The Purpose Of Human Rights And Humanitarian Law

Human rights are rights innate to every single individual, whatever our nationality, where you live, sex, national or ethnic birthplace, color of skin, religion, dialect/language, and many more. We are all similarly qualified for our human rights without segregation. These rights are altogether interrelated, associated and resolute. Widespread human rights are regularly communicated and ensured by law, in the types of treaties, standard global law, general standards and different wellsprings of international. International human rights law sets down commitments of Governments to act in certain routes or to cease from specific acts, keeping in mind the end goal to advance and secure human rights and central flexibilities of people or

Human rights can be summarized as the activities and freedoms that all human beings are entitled to enjoy and only by virtue of their humanity. These conditions are generally guaranteed in the constitution of the land. They are widely felt in the area as they are divided and not limited to political, social economic and cultural rights. Some of the main principles of human rights include the fact that they are inherent, inalienable and indivisible as well. In this relation, human rights can never be taken away from an individual whereby the enjoyment of one right should not infringe the enjoyment of other. They must all be respected and maintained.

It was “solemnly” proclaimed that “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights [UNDHR] states a common understanding of the peoples of the world concerning the inalienable and inviolable rights of all members of the human family and constitutes an obligation for the members of the international community” . The UNDHR gave value to the term ‘human rights’, stressing the value of human dignity. However, the article also recognises the need for social order, Article 29 acknowledges that limits to these rights must be determined by law and can only be for the purposes of securing recognition and respect of others and to meet “the just requirements of morality, public order, and the general welfare in a democratic society”. Any restriction on these rights has to be justified as proportionate to the aims pursued by the restriction, for example, a police officer is justified in wielding a firearm against an individual deemed to be putting other lives in

Treaties are the highest source of international law besides jus cogens norms that have binding effect on the parties that ratify them.2 International human rights treaties rely on the “name and shame” mechanisms to pressure states to improve practices.3 However with “toothless” international human rights norms, moral coercion is not always effective. An empirical study conducted by Professor Oona Hathaway assessing the effect of human rights treaty ratification on human rights compliance, maintains in its findings that ratification of human rights treaties has little effect on state practices.4 States do not feel pressured to comply and change their practices, rather, signing treaties is “more likely to offset

Humanitarian effort is an interesting topic to me. While reading about these efforts it is clear that people are at the heart of such efforts. Humanitarian efforts should be guided by goals such as; humanity, impartiality, independence, and neutrality. These important principles should be at the core to humanitarian work. It is critical to distinguish humanitarian action from other forms of activities. Humanitarian Laws, International Human Rights Law, and International Refugee Laws provides the frame work for fundamental legal standards relating to the protection of groups and individuals, as well as to the nature of the assistance being provided. In thinking about this topic along with the first of two questions needed to complete this assignment, I researched International Law as a Basis for Humanitarian Intervention. I discovered that there is no state right to humanitarian interventions. Furthermore, I learned that no government has the right to violate the territorial integrity and political independence of another country, locality or state under any circumstance. In my own opinion basic human rights have to be met no matter the circumstance.

The principles of humanitarian law are thought to apply in conflict, and to regulate the conduct of military forces. The rules of warfare aim to safeguard human life and some other fundamental human rights, and to ensure that war is limited in its scope and level of violence. Total war, where neither discrimination nor proportionality serves as mitigating

Human rights are a relevant issue but also pertinent to all people. The context of human rights in international relations is a matter that author raises in the book to offer guidance on the formulation of policies that are pertinent to co-existence in human beings world (Donnelly 19). Globally, there are best practices that are advance through regional collaboration that is all geared toward enabling conducive environment and better human relations. The human rights that are advocated for through the international human rights include humanitarian efforts, economic rights, and the social rights. The humanitarian rights are all geared towards offering support and care to the people who are facing various forms of tragedies in given parts of the world (Donnelly 23). Through the humanitarian efforts that are fronted through international rights is the provision of better healthcare and food to the global

