The Role Of Accountability In The USMC And The Work Force

As I have learned over the past seven years that I have been in the Army is that accountability and responsibility are the two

Accountability is everything within the Marine Corps and within the working world. Unit cohesion could not exist without accountability. Good communication could not happen without good accountability. Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines accountability as: “the quality or state of being accountable; especially: an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one's actions”

What is the importance of accountability in the military and in the work place? What is accountability by definition: (Department Of Defense) The obligation imposed by law or lawful order or regulation on an officer or other person for keeping accurate record of property, documents, or funds. The person having this obligation may or may not have actual possession of the property, documents, or funds. Accountability is concerned primarily with records, while responsibility is concerned primarily with custody, care, and safekeeping. Accountability is very important because it allows for your chain of command to know where you are at at the moment. Accountability in the workplace is defined as doing the right thing consistently, day in and

I as a Soldier firmly believe that accountability is highly important in the Army for these following reasons:

The morale and welfare of the men and women that serve our country is considered one of America’s primary missions. Throughout the course of American history, the U.S. government has set forth initiatives as well as mandated laws; with efforts to provide aid and support services for members of the armed services.

Accountability by definition means the quality or state of being accountable; especially : an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one 's actions. Accountability stems from late Latin accomptare (to account), a prefixed form of computare (to calculate), which in turn derived from putare (to reckon). While the word itself does not appear in English until its use in 13th century Norman England, the concept of account-giving has ancient roots in record keeping activities related to governance and money-lending systems that first developed in Ancient Egypt, Israel, Babylon, Greece, and later, Rome. In the United States Marine Corps it is very important to hold yourself accountable for all actions especially true the longer you are in. To myself it refers to the obligation of an individual to report formally to his superiors for the proper discharge of his responsibility. It is the answer ability of a subordinate to render an account of his activities to his superior. The person who accepts responsibility is accountable for the performance of the assigned duties. As such being late to work is a direct violation of accountability. Forgetting ones required materials for work may seem small and harmless but overall may develop into bigger issues if not dealt with accordingly.

I was in the Marine Corps serving under Third battalion Eleventh marines Mike Battery in Twenty-Nine Palms California from 2009-2013. What our unit did was put rounds down range, oorah. We were an artillery battery, think modern day cannons. As far as twenty-nine palms all you have to imagine is sand in a five hundred square foot mile area. My job as Ammo chief was to insure the safe handling and transportation of hundred pound high explosive bombs. On one partially long training exercise I was instructed to take my marines and four ‘7-ton’ trucks and go to the rear to load up with more ammo. No problem, I’ve done this before but on this occasion when I was going to return the battery would have moved positions. So they gave me the grid number

I have a comprehensive understanding of the Department of Defense’s vision and direction and long-range plans and emerging technologies that can lead to proper programming and resource allocation. The Strategy of the DoD, DoN, and the USMC relies on the use of innovation and emerging technologies to maintain both a strategic and tactical advantage in the warfighting domain, and as a means of achieving efficiencies in the business domains. The DoD in general and the DoN specifically have in their vision statements and leadership direction that the services will use innovation both as a force multiplier and a means to achieve efficiencies and costs savings. While the various Services and Agencies within the DoD differ in some aspects, there are numerous similarities. They all have the vision and objectives to delivery information to the user to meet the Command and Control and IT needs, even in a contested environment. Generally, the goals within the Department are to consolidate and stabilize the infrastructure, unify communications, manage innovation, build and maintain a strategic workforce, consolidate datacenters leading to improve application portfolio access and management and lastly enhance network operations. I will point out here that I have been materially involved in all aspects of these

I believe that one’s character is partially developed based on their core values. I personally embody core values such as dependability, honesty, and commitment. There are other core values that I would say are necessary in order to fit the identity as a military professional, but those three values are the ones that define me as a future leader in the military. A leader should be dependable at least. As a leader in the military, you constantly will have subordinates who are facing trials and tribulations in which they will need a leader that they can trust and depend on. That follows right into my next core value that is honesty. Being honest is the only way to really earn someone’s trust. An individual will only follow in an environment where he or she knows that the one leading them is consistently honest. This environment would include a leader that refrains from deception by lying or

Hello there, just wanted to get back to ya and touch basis on everything that’s going wrong in todays military. Ya know talking to that young handsome man Brian Robert Anthony Ware, he brought up a number of interesting points that, believe it or not, need be addressed. FIRST OF ALL, discipline in Americas Army has fallen precipitously since Vietnam. With loss of societal support from civilians, soldiers stopped receiving respect they require and long for. Over all that’s just one of many. When a nation you swore to protect turns on you because political power incites that what big army fights for is immorally correct. So as you can obviously see, this is one of many strong points not only for that handsome man Brian Ware, but also for the

Integrity is defined as the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness. In our profession as leaders in the military we are held to a set of values that includes integrity. While the Army defines integrity as doing what’s right, legally and morally. We also believe that the quality of a great leader must include integrity. Having integrity will ensure that we make the best decision and do what is best for our organization. In addition, by having integrity it helps us as leaders to earn the trust of our subordinates. Also by adhering to our moral principles this will help us to build a better relationship with our subordinates, family, and friends. Additionally, we also believe by being leaders with integrity

Even with all our magic technology and deep knowledge of the physical world, human beings still face the same crucial existential questions that concerned our ancestors thousands of years ago. Among these, is the question of what is good and what is bad. While many in the modern era prefer to bypass this issue, believing instead that everything is relative, most of us struggle with the concepts of good and bad every day. This extends into the field of moral philosophy, where three major and distinct ethical theories have come to dominate the contemporary debate: outcome ethics (or consequentialism), duty ethics (or deontology) and virtue ethics. Passing under criticism these three concepts allows evaluating my own philosophy and comparing its compliance to the professional military ethic.

Regrettably, the Marine Corps' approach to many of its recent character challenges has been somewhat reactive and repressive. A bucket of cold water thrown onto a raging fire in the form of a power point class on ‘what not to do’ added to the annual training bulletin or a non-judicial punishment is not enough. These efforts do have a role but despite such efforts public and media skepticism abounds and the character of the force is not necessarily improved. The forces' disdain for these initiatives has even become mundane, commonly thought of as hardly worthy of comment or reflection. Nothing could be further from the truth. This reflexive, unthinking mistrust and disgust reduces unit morale, good order and discipline, and adherence to lawful

counterproductive to the mission of our war fighters and disastrous to the mental health and stability of our warfighters.

The importance of integrity in the army is a steadfast, core value that is expressed in terms of constancy and consistency. As professionals in the military, we must practice high standards of integrity. Leaders and subordinates alike need a high level of integrity within the working environment on or off the battlefield. It is integrity that is the glue holds the relationships of all soldiers together. Without integrity or a lack thereof, the relationship is impossible. In other words, a lack or perceived lack of integrity can have a devastating effect on the military profession. Along with integrity, there is trust. One needs to trust that their counterpart, superior, or subordinate that they will exercise integrity in any given situation.