be allowed to continue.
When imagining a scientist doing tests on animals; many often see a shady, psychopathic maniac holding a scalpel threateningly over a innocent looking animal. In reality, this is never the case; with one neurologist stating: “ Those I know are compassionate, humane people who carry out their work with
Most would agree that they would not want to have their beloved pets subjected to any kind of medical research, especially if it causes them pain. Unfortunately, the same kind of empathy seems to be lacking when considering animals commonly used in medical research, such as rats, mice, or birds. However, whether a lab animal, or a pet, the ethics remain the same, and should be considered by most to be unethical. While the Animal Welfare Act has significantly reduced the suffering of animals in medical research, the suffering still exists. Furthermore, the
According to the National Institutes of Health, animal testing has been around since the days of philosopher Aristotle. According to ProCon.org, there are an estimated 26 million animals used for scientific and commercial testing in the U.S. alone. Animal testing has brought many good things to the medical world, such as the treatment various disease. Also, the animal is being tested by many cosmetics companies. On the other hand, organizations like PETA- People of Ethical Treatment of Animals have fought against the medical testing of animals. There are pros and cons that come with the usage of animals in the biomedical and cosmetic testing, and each side needs should be carefully examined before deciding one way or another.
In 2014 a group organization called People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) noted that more than 100 million animals are harmed or killed during animal testing. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals are being used for medical testing, but are not being cared for before, during, or after testing. Animals and humans are very similar, in that we have the same organ system which performs the same tasks in a similar fashion. Even though animals and humans share comparable DNA, we fail to see the similarities in physical and emotional pain that animals endure during testing. Subjecting even one animal to that type of cruelty, all in the name of science is one too many.
Over one hundred million animals every year die from animal testing, in the medical and cosmetic fields alone (“Experiments on Animals: Overview”). Animal testing is as big of a problem today as it has been in the past. Most people do not agree with animal testing today but years ago it was one of the only ways of testing. It was considered, if not the only, effective and efficient ways of testing a product’s toxicity. To date, animal testing is not warranted because of the development of new technology and past discoveries. Many organizations and brands publicly oppose animal testing. The companies that stand against animal testing are broad and diverse, ranging from medical to cosmetic testing, advocating that at its core, this issue is
Over one hundred million animals every year die from animal testing, in the medical and cosmetic fields alone (“Experiments on Animals: Overview”). Animal testing is as big of a problem today as it has been in the past. Most people do not agree with animal testing today but years ago it was one of the only ways of testing. It was considered, if not the only, effective and efficient ways of testing a product’s toxicity. To date, animal testing is not warranted because of the development of new technology and past discoveries. Many organizations and brands publicly oppose animal testing. The companies that stand against animal testing are broad and diverse, ranging from medical to cosmetic testing, advocating that at its core, this issue is
A controversial and often debated topic that has been circulating for years now is the use of animals in scientific research. Different opinions can be given on this case. Some people think animal testing isn’t bad, while others oppose it, claiming it’s not ethical and it should stop. The debate has been going on for a while, but I think it will be coming to an end soon as in my opinion, animal testing is a cruel method of research that shouldn’t be used by anyone for any reason. This is evident and supported by many facts and reasons.
First and foremost, the inaccuracy of animal testing has caused such tragedies in human lives. The animal testing will give the scientist ideas of what may happen, but nothing is secured or accurate. As a matter of fact, ninety-six percent of affirmative tested animal results fail with humans (“Test Drugs With Technology”). For instance, in the 1950s a sleeping pill thalidomide was tested on rats. The drug passed every exam for the thalidomide, but when it was released to the public, it caused ten thousand babies to be born with astringent deformities (“Thalidomide”). Also, a drug, Vioxx, was tested on mice and showed to have protection for the heart. Tragically, when it was released, it caused more than 27,000 cardiac deaths (“Test Drugs
Have you ever wondered how it would feel to be forced to do things against your will? Every year more than 100 million animals suffer each year. They are forced to eat, get physically hurt, and overall being traumatized. Despite animals not being exactly like humans, they still feel the same pain and emotions as us. Animals should not be used in medical testing or product testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane with animals being forced to do things they wouldn't want to do.
The use of animals in experiments at leading federally-funded labs has increased nearly seventy three percent in the past fifteen years, according to a new study conducted by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) (Casey). Animal testing helps to produce many vaccines and other drugs, such as penicillin, saving many human lives . On the other hand, animal testing causes lots of pain and kills a large amount of animals used during the researches that many people oppose this practice. In this case labs that use mice, rats, birds, reptiles and amphibians are exempted from the minimal protections under the Animal Welfare Act. Although some may think using animals as test subjects is beneficial to humans, in fact, it is cruel to the animals and there are other alternatives.
Over 100 million animals are killed in experiments in the U.S. alone each year, according Laboratory Animal Resource Center at UC San Francisco. At the University of Missouri a study was done were they intentionally damaged the corneas of the dogs and given a topical acid treatment that was supposed to heal the eye, it did not, and the beagles were eventually put to death. Because of the cruel nature of animal testing, there should be an alternative.
“If you can call it “medical research”, you can get away with murder.” This quote, advertised by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), presents truth about the way animals are treated today. Each year, over 25 million animals are tested on for scientific or commercial purposes. Animals have been a part of human research and advancement since before 500 BC. but the past 150 years or so, the testing has become more like legal torture and less like medical research. I strongly believe that scientific and commercial testing on animals needs to stop because it violates the basic rights that animals have, it can have misleading results, and it is cruel and inhumane.
The use of living, breathing animals in labs for research and product testing has been a topic of great controversy for years. Over 100 million animals are killed in labs for research and experimentation purposes each year in the U.S. alone, according to PETA’s article, “Experiments on Animals: Overview”. Unfortunately, no matter how a person feels about animals, it doesn’t change the fact that millions of their innocent lives are being taken advantage of every year. There are a few different viewpoints people have about animals, as some see them as loving pets and companions, while others see them as a logical method for conducting experiments to advance research. Unfortunately, no matter how a person feels about animals, it doesn’t change the fact that millions of their innocent lives are being taken advantage of every year. Animal experimentation for scientific or commercial use is a practice that needs to be eradicated for its unnecessary and unethical treatment of animal subjects.
Animal testing has been the go-to method for medical and scientific experiments for some centuries now and has its fair share of success in the past. However, its time has come to and it needs to be replaced with other methods. Animal testing is unprecedentedly brutal and inhumane, results from animal testing won’t always apply to humans, and modern technology has given alternative methods to torturing.
physiologically; Humans share 95% of our DNA with mice ( “BBC News”). With the help of
In 2017 alone, over one hundred animals died due to animal testing. 3.4 million of those animals were common household pets. If people go to jail for animal neglect and abuse, then why is animal testing permitted? This is a debatable topic because some people believe animal testing is acceptable for science and medicine. It is argued that animal testing is necessary for products even though pet possessed animals are victims tortured, causes human health issues from faulty results, and better alternatives have been show cased.