The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

What is net neutrality you may ask? Well net neutrality or open internet is legal content and/or applications that internet service providers give you on an equal basis. They cannot have any favorite websites and block others.In my opinion in favor net neutrality. It makes sure every web site is treated equally. This goes for all video,audio,etc. in my future I want to be a entrepreneur and net neutrality helps people get access to broadband networks without any problems! Big companies like Apple, Microsoft, google (and more) also go for net neutrality. As well as those companies there are some that are against net neutrality. Companies such as AT&T, comcast, cox, and verizon are against net neutrality. They said “The rules are too heavy-handed and could stifle investment and innovation.” Again in my opinion i think net neutrality is a great thing because i think everyone should be treated equally and should have the same chance and votes should have a fair play and have no cheating. Of course pirating is extremely illegal and should be corrected, many web sites are being copyrighted and stealing people's identities and these innosite people are getting banked ruped and losing there jobs for using these websites. Net neutrality is basically the human rights but on computers people need and deserve them.For the people that are against net neutrality, a new FCC chairman, ajit pai,worked as a lawyer for verizon and plans to get rid of net neutrality which would be a big win for

Net Neutrality is allowing users to free and open access of internet irrespective of sources or internet providers demanding special charges in order to use services provided by them. Now a days Internet is one of the essential part for everyday communication in life. Several services were used in our day to day life for example GPS tracking, google, Wikipedia, Netflix etc., and we can’t imagine a day without the internet. Internet Service providers combining with corporations were utilizing this and trying to make profit out of this by imposing more charges on the user in order to utilize the services needed for him with more speed and flexibility. There are several discussions and debates supporting and opposing net neutrality.

At the end of December in 2017 the big subject was about Net Neutrality and whether or not the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) would be able to repeal it or not. The FCC is an independent branch of the US government and if they repealed Net Neutrality, they and big 'name brand' service providers would be able to charge the American body for internet and would be able to completely monitor and slow certain sites. When confronted about much of the backlash from the public about the repeal, Ajit Pai (the chairmen of the FCC) claimed that 7.5 million of the complaints he received were from a single scammer.

With the continually changing methods of reporting information, such as the internet, regulators struggled with monitoring and controlling the information that people were providing. On August 12, 2008, FCC Commissioner Robert M. McDowell stated that the reinstitution of the Fairness Doctrine could be intertwined with the debate over network neutrality, a proposal to classify network operators as common carriers required to admit all Internet services applications and devices on equal terms, presenting a potential danger that net neutrality and Fairness Doctrine advocates could try to expand content controls on the Internet.(AuBuchon) The has always been mixed emotions with the public’s opinions on this issue, but with rapid increase in technologies it would possible that any viewpoint could be aired through the many types of communication available to everyone, and go

They believe that government should not be involved with our internet. Also, more governmental jobs are created because of net neutrality which increases bureaucracy and the size of our national government. The vote to repeal net neutrality puts consumers and private businesses back in charge of how the internet operates. The Open Internet Preservation Act, proposed by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.), includes all of the basic net neutrality rules except paid prioritization, or the ability for ISP's to speed up certain websites for money.

Federal Communications Commission, otherwise known as the FCC, voted two-to-one in May of 2017, to begin the tearing down of the net neutrality law (Rushe), that which protected individuals from companies that purposefully slowed down service lanes so as to regulate what was being broadcasted across computers. Chief internet official Ajit Pai at the FCC stated that he believed that the dismantling of the net neutrality laws could pave the way for a more competitive marketplace, that which would “lift ‘heavy-handed’ internet regulations that overly restricted internet providers” (White). The repealing of net neutrality seems to mainly garner approval from big companies, such as Verizon, and more recently, Comcast, companies that would do well by the repealing of such a law. With net neutrality gone companies such as those listed above would be able to, legally, regulate and control what people saw on the internet by slowing down or speeding up lanes depending on the affiliation the company has with that specific website (Finley). However, even with Title II in effect, some companies have found a way to circumvent those rules in order to ‘play favorites’ as it were. For instance, when AT&T customers access the Direct TV’s streaming service they may find that the data extrapolated from the service used did not count towards their current data limit’s (Finley). It is also believed that with no regulations in place regarding net neutrality, companies have the potential of becoming dictators and blocking

Web. 26 Apr. 2015. Ruiz, Rebecca R., and Steve Lohr. " F.C.C. Approves Net Neutrality Rules,

Throughout the span of 2008-2010, another net neutrality bill was introduced in congress regarding Comcast blocking files but, Comcast sued the FCC saying that the FCC has no authority over their internet service. . The FCC attempted to apply a cease and desist order against Comcast but eventually they canceled it. The outcome of this dispute created an Open Internet Order by Democrat Julius Genachowski (Reardon, 2015). This is very significant because this is what made the net neutrality rules official in the FCC regulation. This order explains that people can access content to the Internet without experiencing blocking or slowing down. In addition, broadband providers have to be clear about their management networks and practices.

