The Psychological Reason We Hurt Each Other Essay

Violence is one of the most exaggerated forms of physical aggression and it can exist for a series of reasons. It involves a person or a group of persons acting against another person or groups of persons with the purpose to achieve one or several diverse goals. In many cases violence results from individuals perceiving the acts of other people as hostile and thus wanting to act against these people before it is too late. Depending on the situation, more or less individuals might get involved in an act of violence, especially when they consider that it would be essential for them to do so.

In 2012, 16259 people in the United States were murdered and another 1.8 million people were sent to the hospital due to assault. Humans resorting to violence and harming others is a daily occurrence, but why? Is it in our nature, are we instinctively violent, and why is it that these acts are not only happening in the United States but worldwide. Although the average person does not leave their home planning on harming somebody that day, under the right circumstances almost every single person in this world will commit an act of violence. Sometimes these acts are justified, such as when we are trying to protect ourselves or a loved one, but what about the smaller acts that we all do every day.

In order to discuss the modes of violence inherent in any symbolic order, a discussion of violence must precede its effects. It is easy to observe what I will call ‘subjective’ violence; however, doing so taints an ‘objective’ assessment. By subjective violence, I mean acts that we can describe as breaking the status quo or utterly unacceptable; spewing a spit ball, punching a friend, engaging in armed conflict, and so on. Objective violence is the status quo, or systemic acts maintaining the existing order; profit schemes enabling the last recession, government institutions that motivate resistance, etc. For the sake of brevity, I only wish to note that I am conceptualizing the notion of violence in an operative sense, as, I believe, it is the only way to provide an effective critique of

Throughout the course of time, violence has been used as a tactic when trying to achieve something that one does not have already. Some may say that it is a useful tactic, while others strongly disagree. Although there are scenarios when one has to take risks. For example, if a business manager needs to keep his company up and running and needs to take risk for the better of his life and the ones around him, I wouldn’t be totally disgusted with him/her. Personally, in the terms of economics and trying to overcome a conflict, I am on the fence and agree with both sides of the argument. Honestly, it could go both ways, it’s just scaled on how far he/she takes the violence and how it’s affecting the community around.

Violence has been around us our whole lives and is something that will never come to a stop. Violence will continue through the rest of our lives and the lives to come in the future if someone doesn't step up and try to take a stand. Society’s leading problem is violence and can only be helped through the kind of leadership that demonstrates Trust and Integrity, Confidence, and a good communication.

As mentioned in the Main Thesis, there are three specific sections in “On Violence” book. In section I, the author cites a variety of historically relevant social scientists, with a focus on their thoughts on violence, war, and power. Engels (p. 4), Hobbes (p. 5), Chomsky (p. 7), Clausewitz (p. 8), Mao Tse-tung (p. 11), and Marx (p. 11-13) are cited in an attempt to frame the author’s discussion and definitions about the dynamic of power. In section II, Wright Mills (p. 35), Weber (p. 35), Clausewitz (p. 36), Strauz-Hupé (p. 36-37) and Jouvenel (p 37), Alexander Passerin d'Entréves’ The Nation of the State (37), the author makes it very clear that violence is the opposite of power, in which she will be explaining in section III. During this

Many can say that humans are naturally violent, especially when when they are put in stressful situations. On several occasions we have proven when worst comes to worst we usually end up making the wrong decisions because in some way that seems easier to us . For example we’ve started wars, riots and genocides. Not to say that there aren’t any people who haven’t resorted to violence but generally speaking most humans will participate or at least agree to these violent actions if it can benefit them. Even though they know it’s wrong.

People should not be violent because they can harm other people that haven’t done nothin. Another reason is people should not be violent because it can lead into big trouble killing somebody when you are violent can lead to big trouble than anything else. Also, you can go to jail for your rest of your life time. Being violent is not good for you, your family members, and your friends.

