The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

It is not often that one sees the gruesome ways of animal experimentation in person. In short, it is the use of non-human animals in labs to find variables that affect the behavior of the human biological system (Google). Many people-like the PETA organization or the Humane Society-oppose these practices, but even this opposition is not enough to stop testing from happening for things such as cosmetics testing, chimpanzee experimentation, and genetically engineered farm animals. Although some of the testing produces positive results-such as a drug working-it is at the expense of millions of tortured animals; therefore, a simple solution would be to prohibit the use of animals in research.

Although animal testing in the United States is regulated by the AWA, this act does not supervise experiments on animals; thus, many animals are abused. While acting as

Although, the Animal Welfare Act has not succeeded in preventing horrific cases of animal abuse in research laboratories. The animal welfare law is the only Federal law in the United States that regulates the treatment of animals in research, exhibition, transport, and by dealers. An article from ProCon.org states, “The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) found 338 possible violations of the Animal Welfare Act at the federally funded New Iberia Research Center (NIRC) in Louisiana.” Testing medical treatments on animals puts the animals in danger for results that are not

Animals endure so much pain and suffering when being tested on. In some cases, animal testing can be deadly or lead to serious side effects that will forever stick with the animal that was tested on. Animals hardly ever, to never benefit from testing. In research and testing, animals are subjected to experiments that can include everything from testing new drugs to infecting with diseases, poisoning for toxicity testing, burning skin, causing brain damage, implanting electrodes into the brain, maiming, blinding, and other painful and invasive procedures (NEAVS). It can include protocols that cause severe suffering. Also, can’t forget about the restricted living conditions where animals are forced to live in an unhealthy habitat out of their own element during the testing period. Animals in labs suffer not only pain from protocols, but also severe stress from day-to-day laboratory life. They spend their lives in barren cages, unable to make choices or express natural behaviors. Most never experience fresh air or sunshine, only bars and concrete. Although most think that the Animal Welfare Act protects animals from abuse, it is a common misconception that the AWA protects animals against abuse and harm in the laboratory or in other areas of commerce. This is not true. According to the National Anti-Vivisection Society the AWA regulates the use of animals in research and outlines standards for their care, it does not protect

They experience ongoing mental and physical suffering from the endless boredom, confinement, fear, and emotional stress of daily laboratory life. Add to this the fear and agony of a procedure, and only then can we start to understand the desperation and pain in which they live, every day—and for most, for their entire lives. The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is the only federal law that provides even minimal protection for animals in laboratories. (The federal Public Health Service's (PHS) Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals covers animals in NIH-funded research, but the PHS does not conduct inspections itself. Instead, it relies on institutions to inspect their own labs.) However, it specifically excludes rats, mice, and birds bred for research, who constitute 90-95 percent of animals in labs. For the approximately 10 percent of warm-blooded animals in labs who are covered under the AWA, the law covers husbandry only—meaning specific standards for their housing, feeding, and handling, including veterinary care. It does not prohibit any kind of experiment regardless of the amount of pain or distress it might cause. Instead, it requires oversight committees (called Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees, or IACUCs) to review and

Latham reflects upon animal testing laws and groups and goes into detail, clarifying them by giving the reader thorough background information on each. Throughout the article, Latham mentions numerous organizations and laws that are affiliated with the United States concerning animal experimentation, these organizations and laws include, the Animal Welfare Act of 1966, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. Latham does an extremely well job in discussing similarities and differences extensively between the history and the making of animal testing

The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is the only federal law that gives protection to warm -blooded animals in research laboratories. Under this law, it is the researchers’ job to make sure that they provide these animals pain relievers, provide them with the best veterinary care, housing, and food. This law only protects ten percent of the lab animals. The rest of the ninety percent of animals in labs aren’t protected: rats, mice and birds. This means legally the researchers do not have to provide these unprotected lab animals with decent care at all. Researchers can choose to treat these unprotected animals however they want and with as many rats, mice and birds as they please. Knowing how unfair the Welfare Act is towards the many lab animals it should be protecting, the voters should inform and show concern to their legislators in order to stop the mistreatment of these animals. The Animal Welfare Act should protect all animals being tested in research laboratories.

Every year, more than 100 million animals are poisoned, crippled, burned, or abused in United States labs alone. The Animal Welfare Act, or AWA, was passed in 1966 and is the only federal law in the U.S. today that regulates animal treatment in research. That being said, the AWA is not heavily enforced. Additional, the regulations it includes are extremely minimal and do not protect any type of reptiles, amphibians, rats, mice, or birds, meaning that more than ninety percent of the animals being tested on are still submitted to painful and torturous tests. These tests often result in a lifetime of pain and damage because after the tests, the animals are placed back in their cages without any medical treatment and are often used in further

“Animals undergoing testing can be subjected to torture and suffering” (Humanity, 2017, p. 1). Some animals may be cured of their ailments and diseases, but not all. In some cases, the animal dies do to the treatment. Humane treatment of the animals is a valid concern, so the use of them in experiments has been greatly regulated. “This has led to the 3Rs campaign, which advocates the search (1) for the replacement of animals with non-living models; (2) reduction in the use of animals; and (3) refinement of animal use products” (Hajar, 2011, p. 1). The Animal Welfare Act was signed to protect certain animals from cruel treatment, but the animals chosen for testing aren’t covered by this act. Many people believe that animal testing is unethical since animals are

The Animal Welfare Act is designed to provide a minimum standard of care for animals in experimental laboratories. The minimum standards of care that must be provided for

There are currently fifteen federal agencies that back animal testing for regulatory purposes, each playing a key role in the management of safety for animals (“Lab Animal Welfare”,2014). Alongside these agencies are many federal level acts, such as the Animal Welfare Act, which was established in 1966 and has been undergoing a variety of amendments since. Subsequently, the Health Research Extension Act of 1985 was put in place and incorporated many provisions that comprised a health service policy pertaining to the use of laboratory and animals and human care. Amidst these acts are a multitude of laws, regulations and procedures in which researchers are required to abide by (“How do Laws and Regulations”,

Today, more than six million animals are used for research and testing around the world (Panahi). Animal testing has been around for a long time. In 1966, the Animal Welfare Act was authorized to prevent the buying or selling of animals for research purposes. It applies to animal carriers, handlers, dealers, breeders, and exhibitors in addition to research laboratories (Ballinger). It also sets minimum standards of which the experimenter has to provide for the animal. These standards include housing, sanitation, food, water, veterinary care, and protection from weather extremes (Ballinger). This act provides the basic protection for some animals but more than 90 percent of animals used in research today are excluded from

Animal research is regulated by the Animal Welfare Act(AWA). The Animal Welfare Act protects animals against mistreatment during experimentation and living in labs. The act protects against mistreatment of animals by enforcing the following rules: minimum housing standards for research animals (enclosure size, temperature, access to clean food and water, and others), all proposals to use animals for research must be approved by an institutional animal care and use committee set up by

Today laws regulating the use of animals in laboratory experiments protect animals. These laws include the Animal Welfare Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and the FD&C Act (Animal Rights: Timeline). Technology combined with people’s concern for the welfare of animals has led to changes in how modern laboratories conduct research.

Every year, 26 million animals are used in the United States for scientific and commercial testing (ProCon.org). The purpose of animal testing is to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medication, check safety of products, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. People have been experimenting with animals since at least 500 BC. Animal testing is regulated by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which was passed in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985. The AWA excludes birds, rats, and mice bred for research, cold-blooded animals, and farm animals used for food and other purposes (animalresearch.thehastingscenter.org). Animal testing is a controversial subject that looks whether or not