In the above article and video, the concept of the FCC voting to cease net neutrality in the upcoming month is discussed. The Federal Communications Commission is the independent branch of the U.S. government, which helps regulate communications via radio, television, and internet. Currently, the FCC has laws and rules set in place governing the existence of a “net neutrality”. New neutrality, also called the Open Internet” is essentially what allows all United States citizens to view and post whatever they please online, without it being blocked or limited by a third party or network provider. However, on December 14th the FCC will be voting on whether or not to “rollback” net neutrality, with chairman Ajit Pai at the helm of the limited internet

When ISPs were attempting to take away the FCC’s regulations millions of Americans issued complaints with the FCC in an attempt to keep their freedom and it was successful for the time. Now however many members of Congress in the GOP are attempting to undo the very protections that millions of Americans fought for. In order to allow for the best protection of the internet, and for it to remain open and free, the United States needs to reclassify broadband to Telecommunication Services so the FCC can regulate and protect the internet from those who would seek to harm it. Senator you once stated: “My question about everything I do is, does it make our country stronger?” and I assure you that this will not only make the country stronger but allow for a major instrument of freedom to remain an instrument of freedom. I want to thank you for taking the time out of your very important and busy schedule to read this and hope that you will honor the wishes of millions of

On December 14th, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will vote to replace current rules enforcing net neutrality. Nothing short of an extinction-level event will prevent it. But before we’re resigned to fate, know that while the battle for net neutrality at the FCC may have been lost, the war isn’t even close to being over which sounds kinda scary. Really, the net neutrality fight is simply migrating to a different theater, namely, The US Courts of Appeals. And excluding the possibility of a Supreme Court challenge, the outcome could very well drag on for another year and a half or more.

After Obama’s Presidency, President Trump believed that net neutrality is a principle that limits the progress and innovation of many companies. In addition, President Trump claimed that he heard a lot of complains about net neutrality; therefore, he decided to take actions and support the repealment of net neutrality. A Republican named Ajit Pai, recently appointed as the chairman of FCC, started to raise voice against the principle of net neutrality. Note that Ajit Pai is also a former lawyer of Verizon. Ajit Pai argued that “higher profits for broadband companies would allow them to invest and expand their networks to rural America.” Furthermore, he claimed that “Entrepreneurs are constantly developing new technology and services. But too

I think that net neutrality is essential. There are people who say that getting rid of net neutrality would be good for the public, because it would enable services like Netflix, Google, etc. to pay internet service providers (ISPs) to make their services run faster. However, this could also mean that ISPs are able to charge users more to access certain sites. Some people believe this wouldn’t happen, because if one ISP decides to do that, they would immediately lose almost all of their customers - however, if every ISP did that, then they wouldn’t have to worry about losing customers. Another problem is that if an ISP limits traffic to a certain site, and that site doesn’t have enough revenue to pay the ISP a better connection, then that produces

Yet at the same time, these two sets of companies compete for customers, creating a glaring conflict of interest. Whilst these issues seemed to be resolved by the middle of the twentieth century, the advent of the internet introduced a whole new set of problems. The term net neutrality, first coined by Tim Wu, Professor of the Columbia University Law School in 2003, came to represent a question that had long been perceived as being of relatively little concern – is unfettered access to the internet a right, or a privilege? (Cheng and Bandyopadhay 2011: 60) (Greenstein 2007: 61, 85) The debate around internet regulation and net neutrality first gained traction in 2002, when the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) controversially ruled that broadband internet was to be classed as an information service rather as a telecommunications service, and thus made it exempt from a considerable range of content and conduct regulations that it would otherwise have been subject to. For those Americans, as exemplified by organizations such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who saw the internet as a space of uninhibited free expression that needed to be protected from the influence of corporate meddling, this decision was very frustrating. As promoted by Wu and others, net neutrality came to represent the belief that ‘internet data packets should move nondiscriminatorily’ – that is, the data (‘packets’ essentially being a technical

Throughout the last decade, the idea of Net Neutrality has been the topic of many debates. Net Neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers should not be allowed to block their users from any content regardless of its source. The Debate is still continuing in 2017 with the F.C.C planning to repeal Net Neutrality and allow internet providers to completely regulate what their users can see and charge the users extra for “luxuries” such as social media, messaging, email, and music. There are two sides of this argument, one side believes that Net Neutrality should be taken away, while others believe that it is unfair for the Internet providers to have the right to take away the access to any content. Internet providers should not be allowed to control what content one can view when surfing the internet.