The Pros And Cons Of Climate Change

In the beginning, the writers present the process of the research conducted by the MIT researchers and conclusions that showed how even a low carbon tax would be effective at lowering carbon emissions. The writers continue the article by pointing out the effects of different policies, relating to the revenue created from a carbon tax, on corporations and lower income households. Finally, the writers draw attention to the fact that this carbon tax will greatly influence the effects of global warming. This article was written for Americans and is a solution that is perfect for the political spectrum of any government institution within the United States. The article addresses ways that a carbon tax can be used to please both liberals and conservatives. Though the writers did not conduct their own research, they did cite a study conducted by university researchers and a government organization and use interviews with key researchers in the study. Though this article cites only one research study, the idea of a carbon tax is still a viable solution and it will be used in my research to show that there is a viable solution to the problem of air

Every human activity has a particular effect on objects surrounding his or her environment, be it physical, mental, or social. But notably, the most evident might be the effect of human activity on global warming. Global warming is quickly becoming a major topic of concern worldwide, and has been stirring up controversy everywhere with its adverse effects seen all over the world. It causes rise of the temperature, leading to – among other things - melting of the polar ice and glaciers, increase in sea level, and extreme weather events. Its effects can also be felt in the form of natural disasters like drought, floods, and tornadoes. Of recent,

Carbon taxing coal-based products, in a revenue-neutral way, will help discourage overuse of fossil fuels. The United States needs to reduce carbon emissions in order to avoid the costs that pollution and climate change inflict on the general economy and individuals. Carbon, unlike other commodities exchanged and consumed in the free market, bears unique costs to the general economy that its market price does not encompass. The pollution we create when we consume carbon contaminates our air, raises temperatures, and makes severe weather events more frequent. A carbon tax is an economic mechanism that forces actors in a free market to come face-to-face with the social cost of

Climate change has become a major issue in global environmental politics as it has been shown to have a correlation with issues such as deforestation, biodiversity loss, and desertification. As Chapter 45 states “The 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) found consensus in the scientific community that greenhouse gas emissions have significantly increased because of human activity and, further, that the modest temperature increases we have already experienced are “very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.” Due to this report awareness was brought to almost everyone of how serious human activity was to the global climate. In 2009, it was declared that “If global warming is to be limited to a maximum of two degrees C. above preindustrial values, global emissions need to peak between 2015 and 2020 and then decline rapidly”. To me this sounds foreboding and it is something that deserves our full attention immediately. To try and get a better understanding of how serious climate change is, I’m going to try and interpret chapter 45 which deals on climate change through 5 different paradigms of International Relations.

Tremendous amounts of carbon dioxide are released into the atmosphere every day and the consequence is the destabilization of Earth’s climate and damage to existing and endangered ecosystems. In order to avoid these ramifications, carbon emissions must be reduced. Industrial nations like the United States rely heavily on the burning of billions of tons of fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and natural gas, as their primary source of energy generation. Unfortunately, this has led to the United States being one of the top leaders in carbon emissions in the world along with India and China (Woodard, 2007, pg. 27). A proposed solution that has already been implemented in several nations is the carbon tax (CO2 tax), which puts a price on and taxes the carbon dioxide emitted from the burning of fossil fuels and makes polluters pay the price for the emission of their negative externalities into the environment. As fuel follows through with the combustion process, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere where it remains. The carbon dioxide traps the heat in the Earth’s atmosphere leading to a rise in global warming and climate change (Carbon Tax Center, 2016a, What’s a Carbon Tax section, para. 2). A carbon tax can quickly and easily be implemented by the United States federal government and has the potential to conserve the environment by reducing carbon emissions,

Climate change conspirators/deniers is a problem to today’s population. Climate change is defined as any irregularities in earth’s weather (NASA, 2017). Individuals who deny the scientific facts that are climate change is an interesting subset of the population. Climate change conspiracy theories typically challenge the scientific proof and ultimately claim that climate change is a hoax. The reasons these individuals give vary. For one, a major claim is that climate change is natural and not a result of human behaviour/consumption patterns. Another main argument is that the science is not reliable. Despite both, and hundreds of other arguments against climate change being proven wrong, these deniers continue to believe that climate change does not exist. The primary conspiracy theory that will be focused on is the belief that climate change is a sham. Two research questions that would help understand why individuals choose to believe this conspiracy theory are: are there any common demographics among climate change deniers; and, how is this belief perpetuated in the media?