The way of humanity to the modern understanding of human rights was long. The core element of a legal status of human and citizen are their rights, freedoms, and duties. Human rights are the fundamental rights and freedoms granted to all people, regardless of their nationality, gender, national or ethnic origin, race, religion, language or another status. Human rights are the social ability to act freely, to choose the type and extent of their behavior in order to satisfy diverse material and spiritual needs of the person by using certain social benefits within limits set by legislative acts. In the rights, freedoms, and responsibilities standards of behavior that are considered binding, useful, appropriate for normal functioning of society are not only fixed but also reveals the basic principles of relations between the state and the individual. Ensuring human rights and freedoms the state, in turn, requires certain behavior from the people that are formulated in the system of legal obligations. (Ishay, 2004) The most common in the legal literature classification criterion of the human and

To protect human rights is to guarantee that people receive some degree of decent, humane treatment. In addition, political systems that protect human rights to reduce world conflict in many countries have promoting worldwide respect for human rights. Global human rights law and immigrant law all protect the right to life and corporal veracity and attempt to limit the unrestrained power of the state. However, in many cases public authorities and administration officials’ establishment policies that violates fundamental human rights. Such abuses of power by supporting leaders and state officials have devastating war crimes and crimes against humanity. Therefore, policies to promote and protect human rights must be an ethnically personalized to avoid uncertainty and perceptions of imposition into domestic affairs.

Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions provides that States parties undertake to “ensure respect for the present Convention ”. The same provision is repeated in Additional Protocol I in relation to respect for the provisions of that Protocol . It further provides that in the event of serious violations of the Protocol, States parties undertake to act, jointly or individually, in cooperation with the United Nations and in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations. A similar provision is included in the Second Protocol to the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property.

Human Rights is a conceptual idea that no matter who we are and where we are born every human is entitled to basic rights and freedoms. Human rights are not privileges and cannot be granted or revoked. They are inalienable and universal. The concept is thought provoking but becomes difficult once put into practice. This is because rights and freedoms are defined differently across societies and cultures. Different societies dictate how their people are treated and what their rights are. Key factors of implementing the idea of universal human rights must be questioned. These questions are; what constitutes basic human rights, who get to pick them, and who enforces them and how?

Human rights as a topic of study may have a simple, incontestable sound to it, but this is far from the case. Yes, most people will recognize that human beings deserve certain rights, but past that point all opinions begin to split and scatter. As it stands, human rights are an ever changing and complex category of issues. In order to try and make sense of these complex topics, scholars employ a range of theories. Theories act like a lens, helping to organize the analytical process and point people in the appropriate direction. Without the foundation that theory lays out, the thought process, as well as arguments, can quickly become a mess of smaller thoughts, often with contradicting outcomes. In this paper, I will utilize Liberalism to try and understand the nature of human rights as a political issue within the international system.

It seems pretty standard that human rights should be applied, under any circumstance, to every member of the human race. Unfortunately, even in the year 2017, this is rarely always the case. There are many factors that decide whom gets treated with respect and whom is still seen as a lesser human being and more often than not the middle and lower classes in societies are left to their own devices in terms of trying to strive for equality. This notion is not only unnerving but massively disappointing in a day and age where equal rights for all humans should not only be expected but also enforced at all times no matter the given situation. “The idea that the protection of human rights knows no international boundaries and that the international community has an obligation to ensure that governments guarantee and protect human rights has gradually captured the imagination of mankind. Today violators of human rights can no longer count on one or the other superpower to shield them against international condemnation.” (Buergenthal, 1)

One of the critical contagious As international concern, human rights issues are among the most widely debated in the world today. This is because the question of Human Rights is fundamental to mankind . For a long time human rights

The United Nations vision is of a world in which the human rights of all are fully respected and enjoyed in conditions of global peace. The High Commissioner works to keep that vision to the forefront through constant encouragement of the international community and its member States to uphold universally agreed human rights standards. It is their role to alert Governments and the world community to the daily reality that these standards are too often ignored or unfulfilled, and to be a voice for the victims of human rights violations everywhere. It is also their role to press the international community to take the steps that can prevent violation around the world.