The Pros And Cons Of Gun Violence

This opinion piece from The Washington Post was written by U.S. Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut. Published days after the recent Las Vegas Shooting, Murphy tells of his past experiences with gun violence urging for stronger gun control legislation. He states that the “phenomenon of horrific mass shootings is exclusive to the United States”, so the solution should be able to be solved by Americans. He argues that our response to “regular mass shootings” has been un-American, and how can a country that has solved the greatest problems in the world, not solve a problem that puts our fellow citizens in harm. “…we choose to be an increasingly distant outlier of exceptional violence”, Murphy states.

Two thousand, four hundred fifty-eight: the number of gun-related deaths in 2017 in the United States as of February 28, the 59th day of the year (“Number of Gun Deaths,” n.d.). Twenty of these occurred on the 27th alone. Just hearing the words “gun control” puts many people on edge; the explosive and divisive nature of the issue leads them to tread cautiously whenever the topic arises. Gun violence is a national dilemma that no one wants to exist. This is where the consensus seems to end: few people agree on how to end it. Gun violence has gotten an ever-increasing amount of press over the past few years, leaving it in the forefront of American attention, and many are frustrated that nothing is changing. In order for any progress to be made,

There have been a major increase of deaths by guns in the U.S. The numbers have increased since the late 1900s and has kept on accumulating today. Research has shown that there are many guns owned by people in the U.S than any other country in the world ( ("U.S. Gun Violence: The Story in Graphics"). The government has tried to control the gun violence, however there have been debates about that being wrong and it would take away the citizens of America’s rights. Though, there are still gun violence present; the government revoking the privilege of people owning guns, they would starts rebelling against the government and there would be more gun violence. Still, if the government doesn’t do anything about the issue families are going to flee

Gun violence is a major flaw in our schools and in communities at large. There were 28 people that died in the Sandy Hooks school shooting on December 14, 2012. At the columbine high school shooting on April 20,1999, there were 15 people that were killed. At the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting on February 14,2018, there were 17 students and teachers that had been shot and killed. Since Columbine, there has been 122 deaths from school shootings.

In 2014 of the 42,820 suicides reported that year 21,386 involved a firearm (mel.org). Shootings on campus raise the question of whether properly trained students carrying firearms. The debate over gun control has two sides one is that people should have guns for many reasons like it is the second amendment and to protect themselves. The other side is that people shouldn't have guns because they can't be trusted with them.

The high rates of gun violence and accidents in the United States have long aroused public concern, in view of the strong correlation between gun prevalence, many people believe that the United States must adopt stricter gun control measures to reduce the huge number of firearms across the nation. These people are known as gun control proponents, or advocates. However, many other people do not think so. In their eyes, the serious firearm problems do not result from gun prevalence, and many people would say it is not gun’s problem, people are pushing our society of violence and murder. Consequently, these people, known as gun control opponents, strongly oppose the gun regulations proposed by control advocates. The two sides of the gun

Gun violence has become a big obstacle in America and needs to be interrupted. 36,252-gun correspondent deaths were in the year 2015. There is an article from the Washington Post expressing about gun violence. The article mentions the New York Times took a survey of the citizens of the United States on according to what they think the US should counteract gun violence. People that wanted background checks was 86%, license for guns 78% agreed, and not letting people with violent criminal backgrounds 83% people requested that. In 1991, Democrats and Republicans said people essentially need to get a permit from the police before obtaining a gun. Out of the republicans, 57% want people to attain permits from the police. The fundamental ways to stop gun violence would be a background check, and acquire a state license. People with violent background that have to do with a crimes should not experience having guns, as said in the article. There was a test done in the article, US Public Opinion, showing out of the 50,000 people that took the survey said guns should overall not be in public places. There survey was about the location people should use guns. In some components of the US people can carry guns in public places confiding on where in the public a citizen is transporting the gun. In Newtown, Connecticut there was twenty children and six adults shot at a school. In Aurora, Colorado, James Holmes shot seventy people in one of the movie theaters. In Tucson, Arizona, eighteen people were shot by Jared Loughner. The concept these shooters had in common was they all had a downbeat mental illness. These shooters had

This article stood out to me as the author of this article does not have a strong stance in any of the side regarding gun control. However, it has convincing content of gun control in both side of the argument. I plan to use this article’s points in relation to the cons of gun control, and express it to my audience. Nonetheless, I plan to revoke every appeal the other side of argument holds for gun control.