President Trump, will the United States, will be the only government to take an opposing view on Globe warming. According to the CNN reporter, Michael Mann, Syria has offered to join in on the Paris climate agreement. Luckily, a new report released by two credible and major organizations on climate change, the US National Climate Assessment, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Mann reports, “a massive report assembled by hundreds of our nation's best scientists.” is keeping the shot light on the Trump administration.

A recent survey showed that “the top US economists found near unanimity on the optimality of a carbon tax as an instrument for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.” In other word, pricing carbon is one of the most sensible policy prescriptions to reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

Environmentalists believe a reduction in CO₂ will slow down the global warming process and improve our overall health. Global warming is an overall increase in temperature to the earth's atmosphere caused by greenhouse gases, which traps the Earth’s core heat. However, global warming is not a new issue, the rise in temperature was first discovered in the late 1800s. As of 2015, the Earth's atmosphere has risen 2 degrees higher than the average temperature. Temperatures are said to raise another 15 degrees, over the next 100 years. Global warming alters wildlife, weather, heath, and the ocean. Thousands of people are affected every year, Environmentalists want to stop the effects of global warming which can be altered by an increase use renewable

Studies held in Svalbard have shown that the reindeer population has been decreasing it’s body mass. Reindeer born in the 1990’s weighed about 121 pounds, and those born in 2010 weighed about 106 pounds. This issue is a direct result of climate change, which is the expansion of the greenhouse effect, that is being caused by the doings of humans. Climate change indicates warmer winters means more rain. When the rain freezes, it creates a thick layer of ice above their food, which prevents the reindeer from eating, and creating serious competition for other food. The hungry females either aren’t able to give birth or produce babies that are much tinier.

Those in power, who believe climate change is a myth, are dangerous for humankind, the environment, and the future as well. Specifically focusing on Trump, who has been in office for a few days, and those he choose to be in various government positions, together, they have already done more damage than good towards the environment. The decisions Trump, and Scott Pruitt (head of the Environmental Protection Agency) made with freezing the EPA's aid negatively affects poverty-stricken areas, like Flint, Michigan. By making drastic decisions without even considering those in America without clean drinking water, highlights that not only is the environment neglected, but also helpless people. While the denial of climate change is present, environmental racism is at work as well.

The Hamilton Project, CATO Institute, Stanford and Harvard all agree that policymakers should set the price of the carbon tax equal to the social cost of carbon (P=SCC). The Cato institute defines SCC or the social cost of carbon as “the present‐discounted value of the net future external damages from an additional unit of carbon dioxide emissions” (Murphy). This is one of the key concepts that is examined when it comes to economic and/or environmental policy decisions regarding CO2 emissions. This in turn means that a hypothetical carbon tax would be equal to the environmental and social negative externalities that are produced by each additional ton on CO2 emissions (marginal cost). The Hamilton project gives a hypothetical tax scenario of $16 per ton and increasing by 4% per year or so in accordance with the inflation rate. The reason for the incremental increase is because $16 is still far below the Government’s central estimate of $23 and below Canada and British Columbia’s carbon tax policies (“New”). Starting at a lower rate will allow for the gradual assimilation into this new tax policy, if it were implemented.

Everyone is being lied to! Everyone believes in man-made climate change when it’s not even real. I’m here to tell you the truth. These reasons explain how everyone wastes their time and energy worrying about climate change. They waste their money on projects that don’t help, people believe in the politicians that started the lie, and the miners lose their jobs. I’m going to talk to you about climate change.

There are people that do not believe that climate change is occurring. We can analyze why some deny climate change, use specific methods of persuasion, and use social media platforms to spread the word of how humans are impacting our planet. Using specific facts, we can attempt to educate and persuade others to realize just how severe human impact on Earth truly is.

The Earth could die by global warming, if humans don’t make a change of how we treat the environment. Global warming means that the Earth’s temperature is rising, getting warmer, because of the greenhouse effect (Global Warming and Climate Change). The greenhouse effect is when the gases in Earth’s atmosphere trap heat onto Earth and stop it from going to space. The main greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide.Burning fossil fuels is the main reason global warming is increasing. When we burn fossil fuels, we are releasing carbon dioxide. The more gases in the atmosphere means the higher the temperature. The hot temperature is one of the reason of the constant occurring natural disasters and climate change. Global warming is affecting our weather, ocean, food, and health, therefore everyone should help decrease it.