In this paper I will argue that violence is a vice based on the fact that it is ruining lives not only in war but in our society and changing the lives of soldiers due to the deteriorating mental health. Also, in this paper I will argue how author, Bonnie Mann, would agree with me and my opinion on the sentence previously stated. Pope John Paul the Second once said, “Violence is a crime against humanity, for it destroys the very fabric of society”. (azquotes.com), this is true for both non-war and war violence. I agree with this quote because I too believe that violence is ruining our society from different points of view. I will argue my points on how I feel violence is destroying our society and the well-being of our American soldiers by quoting Bonnie Mann’s “Sovereign Masculinity”, as well as taking examples that happen in today’s world from various scientific and news networks. We need to understand how much violence is effecting the world negatively, there are far too many stories all the way from the streets of Harlem to the war in Afghanistan. Violence is immoral and this paper will not only discuss why I think that but give real life example and so these opinions of mine can be seen as facts. The violence used in our society such as police brutality weakens our community by people no longer having trust in the police and having them protect us when they are seen harming us. This is also true for war because of the number of soldiers that have PTSD when they return

Mahatma Ghandi once said, “I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.” Although Gandhi is completely against violence, I believe that violence can be justified depending on the cause of it. If violence is used in the act of defense from an aggressor, then it is acceptable. However, in any other case, violence is unjustified. Looking back in history, several examples can be appreciated where violent paths were chosen. If those scenarios are analysed today, one can realize that peaceful options were available, but not chosen. Individuals like Martin Luther King Jr and Mahatma Ghandi both used peaceful methods to reach their own respective objectives. Mahatma Gandhi used non violent protests to break the British rule and Martin Luther King Jr followed suite with his own non violent methods including the famous Selma march for social justice. However, there are some circumstances where violence is the only answer. For example, during World War II, the Allied forces were compelled to fight back against the aggressive Nazi Forces in order to protect the larger population. Additionally, I believe that positivity can not be a result of reacting to conflict or danger with violence. As Gandhi said, the evil that derives from violence far outweighs the short term positives. As I look back at my cherished childhood books and movies, I realize that in most cases, violence was showcased to solve problems rather than

Another instance when violence can be justified is when one is protecting himself from another person’s attacks. It is only human nature to protect oneself, in the only way one knows how to. For example, if one was held at gun-point and given the chance, one would definitely rib his attacker and proceed to inflict harm on him in any way, to make an escape. In times of desperation, violence is seen as the only way out and thus can be justified.

Violence is the unspoken disease of the world. According to Christopher Mikton, the World Health Organization, is a leader in the study of violence in the world (Mikton, 45). WHO states that, an estimated 1.4 million deaths occur every year due to this “disease” (WHO). In Marilyn Manson’s “Columbine: Whose Fault Is It?” Manson elaborately explains how violence has consistently been the social normality (Manson). Mankind has become so desensitized to violence that it is used as a scape goat for everyday problems. Humans are unknowingly self-harming by being violent in nature. Violence no longer is no longer considered violence, it has become a source of entertainment. Violence

When we think of violence, we automatically picture guns and knives being used to kill people. Although this is a part of violence, it’s not the only way a violent situation can arise. Violence can be any harm done to a person through physical contact. Along with

Globally there is an estimate of 7.5 billion people worldwide. Annually 1.6 million lose their lives due to violence, stated in a recent World Health Organization article. Now imagine how many people survive and continue to endure another individual’s violent behavior. Violence is a form of aggression due to instantaneously behavior in a particular situation. There are many shapes and forms of violence, like physical, sexual, and psychological abuse. These different factors contribute in creating what we know as violence. Whether you have a perfect life and do not come across violence in your life, violence occurs everywhere, no matter the time, place, and or person.

In society when one person thinks of violence, one usually thinks of individual acts of violence. These types of violence are the kinds of violence most people fear, which causes us to lock our doors at night. But this is not the only kind of violence we are faced with. In today’s