preview

The Pros And Cons Of Western Medicine

Decent Essays

How should we define a patient’s outcome? Should we determine whether a patient’s outcome is positive or negative through the fact that the or she live or die from the treatment?
For the last 40 years, Western medicine has established its bioethics through the four principles: autonomy, non-malfeasance, beneficence, and justices. In other words, a medical provider has to respect a patient’s decision, while also making sure he or she receives the most benefits and the least harms from the medical treatment. While Western medicine has developed with four sets of principles for treating a patient’s disease, Western medicine is systemically flawed by not recognizing a patient as a person manifest with a cultural identity. The current system allows …show more content…

To begin with, Western Medicine’s inattention to cultural attention takes away one of the basic sense of healing, communication through the clinical encounter. According to Kirmayer, “ A clinical encounter must recognize relevant cultural differences, negotiate common ground in terms of problem definition and potential solutions, accommodate the differences that are associated with good clinical outcomes, and manage irresolvable differences. It has become a tendency for western medical providers to view patient’s outcome as positive when the patient lives and negative when the patient die or continues to suffer after treatment. In order to get a patient’s outcome, western medical providers require patients to sign an informed consent of treatment. This act of authority or provider’s dominance,without an clinical

Get Access