The Reasons behind Why Dictatorial Leaders Separte Children from Their Families

They cannot be whom they want to be, or act for themselves. All forms of individualism are repressed. These people are simply like tools in the dictator’s hands. These dictators can end the lives of others, choose who they will be and what they will do for the rest of their lives, and even what they will look like! The characters are forced or molded into what the dictators see as perfection. There is no such thing as a perfect society. Not everyone can be pleased, but at least there is a way the people could have the rights they

Naturally parents will want to see their children do well. Sometimes though in an effort to keep their children safe parents inadvertently hold their children back from exploring the world around them, lessening their chances to learn and progress. While it is understandable to want to shelter

The main point of the legalities states that contact between child and family is beneficial to

Ayn Rand’s novella, Anthem, depicts a totalitarian society that oppresses the ideology of individualism. Within these societies children live apart from their families and grow up without any inherited characteristics of being an individual. Anthem is an example of this kind of society because it showcases the link between a totalitarian dictator’s power to the oppression of individualism found in a children that live apart from their families. Totalitarian Dictators enforce the arrangement of children living separate from their families because it oppresses individualism and allows for a better grasp of beneficial control over a society.

Those fortunate enough to be ”hatched” more intelligent, are conditioned to dislike and like what the government wants them too through electric shock, high pitched noises, and other forms of non invasive torture. One generic way that all children are controlled is thorough a technique called hypnopedia, which is repeating things over and over during sleep until the words are memorized. So from childhood, both governments have control through not allowing the children any time to think any anti- government thoughts and filling the spaces instead with the thoughts they want to be there.

Dictators often will enforce families living apart from each other. In some cases, this happens mainly because dictators don't want parents to feed their children information about individualism or even spread the idea; or just orating negative words against the government. So, they keep parent and child separated. If they did keep families together when negative words were being spoken, a revolt can break out insidiously, ruining whatever system the dictator had. Also, this living arrangement may be enforced

Where do children in totalitarian states live? Right from birth, children are taken from their parents and live in places controlled by the state. They never meet their parents and the state takes over teaching the children everything they think is important for their lives. In Ayn Rand’s Anthem, children never live with their parents and never know who they are. Right from birth, they are taken to the House of Infants and from there they live in homes their entire life. Dictatorial leaders enforce this living arrangement in these sorts of societies. In totalitarian societies, dictatorial leaders force children to live apart from their families to gain complete control of their lives without any outside influences.

This is to ensure that the needs, interest and decisions of the child comes first and are being met. Also, it is by law that parents be responsible and knows everything about their child when they are away from them or home.

There are several reasons I believe it is important to keep the leader from becoming too tyrannical. One of which is that the whole reason we broke away from England was because we wanted to get away from a system of government in which a single person rules

The only benefit to removing a child from its home with the parents, is that it allows the child to become focused on the duty they are given by the ruler. When the child is taken from the home, they lose the distraction of having a family. They may become a more productive

• Authoritarian parenting children may have less social competence due to the parent or parents telling the child what to do instead of allowing the child to make a choice. In some cases the demands are to forceful and resulted with the child or children to break down, rebel or run away.

The key role played by child-rearing values in tapping distinct worldviews had already been highlighted since the early 1960s. As Martin (1964, p. 86) argues “how to ‘bring up’ or socialize children is a matter of profound consequence, involving basic human values and objectives”. The child- rearing values scale taps the trade-off that lies at the heart of the concept of authoritarianism, namely the dilemma between personal autonomy and submission to conventional norms, without at the same time touching on specific political

Additionally it could possibly cause the child to have troubles later in life in yet another manner. When the day arises for the child to take hold of the reigns they still might feel the lack of opportunity to make their own decisions without the parent's interference. Furthermore the child might feel that they will never be free to make their own decisions, which could affect them psychologically if they came to realization that every decision that was or has been ever made will be a direct result of a choice that was made before they had a say. In Addition to these problems, there are economic problems that could potentially affect society in probably the worst way of all. It may not come to a surprise that it would cost a considerable amount

Dictatorial leaders have multiple reasons for separating children from their parents and family. Some reasons may include if they are taken from their families young they won’t remember their life with their families and won’t try and break the rules to find them. Another reason children may be taken from their families is to make sure that the parents and relatives do not tell them things that the leader does not want them to believe. A final reason that the dictator would take a child from their family is to keep them from becoming more advanced than they want them to. There are many other reasons why dictators may do this which will be explained.

A child would never cut a parent from his or her life unless they were taught to. Children are susceptible to manipulation at a young age due to their inability to obtain information and formulate their own opinions. In the past, children who were present during Hitler’s rule were subjects to manipulation and brainwashing. Just as, in 1984, children are used as spies to further control what was being said about the party, good or bad. In the dystopian novel, 1984, constructed by George Orwell, children are used by the party in a similar way as Hitler’s youth, both reinforcing their respective government’s laws and beliefs.