Gun control regulation is a set of laws and policies designed to regulate the manufacturing, sale, purchase, and use of guns by civilians. Gun control has been a dividing topic, especially over the last decade among Americans. Firearms are a staple of American culture and society. Many Americans own firearms, for recreational purpose in the form of hunting and/or target shooting. Many also own guns as a method of safety and protection in a society characterized by violence. However, we continue to see a trend in mass shootings were guns are too frequently, being used for senseless violence. The mass shootings in Las Vegas and Texas have prompted the country to revive the tireless debate about gun violence and whether we can combat it with gun regulations. The issue specifically stems from the frequency of gun violence in the U.S. The issues of gun violence continue to be fought by both gun rights activist and gun control groups alike both groups lobbying Congress to craft legislation in their respective favors. The debate continues on whether laxer or stricter gun control laws will help protect citizen and limit mass shooting and violent crimes. In my paper, I will show both the pros and the cons of gun control arguing for both opposing views. I will do this using background information as well other supporting facts and evidence. I will conclude my paper with a possible suggestion of solutions to these issues.

Advocates of gun control seem to strongly believe that by adding restrictions on firearms, the amount of crimes committed with guns will decrease. Statistics, however, have shown otherwise. Let us look at Chicago for an example. A ban on handguns became effective in Chicago in 1982. In 2010, the ban was lifted due to the Supreme Court ruling that it was unconstitutional. Statistics on deaths caused by handguns were recorded before, during, and after the handgun ban took place. These recordings have shown that the deaths caused by handguns was significantly higher during the period that they were banned than the years before when they were not banned. From 1965 to 1982, about forty-eight percent of all murders were committed with a handgun in Chicago. During the twenty-eight years the handgun ban was enacted, approximately fifty-nine percent of all murders were committed with handguns (gun control, 2016).

Nowadays, many people are getting mug, burglarized, assaulted, rape, and killed. More and more people are protecting themselves against being victimized by carry weapons ,since law enforcement cannot protect them. What do we need to do to avoid mass shootings and random killings? In my opinion, high capacity ammo and weapons shouldn’t be allowed on the market or be sold to a regular individual, since mass shootings are committed by high capacity weapons designed only for military people. The high capacity guns should be banned in order to protect people, including

Another one. Another mass shooting. Another act of senseless murder. This happens too often. In fact it’s becoming normal.There’s that many. And as always, whenever one of these tragedies occurs there are calls for more gun control. However, as is the norm in American politics, nothing meaningful ever happens. No change is made, no policy is introduced, and these horrible events keep occurring. The argument seems plain as day. If these criminals are able to legally purchase these weapons that are then used to slaughter innocent men, women and children, then it only makes sense to ban these guns. So, why are no new gun control measures ever put in place? Because the state has no right to disarm the people? Under no circumstances?

Among many ways of prevention from high level incidents such as gun shooting crimes, one of the most important and helpful way is prevention through proper security laws. There is also a great quote that "prevention is better than cure". Prevention is almost considered as half the treatment of a particular disease. There are several problems and difficulties faced by people living in current society. One of the major diseases is the increasing trend of crimes like firearms and mass shooting.

The most recent news headline lately has been centered on the deadliest massacre in Las Vegas, according to Criss, CNN reporter it killed 58 people and wounded over 500 people by a man who was able to obtain gun ownership, and explicitly killed innocent lives, a tragic lost for everyone affected. Another deadly attack that shaken the nation, happened in Connecticut 2012, it was a tragic school shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary school, the aftermath according to Cowan, of the New York Times, diagnosed the shooter Adam Lanza with Schizophrenia. Both of these massive shootings led to many young lives taken away too soon by destructive gun violence. So the question that’s still on the rise and still a wide ongoing debate, should gun violence be banned? Will banning, or regulating guns stop a person to commit such violence, and crime?. America is home to hundreds of guns, legally or not, people will manage to obtain firearms, and after all under the second amendment of the constitution citizens have the right to bear arms for self-defense. However, when firearms are in the hands of an individual who are not in the right state of mind and use guns as an assault weapons, or gun violence that should be the nation’s priority concern. Shift our attention, and instead closely focus in attempting to prevent people who are at risk; such as people with mental illness, criminal family history of domestic violence, strictly, meticulously monitored, so firearms weapons can thence be kept away out of the hands of these highly at risks individuals, in addition improve economic and increase educational opportunities for mental health care.

I choose to talk on a topic that most people is clearly not comfortable talking about until something major happens. I chose to talk on gun control, not that this is an easy subject to focus on but one that is seeking the attention all around the world. The one thing I do not like when it comes to any law is that religion and politics is always brought into anything when someone wants to make and prove a point. “The second amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns; that guns are needed for self-defense from threats ranging from local criminals to foreign invaders; and that gun ownership deters crime rather than causes more crime” (Procon.org., 2017). One thing I find interesting for the argument is that guns are rarely used in self-defense. This is true most of the crimes that is being committed are most of the victims are not allowed to defend oneself making the crime seem very senseless. Another pro is guns that are owned legally will likely get stolen and used by someone with a criminal background. More gun controls lead to fewer suicides. Most adults, including gun owners, support common sense gun control such as background checks, bans on assault weapons, and bans on high-capacity magazine. Enacting gun control laws such as mandatory safety features would reduce the number of accidental gun deaths.