The Pros And Cons Of Later School Start Times

The text states, “Start school later” “Too-early school start times are a national public health concern with consequences impacting children...” “Besides forcing many children to walk and drive to school in pre-dawn darkness, these hours are creating a generation deprived of the sleep that growing brains and bodies require. Restoring traditional school start times, as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Medical Association, and the Centers for Disease Control, is a practical and necessary solution with broad and immediate benefits for children of all ages.” Kids which schools have early starts lack in health, where at schools with later starts, kids get the sleep they need for their growing and developing bodies. This shows how later school starts benefit kids in

Another line states “The Minneapolis school district, for example, changed its start time from 7:20 to 8:40 a.m., giving its 12,000 high school an extra hour and twenty minutes each morning.” results have shown that many students have benefited from this particular change.Many students stated or reported less depression when there was a later starting time and many more students were alert and ready for learning.Michelle also states in her evidence there has been a change in dropouts as the number is decreasing. These many things help Michelle’s argument throughout her

Have you ever wondered about the effects that would be brought if school started later? At the moment, school clearly begins too early. This is a problem that is unquestionably bringing negative affects to many students. Many schools throughout the country are addressing this problem by considering school schedule changes including later start times for middle and high schools. Research indicates there are unfavorable effects to current school schedules, as well as well as positive effects to delayed start times. To best meet the needs of teens, school should start later.

Despite the overwhelming evidence given by current research, many people refuse to change school start times because of the lack of noticeable impact some schools had or the impact it had on some people’s schedules. Pannoni cites a statement by the Iowa City Community School District which found that “the later start time . . . [did] not reduce the number of tardy students by any appreciable amount.” The principal of Ballard High School agreed by saying that he “would be surprised to see large improvements in either attendance or grade data compared with past years” (Pannoni). Many schools refused to change because of how the later start and dismissal times would affect extracurricular activities and students with jobs. This change would also interfere with bus schedules and childcare habits. However, these seem like small problems that can be overcome when the results are that “later school start times were associated with students sleeping longer at night, less tardiness, having higher test scores, being less depressed, using less caffeine and other drugs, . . . and experiencing fewer morning car crashes” (Fenwick).

After you read the first quote you maybe wonder why did the Seattle school board changed their start time, and is it good or bad for students. The Seattle school said that the start time should help more students get A’s in their class with more sleep. My opinion of this situation is that the students of Seattle aren’t going to get better grades. The student in Seattle aren’t going to get

The school day should start later in order improve students’ mental health. Survey results have consistently indicated that middle level and high school students who start school at 7:15 a.m. or earlier obtain less total sleep on school nights due to earlier rise times in comparison to students at later-starting schools. () This is just the beginning of the negative impacts that early start times have on students. By starting school at a later time, students’ brains will function better, their grades and learning increases, and will be more mentally stable.

3. According to the article, what are some of the advantages of a later high school start time? What are some of the disadvantages?

In the United States of America, middle and high schools start as early as 7:00 am, requiring teenagers to rise at least at 6:30 in order to make it to class. As a nation, we can only view this as a monstrosity. In this essay, I will be going over three areas of analysis: one, why early start times for middle and high school create situations not in the interest of learning, two, why a later commencement time would have substantial benefits, and three, why said benefits would outweigh the disadvantages.

In Justin O’Neil’s article, “Should Schools Start Later”, he says, “ School bus schedules are arranged to meet the needs of not just one school, but all the schools in a district…..” and then proceeds to say “Later start times would mean some districts might have to invest in additional buses and drivers, which can be expensive.” This explains that if we started school later, buses will have to figure out a way to get children from every school they are responsible for, if there are no staggered times. If they could not solve this problem, we would need more buses and drivers. Transportation will then turn into another dreadful problem that we would have to fix. Also, think about how the bus driver would probably get home later. This could interfere with their personal

Wahlstrom reports on the contentious discussion and debate about whether or not schools should consider switching to later start times. When classes start before 8:15, students become sleep deprived causing memory deficits, impaired performance and alertness, and being able to stay on task. Even though there are all these negative consequences to early start times why do schools still continue to start before 8:15? Wahlstrom mentioned the possible reasons why more schools have not made the switch. Wahlstrom stated, “As other districts consider the change to a later start for their high schools… an extremely contentious decision because administrators do not want any local advocacy group or start policymaker to interfere in a decision normally

Justin O’Neill in his article, “Should Schools Start Later?” found that, “...Many parents would no longer have time to drive their kids to

In the articles of “High schools starting later to help sleepy teens”, claim is that school

In discussions of whether or not schools should start later, one controversial issue has been that it gets in the way of parents work schedules. People who believe that it’s too much of an inconvenience claim that it’s never too soon to start getting used to an early schedule. On the other hand, those who believe schools should start later assert that it’s much better for a student's concentration and overall health. My own view is there are more benefits than negatives and we should really start to consider such a change.

One of the reasons that school should be started later is because it does not give growing teens enough time to sleep. Sleep researcher, Wendy Troxel, who spoke on TED, says that high school aged kids’ sleep cycles do no start until 11 p.m and do not end until 8 a.m. This means that whenever students’ alarms go off from anywhere around 5-7:30 a.m, it simply does not

School’s start times have been an arising issue in the United States for many years and recently began to surface. More and more individuals everyday are realizing the effects of a school’s start time on those attending the school, teaching at the school, parents of those who attend the school as well as the surrounding community. “…education seems to be the most sleep-deprived field in America” (Black, 2001). Beginning a school’s start time at 7:17 in the morning isn’t the best time to try and teach adolescents calculus or Shakespeare. “For many, the unusually early start time is nothing short of torturous. A survey of 26 Denver –area companies showed that the average adult trudges into